Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve Git commit behavior on replace() #183

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

dnnr
Copy link

@dnnr dnnr commented Jul 10, 2014

Implement replace() instead of composing remove() and append(), so that
it performs not two independent but a single, concise transaction on the
storage backend. This is generally more efficient and especially
desirable when Git support is enabled.

This change also adds slightly more informative commit messages.

Implement replace() instead of composing remove() and append(), so that
it performs not two independent but a single, concise transaction on the
storage backend. This is generally more efficient and especially
desirable when Git support is enabled.

This change also adds slightly more informative commit messages.
@cristen
Copy link

cristen commented Jul 10, 2014

Concise, neat, perfect. Thanks!

@liZe liZe added this to the 1.0 milestone Jul 28, 2014
@liZe liZe added the Feature label Jul 28, 2014
@vuntz
Copy link
Contributor

vuntz commented Sep 15, 2014

Can you also update the mutlifilesystem backend?

@dnnr
Copy link
Author

dnnr commented Sep 15, 2014

I would, but I'm not entirely sure how the multifilesystem backend is supposed to work, since it doesn't for me. There's already an open bug for this: #150

@vuntz
Copy link
Contributor

vuntz commented Sep 25, 2014

@dnnr I've added commits for this in https://github.com/vuntz/Radicale/commits/multifilesystem-fixes-git ; however, you can't just cherry-pick them as they depend on my changes at #215

@dnnr dnnr mentioned this pull request May 6, 2015
@dnnr dnnr closed this May 6, 2015
@liZe liZe modified the milestones: 2.0, 1.0 Aug 21, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants