Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat: Rate limit exempt keys #83

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 11, 2020
Merged

Conversation

nbey
Copy link
Contributor

@nbey nbey commented May 25, 2020

This PR resolves Issue #54

@nbey nbey requested a review from themightychris May 25, 2020 03:32
Copy link
Member

@themightychris themightychris left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great overall, take a pass through though and try to minimize any extra diff content, there are a few more beyond the ones I noted.

Also in the cases where one if block got wrapped in a second, let's combine those and break the conditions out to multiple lines rather than nest everything an extra level deep and touch every line with an indent shift

@nbey
Copy link
Contributor Author

nbey commented Jun 11, 2020

Ok after a few commits worth of chores, I believe the changes have been minimized to what's needed.

The commit history is sorta bloated now, lmk if you want me to create a new branch or clean up the clean ups 😄

@nbey nbey requested a review from themightychris June 11, 2020 20:47
@nbey nbey force-pushed the feat/rate-limit-exempt-keys branch from dee4790 to a5fb25b Compare June 11, 2020 21:39
@themightychris themightychris added this to the v3.1 milestone Jun 11, 2020
@themightychris themightychris merged commit ad23188 into develop Jun 11, 2020
@themightychris themightychris deleted the feat/rate-limit-exempt-keys branch July 21, 2020 04:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants