Block removal prompt: let consumers pass their own rules #51841
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mcsf
added
[Type] Code Quality
|
Question: should |
|
Size Change: -22.1 kB (-2%) Total Size: 1.42 MB
ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
|
Flaky tests detected in 5601510. 🔍 Workflow run URL: https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/actions/runs/5422056928
|
mcsf
force-pushed
the
update/block-removal-prompt-arch
branch
3 times, most recently
from
4cd7578 to
be5e717
Compare
Following up on #51145, this untangles `edit-site` from `block-editor` by removing the hard-coded set of rules `blockTypePromptMessages` from the generic `BlockRemovalWarningModal` component. Rules are now to be passed to that component by whichever block editor is using it. Names and comments have been updated accordingly and improved.
mcsf
force-pushed
the
update/block-removal-prompt-arch
branch
from
be5e717 to
96cd10a
Compare
Mamaduka
reviewed
Jun 30, 2023
* Better scoping of selectors * No redundant assertions * .toBeHidden instead of .getBlocks logic Props mamaduka
|
Thanks, @mcsf. The changes look good. |
I think not that much and especially since it's a private API right now. |
ntsekouras
reviewed
Jun 30, 2023
ntsekouras
approved these changes
Jun 30, 2023
Props ntsekouras
tellthemachines
added
the
Backport to WP 6.7 Beta/RC
tellthemachines
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2023
* Block removal prompt: let consumers pass their own rules Following up on #51145, this untangles `edit-site` from `block-editor` by removing the hard-coded set of rules `blockTypePromptMessages` from the generic `BlockRemovalWarningModal` component. Rules are now to be passed to that component by whichever block editor is using it. Names and comments have been updated accordingly and improved. * Site editor: Add e2e test for block removal prompt
tellthemachines
removed
the
Backport to WP 6.7 Beta/RC
ramonjd
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2023
* Try restoring the site editor animation (#51956) * Try restoring the site editor animation * fix header animation * Remove accidental addition of layout prop * tidy up formatting * fix animate presence issue * Fix animation between sidebar view and distraction free edit view * Leave sidebar present and maintain canvas to sidebar animation The sidebar is necessary for routing on mobile so we have to maintain its presence in the DOM. Just hiding it isn't enough though, as it is still able to be reached with keyboard tabs and screen readers. Using the relatively new `inert` property disables the element from user interaction, so we add that when we don't want the sidebar to be shown. * Fix mobile view for pattern library On Mobile, the canvas mode wasn't being set to edit when using the pattern library. This updates it to use the showSidbar value instead, keeping it in sync with the inert setting. --------- Co-authored-by: Saxon Fletcher <saxonafletcher@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Jerry Jones <jones.jeremydavid@gmail.com> * Change password input to type text so contents are visible. (#52622) * Iframe: Silence style compat warnings when in a BlockPreview (#52627) * Do not autofocus page title field in the Create new page modal dialog. (#52603) * Use lowercase p in "Manage Patterns" (#52617) * Remove theme patterns title (#52570) * Block editor store: also attach private APIs to old store descriptor (#52088) As a workaround, until #39632 is merged, make sure that private actions and selectors can be unlocked from the original store descriptor (the one created by `createReduxStore`) and not just the one registered in the default registry (created by `registerStore`). Without this workaround, specific setups will unexpectedly fail, such as the action tests in the `reusable-blocks` package, due to the way that those tests create their own registries in which they register stores like `block-editor`. Context: #51145 (comment) Props jsnajdr * Block removal prompt: let consumers pass their own rules (#51841) * Block removal prompt: let consumers pass their own rules Following up on #51145, this untangles `edit-site` from `block-editor` by removing the hard-coded set of rules `blockTypePromptMessages` from the generic `BlockRemovalWarningModal` component. Rules are now to be passed to that component by whichever block editor is using it. Names and comments have been updated accordingly and improved. * Site editor: Add e2e test for block removal prompt * Fix Shift+Tab to Block Toolbar (#52613) * Fix Shift+Tab to Block Toolbar * Add changelog entry * Show warning on removal of Post Template block in the site editor. (#52666) * Avoid copying global style presets via the styles compatibility hook (#52640) * i18n: Make the tab labels of `ColorGradientSettingsDropdown` component translatable (#52669) * Rich Text/Footnotes: fix getRichTextValues for useInnerBlocksProps.save (#52682) * Rich Text/Footnotes: fix getRichTextValues for useInnerBlocksProps.save * Address feedback * Patterns: Remove `reusable` text from menu once rename hint has been dismissed (#52664) * Show uncategorized patterns on the Editor > Patterns page (#52633) * Patterns: fix bug with Create Patterns menu not showing in site editor page editing (#52671) * Pass the root client id into the reusable blocks menu * Check that clientIds array is defined * Make check for array item more specific * Search block: Enqueue view script through block.json (#52552) * Search block: Enqueue view script through block.json * Remove extra space * Use `_get_block_template_file` function and set $area variable. (#52708) * Use `_get_block_template_file` function and set $area variable. * Update packages/block-library/src/template-part/index.php Co-authored-by: Felix Arntz <felixarntz@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Felix Arntz <felixarntz@users.noreply.github.com> * Site Editor: Don't allow creating template part on the Patterns page for non-block themes (#52656) * Don't allow template part to be created on the Patterns page for non-block themes * Remove unnecessary theme directory name in E2E test * Change Delete page menu item to Move to trash. (#52641) * Use relative path internally to include packages in dependencies (#52712) * Spacing Sizes: Fix zero size (#52711) * DimensionsPanel: Fix unexpected value decoding/encoding (#52661) --------- Co-authored-by: Daniel Richards <daniel.richards@automattic.com> Co-authored-by: Saxon Fletcher <saxonafletcher@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Jerry Jones <jones.jeremydavid@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Robert Anderson <robert@noisysocks.com> Co-authored-by: Andrea Fercia <a.fercia@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Rich Tabor <hi@richtabor.com> Co-authored-by: James Koster <james@jameskoster.co.uk> Co-authored-by: Miguel Fonseca <150562+mcsf@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Haz <hazdiego@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: George Mamadashvili <georgemamadashvili@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Aki Hamano <54422211+t-hamano@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Ella <4710635+ellatrix@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Glen Davies <glendaviesnz@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Carolina Nymark <myazalea@hotmail.com> Co-authored-by: Petter Walbø Johnsgård <petter@dekode.no> Co-authored-by: Jonny Harris <spacedmonkey@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Felix Arntz <felixarntz@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Ramon <ramonjd@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Andrew Serong <14988353+andrewserong@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What?
Following up on #51145, this untangles
edit-sitefromblock-editorby removing the hard-coded set of rulesblockTypePromptMessagesfrom the genericBlockRemovalWarningModalcomponent. Rules are now to be passed to that component by whichever block editor is using it.Names and comments have been updated accordingly and improved.
Why?
Lets block editors set up their own rules and improves code quality. Essentially, the
toggleRemovalPromptSupportaction (which only accepted a boolean) was transformed intosetBlockRemovalRules. The semantics change, but the architecture is mostly the same: ultimately, actionprivateRemoveBlockschecks for the existence of rules; if there are any, its confirmation logic kicks in.Testing Instructions
See testing instructions in the original PR: #51145. No behaviour should have changed: the Site Editor should ask the user for confirmation before deleting a selection of blocks containing the Query Loop and/or the Post Content blocks, but other site editors (e.g. Post Editor) should not ask for confirmation.