Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Status clear after #24620

Merged
merged 160 commits into from
Dec 13, 2023
Merged

Conversation

perunt
Copy link
Contributor

@perunt perunt commented Aug 16, 2023

Details

In this PR, the ability to set an expiration date for the status has been added.

To test it, you need to enable the beta flag 'customStatus'. I encountered some challenges regarding the UX of certain components, such as the time picker. Originally, the document described it as a 'terminal-like' input, where input goes from right to left, replacing inappropriate numbers with zeros. However, this approach didn't work well for numbers like 9:00. For instance, 9 was corrected to 0, resulting in 00:90. As a workaround, I implemented it as a standard time picker where you can change a number by replacing the next one after the caret.

I have ideas on how to enhance the user experience, but for now, this is version 1.

Fixed Issues

$ #23138
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  1. Use account A.
  2. Open Settings -> Profile -> Status.
  3. Select an emoji status and save it.
  4. Navigate to the 'clear after' page.
  5. Test all of the available options.
  6. Use the custom calendar picker.
  7. Use the custom time picker.
  8. Make sure that the status actually goes away after that time for you, and any other accounts you have chats with
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
      • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Untitled.2.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
telegram-cloud-document-2-5235489383485814489.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.SE.16.2.-.2023-09-27.at.17.55.10.mp4
Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-09-27.at.18.25.27.mov
iOS
Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.SE.16.2.-.2023-09-27.at.19.59.15.mp4
Android
telegram-cloud-document-2-5235489383485814486.mp4

@perunt
Copy link
Contributor Author

perunt commented Aug 21, 2023

image

Copy link
Contributor

@stitesExpensify stitesExpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, let's do this!

@stitesExpensify stitesExpensify merged commit d6755d6 into Expensify:main Dec 13, 2023
15 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/stitesExpensify in version: 1.4.13-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/stitesExpensify in version: 1.4.13-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

backgroundColor={theme.PAGE_THEMES[SCREENS.SETTINGS.PROFILE.STATUS].backgroundColor}
footer={footerComponent}
<ScreenWrapper
style={[StyleUtils.getBackgroundColorStyle(theme.PAGE_THEMES[SCREENS.SETTINGS.PROFILE.STATUS].backgroundColor)]}
Copy link
Contributor

@situchan situchan Dec 14, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any reason for adding this style?

This caused style regression on light mode:
Screenshot 2023-12-14

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This part was added before theme switching. So needs to be updated now

@deetergp
Copy link
Contributor

Hey gang 👋 I think this PR may have resulted in this deploy blocker #33128. Is this something we can get fixed quickly?

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/jasperhuangg in version: 1.4.13-8 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Navigation.goBack(ROUTES.SETTINGS_STATUS_CLEAR_AFTER);
};

if (lodashGet(privatePersonalDetails, 'isLoading', true)) {
Copy link
Contributor

@dukenv0307 dukenv0307 Dec 21, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@perunt Can you share the reason why we need to display loading here? That causes this bug #33369

Comment on lines +122 to +124
if (selectionHour.start !== selectionHour.end || !isOnlyNumericValue) {
return;
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This made the user unable to select all and delete (selection range have a start that is different than the end) - Coming from #33143

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It was made intentionally as it brings a new level of complexity, and validating becomes messy. We decided to release it as is and change how this input would work in further PRs

enabledWhenOffline
shouldUseDefaultValue
>
<DatePicker
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should use field components via the InputComponent wrapper in FormProvider. It works with the lifecycle of the Form. Directly using the component caused the #33423

Comment on lines +89 to +91
InteractionManager.runAfterInteractions(() => {
navigateBackToPreviousScreen();
});
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @perunt, could you please share why this runAfterInteractions was necessary here? It's causing some UX inconsistency: #34886, so I was thinking if we could remove it, or it's absolutely necessary here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As far as I rememeber, it helps to first update the status and then navigate back. This way, you avoid seeing the flickering status when going back

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe you could remember on what platform this was happening? I couldn't reproduce on the web even with the network set to "Slow 3G".

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Coming from #49337, calling navigateBackToPreviousScreen(); inside runAfterInteractions will hold it for a second before navigate, which cause this edge case when double-click on "Save" button, and it fixed here #49914

if (shouldClearServerError) {
FormActions.setErrors(formID, null);
}
FormActions.setErrorFields(formID, null);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tiny issue - #34684 (comment)

We should have re-rendered the form if the locale has changed.

const [hourStr] = timeString.split(/[:\s]+/);
const hour = parseInt(hourStr, 10);

if (hour === 0) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This caused this bug: we can't update the custom time to 0h

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.