Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature: Implement theme dependent illustrations (useThemeIllustrations hook) #31452

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Nov 27, 2023

Conversation

chrispader
Copy link
Contributor

@chrispader chrispader commented Nov 16, 2023

@grgia

Details

Adds a new useThemeIllustrations hook which uses the dynamic theme illustrations from the ThemeIllustrationsProvider.

This PR also updates all components in the app that use illustrations

Fixed Issues

$ #21017
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  1. Place the following code snippet into the render function of src/Expensify.js before any early return:
useEffect(() => {
    Onyx.set(ONYXKEYS.PREFERRED_THEME, 'light') // Adapt to "dark" if needed
}, [])
  1. Go to a new report/chat
  2. Check if the placeholder image for empty chats is displayed correctly for the light and dark theme
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as in Tests.

QA Steps

No QA.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari Screenshot 2023-11-17 at 16 33 09 Screenshot 2023-11-20 at 14 14 03 Screenshot 2023-11-20 at 14 16 03
MacOS: Desktop

Only added screenshots for macOS web (Safari) for showcase of test steps...

@chrispader chrispader requested a review from a team as a code owner November 16, 2023 16:27
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from dannymcclain and shubham1206agra and removed request for a team November 16, 2023 16:27
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 16, 2023

@dannymcclain @shubham1206agra One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

@chrispader @grgia Is my review required here?

@grgia grgia self-requested a review November 16, 2023 17:08
Comment on lines 1 to 7
import EmptyStateBackgroundImage from '@assets/images/empty-state_background-fade-light.png';
import Abracadabra from '@assets/images/product-illustrations/abracadabra.svg';
import BankArrowPink from '@assets/images/product-illustrations/bank-arrow--pink.svg';
import BankMouseGreen from '@assets/images/product-illustrations/bank-mouse--green.svg';
import BankUserGreen from '@assets/images/product-illustrations/bank-user--green.svg';
import ConciergeBlue from '@assets/images/product-illustrations/concierge--blue.svg';
import ConciergeExclamation from '@assets/images/product-illustrations/concierge--exclamation.svg';
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@chrispader rather than importing all these images, what if we only used the provider for the theme specific ones and left the rest using the old pattern?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yea sure, wasn't sure if all illustrations are theme-dependent.

once we have a list of all theme-dependent illustrations, i can simply adapt the affected components

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i'd still move the files with the imports to src/styles/illustrations. wdyt?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right now it is looking like it's only the background image, though the list might grow when we do a final QA of the theme. Hb we assume it's only that one for now?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll leave the hook and context as is then and just update the list of imports. I can keep the branch with all of these changes, in case there are more dynamic illustrations coming soon

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@grgia updated the PR accordingly :)

@dannymcclain
Copy link
Contributor

@grgia I honestly don't know what value I can provide as a reviewer here?

@grgia grgia removed the request for review from dannymcclain November 17, 2023 13:08
@grgia
Copy link
Contributor

grgia commented Nov 17, 2023

all good @dannymcclain removed you as a reviewer!

Copy link
Contributor

@grgia grgia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code LGTM,

Let's add test steps to manually change the theme to light mode and check that the background image is correct :)

And then NO QA for QA section

@chrispader
Copy link
Contributor Author

Code LGTM,

Let's add test steps to manually change the theme to light mode and check that the background image is correct :)

And then NO QA for QA section

done @grgia

@grgia
Copy link
Contributor

grgia commented Nov 20, 2023

@chrispader could you add screenshots that show that the background image is correct for both light and dark?

@chrispader
Copy link
Contributor Author

@chrispader could you add screenshots that show that the background image is correct for both light and dark?

may bad, sorry uploaded the wrong screenshot.. added screenshots with the dynamic illustration! @grgia

Copy link
Contributor

@grgia grgia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!!

@grgia
Copy link
Contributor

grgia commented Nov 22, 2023

@shubham1206agra would you be interested in checklist/screenshots to ensure this image loads on dark/light mode on all platforms?

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

Yes I will do it

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

Screenshot 2023-11-22 at 5 05 50 PM Screenshot 2023-11-22 at 5 06 25 PM

@grgia Do I need check these too?

@grgia
Copy link
Contributor

grgia commented Nov 22, 2023

@shubham1206agra which are you referring to?

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

Themes not applied to images shown above

@grgia
Copy link
Contributor

grgia commented Nov 22, 2023

@shubham1206agra the only image that is effected is the background image!

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

Ok then I will ignore these.

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native Screenshot 2023-11-24 at 11 32 33 AM
Android: mWeb Chrome Screenshot 2023-11-24 at 10 58 42 AM
iOS: Native Screenshot 2023-11-24 at 11 13 03 AM
iOS: mWeb Safari Screenshot 2023-11-24 at 10 50 35 AM
MacOS: Chrome / Safari Screenshot 2023-11-24 at 10 47 00 AM
MacOS: Desktop Screenshot 2023-11-24 at 11 05 13 AM

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from grgia November 24, 2023 06:13
@chrispader
Copy link
Contributor Author

can we merge this @grgia ? :)

@grgia grgia merged commit 0a05917 into Expensify:main Nov 27, 2023
16 of 17 checks passed
@chrispader
Copy link
Contributor Author

🎉🎉

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/grgia in version: 1.4.4-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.4.4-3 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants