Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't show the Download App Banner until Past Sign in #26182

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Aug 29, 2023

Conversation

grgia
Copy link
Contributor

@grgia grgia commented Aug 29, 2023

Details

Problem:
We originally showed this banner to all mWeb users either on the sign-in page or past sign in. As part of the SaaStr project, it was decided that the focus will be 1. Getting more users signed up and then 2. Getting users to download the app.

Solution
We will not show the Download App Banner on any sign on page (this includes our landing page and /saastr). Instead, we will show the banner after the user has logged in, and before the global create menu is opened for first time users.


Follow up for #25418

Changes:
See video:

Screen.Recording.2023-08-29.at.12.38.07.PM.mov

Fixed Issues

#25820
$ https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/310804
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

For the following platforms: NATIVE, WEB, DESKTOP

  1. Sign in to a new account
  • Verify that the Download App Banner does not render.

mWEB

  1. Sign into a new account
  • Verify Download App Banner appears
  1. Click the "Close" button on the Download App Banner
  • Verify that the Banner closes
  • Verify that Global Create menu is opened.
    mWEB IOS
  1. Sign into a new account
  • Verify Download App Banner appears
  1. Click the "Download" button on the Download App Banner
  • Verify that link opens Apple Store listing (note this will not work if your emulator does not have the App store)
    mWEB Android
  1. Sign into a new account
  • Verify Download App Banner appears
  1. Click the "Download" button on the Download App Banner
  • Verify that link opens Google Play Store listing

Offline tests

QA Steps

For the following platforms: NATIVE, WEB, DESKTOP

  1. Sign in to a new account
  • Verify that the Download App Banner does not render.

mWEB

  1. Sign into a new account
  • Verify Download App Banner appears
  1. Click the "Close" button on the Download App Banner
  • Verify that the Banner closes
  • Verify that Global Create menu is opened.
    mWEB IOS
  1. Sign into a new account
  • Verify Download App Banner appears
  1. Click the "Download" button on the Download App Banner
  • Verify that link opens Apple Store listing (note this will not work if your emulator does not have the App store)
    mWEB Android
  1. Sign into a new account
  • Verify Download App Banner appears
  1. Click the "Download" button on the Download App Banner
  • Verify that link opens Google Play Store listing

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web

No Banner

Screen.Recording.2023-08-29.at.1.36.58.PM.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
Screen.Recording.2023-08-29.at.1.33.39.PM.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-08-29.at.12.38.07.PM.mov
Desktop

No Banner

Screen.Recording.2023-08-29.at.1.36.00.PM.mov
iOS

No Banner

Screen.Recording.2023-08-29.at.1.38.26.PM.mov
Android

No Banner

Emulator loading

@grgia grgia self-assigned this Aug 29, 2023
@grgia grgia requested a review from a team as a code owner August 29, 2023 11:37
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team August 29, 2023 11:37
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 29, 2023

@jjcoffee Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from jjcoffee August 29, 2023 11:37
@dylanexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

@jjcoffee please prioritize this review as it's a high priority item! 🙇‍♂️

@grgia
Copy link
Contributor Author

grgia commented Aug 29, 2023

@jjcoffee could you please prioritize this PR review? 🙏

E/E issue reads:

Coming from this convo, we want to remove the banner prompting the user to download our app from the SaaStr landing page (sign in/sign up) in order to ensure we aren't increasing barriers to signing up.

@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

jjcoffee commented Aug 29, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
chrome-desktop-2023-08-29_17.08.23.mp4
Mobile Web - Chrome
android-chrome.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
ios-safari-2023-08-29_16.12.02.mp4
Desktop
mac-desktop-2023-08-29_16.17.24.mp4
iOS
ios-native-2023-08-29_15.47.11.mp4
Android
android-native-2023-08-29_17.00.41.mp4

@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

@grgia Just a nitpick: test steps need to updated to state the banner only appears after sign in. Also, not sure if it's a biggie but there are missing screens for platforms other than iOS mWeb (maybe we're skipping this to get it done quickly?).

@grgia
Copy link
Contributor Author

grgia commented Aug 29, 2023

@jjcoffee I have them, adding now (just wrapped up lunch)!

src/Expensify.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

@grgia Sorry another nitpick on the tests, there's still this line which is no longer relevant: From Sign in page, dismiss banner.

@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

@grgia Just the tweak to the tests and now some lint complaints and then we're good to go, I think!

@grgia
Copy link
Contributor Author

grgia commented Aug 29, 2023

@jjcoffee looking now!

@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

@grgia I think the test step 2. Sign out and Sign in again and verify that banner remains dismissed. isn't a feature that was added here? (In any case doesn't pass on Android Chrome)

@grgia
Copy link
Contributor Author

grgia commented Aug 29, 2023

@grgia I think the test step 2. Sign out and Sign in again and verify that banner remains dismissed. isn't a feature that was added here? (In any case doesn't pass on Android Chrome)

Oh that's correct, I'm removing that

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 29, 2023

@neil-marcellini Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 29, 2023

🎯 @jjcoffee, thanks for reviewing and testing this PR! 🎉

An E/App issue has been created to issue payment here: #26227.

Copy link
Contributor

@neil-marcellini neil-marcellini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm trying my best to understand this but finding it pretty confusing. Please update the test steps and provide a more thorough description of the problems and solutions solved by this PR.

Specifically I'm not understanding how this prevents showing the banner on the saastr login page.

Copy link
Contributor

@neil-marcellini neil-marcellini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Thank you for updating the PR description, code, and walking me through this.

@neil-marcellini neil-marcellini merged commit 265bf05 into main Aug 29, 2023
12 checks passed
@neil-marcellini neil-marcellini deleted the georgia-downloadAppBannerFixes branch August 29, 2023 18:05
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/neil-marcellini in version: 1.3.59-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/neil-marcellini in version: 1.3.60-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/neil-marcellini in version: 1.3.60-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 1.3.59-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 1.3.60-3 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@grgia grgia mentioned this pull request Sep 15, 2023
59 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants