Improve validation in HTTP parser #8074

Dreamsorcerer · 2024-01-28T16:09:42Z

No description provided.

No functional changes; old and new re.Pattern[str] differ still: >>> re.compile(r"[!#$%&'*+\-.^_`|~0-9A-Za-z]+").pattern "[!#$%&'*+\\-.^_`|~0-9A-Za-z]+" >>> re.compile("[%s0-9A-Za-z]+" % re.escape("!#$%&'*+-.^_`|~")).pattern "[!\\#\\$%\\&'\\*\\+\\-\\.\\^_`\\|\\~0-9A-Za-z]+" re.escape() escapes characters even when they (as of Python 3.12, anyway) lose their special meaning inside character classes anyway.

doing this on Unicode strings instead of on bytes only works when we are not accepting *any* 8-bit characters (otherwise, multibyte sequences ruin it)

PR template demands changes are documented, and changelog demands backwards incompatible changes - which this definitely + intentionally contains - are marked as such.

Based on #3235 (comment)

Co-authored-by: Sviatoslav Sydorenko (Святослав Сидоренко) <sviat@redhat.com>

CI does not like my placeholder, shut it up for now

towncrier-fragments complained

codecov · 2024-01-28T16:17:38Z

Codecov Report

Attention: 30 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (5e44ba4) 97.44% compared to head (6b82936) 97.40%.
Report is 35 commits behind head on master.

Files	Patch %	Lines
tests/test_http_parser.py	62.66%	24 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
aiohttp/http_parser.py	85.71%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #8074      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.44%   97.40%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         107      107              
  Lines       32346    32675     +329     
  Branches     3748     3823      +75     
==========================================
+ Hits        31518    31826     +308     
- Misses        627      641      +14     
- Partials      201      208       +7

Flag	Coverage Δ
CI-GHA	`97.31% <66.29%> (-0.04%)`	⬇️
OS-Linux	`96.98% <66.29%> (-0.04%)`	⬇️
OS-Windows	`95.49% <66.29%> (-0.03%)`	⬇️
OS-macOS	`96.80% <66.29%> (-0.05%)`	⬇️
Py-3.10.11	`95.41% <66.29%> (-0.03%)`	⬇️
Py-3.10.13	`96.80% <66.29%> (-0.04%)`	⬇️
Py-3.11.6	`?`
Py-3.11.7	`96.45% <66.29%> (-0.09%)`	⬇️
Py-3.12.0	`?`
Py-3.12.1	`96.60% <66.29%> (-0.01%)`	⬇️
Py-3.8.10	`95.38% <66.29%> (-0.03%)`	⬇️
Py-3.8.18	`96.73% <66.29%> (-0.04%)`	⬇️
Py-3.9.13	`95.38% <66.29%> (-0.03%)`	⬇️
Py-3.9.18	`96.76% <66.29%> (-0.04%)`	⬇️
Py-pypy7.3.13	`?`
Py-pypy7.3.15	`96.32% <66.29%> (?)`
VM-macos	`96.80% <66.29%> (-0.05%)`	⬇️
VM-ubuntu	`96.98% <66.29%> (-0.04%)`	⬇️
VM-windows	`95.49% <66.29%> (-0.03%)`	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

patchback · 2024-01-28T16:27:51Z

Backport to 3.9: 💔 cherry-picking failed — conflicts found

❌ Failed to cleanly apply 33ccdfb on top of patchback/backports/3.9/33ccdfb0a12690af5bb49bda2319ec0907fa7827/pr-8074

Backporting merged PR #8074 into master

Ensure you have a local repo clone of your fork. Unless you cloned it
from the upstream, this would be your origin remote.
Make sure you have an upstream repo added as a remote too. In these
instructions you'll refer to it by the name upstream. If you don't
have it, here's how you can add it:
```
$ git remote add upstream https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp.git
```

Ensure you have the latest copy of upstream and prepare a branch
that will hold the backported code:

$ git fetch upstream
$ git checkout -b patchback/backports/3.9/33ccdfb0a12690af5bb49bda2319ec0907fa7827/pr-8074 upstream/3.9

Now, cherry-pick PR Improve validation in HTTP parser #8074 contents into that branch:
```
$ git cherry-pick -x 33ccdfb0a12690af5bb49bda2319ec0907fa7827
```
If it'll yell at you with something like fatal: Commit 33ccdfb0a12690af5bb49bda2319ec0907fa7827 is a merge but no -m option was given., add -m 1 as follows instead:
```
$ git cherry-pick -m1 -x 33ccdfb0a12690af5bb49bda2319ec0907fa7827
```
At this point, you'll probably encounter some merge conflicts. You must
resolve them in to preserve the patch from PR Improve validation in HTTP parser #8074 as close to the
original as possible.

Push this branch to your fork on GitHub:

$ git push origin patchback/backports/3.9/33ccdfb0a12690af5bb49bda2319ec0907fa7827/pr-8074

Create a PR, ensure that the CI is green. If it's not — update it so that
the tests and any other checks pass. This is it!
Now relax and wait for the maintainers to process your pull request
when they have some cycles to do reviews. Don't worry — they'll tell you if
any improvements are necessary when the time comes!

🤖 @patchback
I'm built with octomachinery and
my source is open — https://github.com/sanitizers/patchback-github-app.

patchback · 2024-01-28T16:27:57Z

Backport to 3.10: 💔 cherry-picking failed — conflicts found

❌ Failed to cleanly apply 33ccdfb on top of patchback/backports/3.10/33ccdfb0a12690af5bb49bda2319ec0907fa7827/pr-8074

Backporting merged PR #8074 into master

Ensure you have a local repo clone of your fork. Unless you cloned it
from the upstream, this would be your origin remote.
Make sure you have an upstream repo added as a remote too. In these
instructions you'll refer to it by the name upstream. If you don't
have it, here's how you can add it:
```
$ git remote add upstream https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp.git
```

Ensure you have the latest copy of upstream and prepare a branch
that will hold the backported code:

$ git fetch upstream
$ git checkout -b patchback/backports/3.10/33ccdfb0a12690af5bb49bda2319ec0907fa7827/pr-8074 upstream/3.10

Now, cherry-pick PR Improve validation in HTTP parser #8074 contents into that branch:
```
$ git cherry-pick -x 33ccdfb0a12690af5bb49bda2319ec0907fa7827
```
If it'll yell at you with something like fatal: Commit 33ccdfb0a12690af5bb49bda2319ec0907fa7827 is a merge but no -m option was given., add -m 1 as follows instead:
```
$ git cherry-pick -m1 -x 33ccdfb0a12690af5bb49bda2319ec0907fa7827
```
At this point, you'll probably encounter some merge conflicts. You must
resolve them in to preserve the patch from PR Improve validation in HTTP parser #8074 as close to the
original as possible.

Push this branch to your fork on GitHub:

$ git push origin patchback/backports/3.10/33ccdfb0a12690af5bb49bda2319ec0907fa7827/pr-8074

Create a PR, ensure that the CI is green. If it's not — update it so that
the tests and any other checks pass. This is it!
Now relax and wait for the maintainers to process your pull request
when they have some cycles to do reviews. Don't worry — they'll tell you if
any improvements are necessary when the time comes!

🤖 @patchback
I'm built with octomachinery and
my source is open — https://github.com/sanitizers/patchback-github-app.

Co-authored-by: Paul J. Dorn <pajod@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sviatoslav Sydorenko (Святослав Сидоренко) <sviat@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit 33ccdfb)

webknjaz · 2024-01-28T17:11:22Z

tests/test_http_parser.py

+
+
+def test_http_request_bad_status_line_separator(parser: Any) -> None:
+    # single code point, old, multibyte NFKC, multibyte NFKD


Hey @pajod, could you expand what this comment refers to? Does the utf8sep variable contain a value that matches all the listed cases? I'm rather confused. Or did you mean to test different cases but added just one?

That utf8sep has those properties (and LTR), a popular choice for being multiple edge cases in one. None of which are strictly needed for.. comparing to the literal ASCII dot as we do here, but some of which I expect to regain relevance on future refactoring.

webknjaz · 2024-01-28T17:12:43Z

tests/test_http_parser.py

@@ -710,6 +808,31 @@ def test_http_request_upgrade(parser: Any) -> None:
    assert tail == b"some raw data"


+def test_http_request_parser_utf8_request_line(parser: Any) -> None:
+    if not isinstance(response, HttpResponseParserPy):


@pajod FYI it's much cleaner to use the @pytest.mark.xfail decorator since it allows pytest to make the decisions earlier in the process.

But that only explains why a llhttp-only code coverage report complains!? There is something much more wrong here. Like, I completely broke that test levels of wrong.

Edit: Sorry, I did. Four times. I meant to acknowledge (in two cases, expected to be changed) behaviour differences of the C parser, while keeping my tests parametrized to keep running both parsers anyway. But each time I copied the not isinstance(response, HttpResponseParserPy) line where it should say not isinstance(parser, HttpRequestParserPy). And mypy would have told me, if not for that Any and the duplicate use of the response identifier (global scope function but also function scope variable)

Yeah, I noticed there was no coverage on these tests for some reason. Something to look at later.

Yep. I started looking into the coverage drop and that's how I noticed this thing.

FWIW we really should refactor how the tests with and without extensions are parametrized/generated, like I did in multidict recently. Essentially, there was an import loop in some places in tests that prevented C-extension tests from being executed (aio-libs/multidict#837 / aio-libs/multidict#915 / https://multidict.aio-libs.org/en/latest/changes/#contributor-facing-changes). So I fixed that by having an explicit global option for requiring one mode or the other, with a collection of fixtures reused everywhere and zero magic around import attempts and handling failures in weird ways.

Another thing I configured is the module classification in Codecov with different expected coverage thresholds — the goal should be that tests get 100% coverage in every CI run (from all jobs combined, of course). And the actual project code coverage should be measured as a separate metric. Currently, a global threshold value allows coverage to drop in tests if it's compensated by coverage in the project, meaning that we may be gaining more dead code (read: tests that are never executed), which results in a false sense of things being tested, when they aren't.

[![Mend Renovate](https://app.renovatebot.com/images/banner.svg)](https://renovatebot.com) This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Change | Age | Adoption | Passing | Confidence | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | [aiohttp](https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp) | `==3.9.1` -> `==3.9.2` | [![age](https://developer.mend.io/api/mc/badges/age/pypi/aiohttp/3.9.2?slim=true)](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [![adoption](https://developer.mend.io/api/mc/badges/adoption/pypi/aiohttp/3.9.2?slim=true)](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [![passing](https://developer.mend.io/api/mc/badges/compatibility/pypi/aiohttp/3.9.1/3.9.2?slim=true)](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [![confidence](https://developer.mend.io/api/mc/badges/confidence/pypi/aiohttp/3.9.1/3.9.2?slim=true)](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | ### GitHub Vulnerability Alerts #### [CVE-2024-23829](https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/security/advisories/GHSA-8qpw-xqxj-h4r2) ### Summary Security-sensitive parts of the *Python HTTP parser* retained minor differences in allowable character sets, that must trigger error handling to robustly match frame boundaries of proxies in order to protect against injection of additional requests. Additionally, validation could trigger exceptions that were not handled consistently with processing of other malformed input. ### Details These problems are rooted in pattern matching protocol elements, previously improved by PR #3235 and GHSA-gfw2-4jvh-wgfg: 1. The expression `HTTP/(\d).(\d)` lacked another backslash to clarify that the separator should be a literal dot, not just *any* Unicode code point (result: `HTTP/(\d)\.(\d)`). 2. The HTTP version was permitting Unicode digits, where only ASCII digits are standards-compliant. 3. Distinct regular expressions for validating HTTP Method and Header field names were used - though both should (at least) apply the common restrictions of rfc9110 `token`. ### PoC `GET / HTTP/1ö1` `GET / HTTP/1.𝟙` `GET/: HTTP/1.1` `Content-Encoding?: chunked` ### Impact Primarily concerns running an aiohttp server without llhttp: 1. **behind a proxy**: Being more lenient than internet standards require could, depending on deployment environment, assist in request smuggling. 2. **directly accessible** or exposed behind proxies relaying malformed input: the unhandled exception could cause excessive resource consumption on the application server and/or its logging facilities. ----- Patch: [https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/pull/8074](https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/pull/8074)/files #### [CVE-2024-23334](https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/security/advisories/GHSA-5h86-8mv2-jq9f) ### Summary Improperly configuring static resource resolution in aiohttp when used as a web server can result in the unauthorized reading of arbitrary files on the system. ### Details When using aiohttp as a web server and configuring static routes, it is necessary to specify the root path for static files. Additionally, the option 'follow_symlinks' can be used to determine whether to follow symbolic links outside the static root directory. When 'follow_symlinks' is set to True, there is no validation to check if a given file path is within the root directory.This can lead to directory traversal vulnerabilities, resulting in unauthorized access to arbitrary files on the system, even when symlinks are not present. i.e. An application is only vulnerable with setup code like: ``` app.router.add_routes([ web.static("/static", "static/", follow_symlinks=True), # Remove follow_symlinks to avoid the vulnerability ]) ``` ### Impact This is a directory traversal vulnerability with CWE ID 22. When using aiohttp as a web server and enabling static resource resolution with `follow_symlinks` set to True, it can lead to this vulnerability. This vulnerability has been present since the introduction of the `follow_symlinks` parameter. ### Workaround Even if upgrading to a patched version of aiohttp, we recommend following these steps regardless. If using `follow_symlinks=True` outside of a restricted local development environment, disable the option immediately. This option is NOT needed to follow symlinks which point to a location _within_ the static root directory, it is _only_ intended to allow a symlink to break out of the static directory. Even with this CVE fixed, there is still a substantial risk of misconfiguration when using this option on a server that accepts requests from remote users. Additionally, aiohttp has always recommended using a reverse proxy server (such as nginx) to handle static resources and _not_ to use these static resources in aiohttp for production environments. Doing so also protects against this vulnerability, and is why we expect the number of affected users to be very low. ----- Patch: [https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/pull/8079](https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/pull/8079)/files --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>aio-libs/aiohttp (aiohttp)</summary> ### [`v3.9.2`](https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/releases/tag/v3.9.2): 3.9.2 [Compare Source](https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/compare/v3.9.1...v3.9.2) ## Bug fixes - Fixed server-side websocket connection leak. *Related issues and pull requests on GitHub:* [#7978](https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/issues/7978). - Fixed `web.FileResponse` doing blocking I/O in the event loop. *Related issues and pull requests on GitHub:* [#8012](https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/issues/8012). - Fixed double compress when compression enabled and compressed file exists in server file responses. *Related issues and pull requests on GitHub:* [#8014](https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/issues/8014). - Added runtime type check for `ClientSession` `timeout` parameter. *Related issues and pull requests on GitHub:* [#8021](https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/issues/8021). - Fixed an unhandled exception in the Python HTTP parser on header lines starting with a colon -- by :user:`pajod`. Invalid request lines with anything but a dot between the HTTP major and minor version are now rejected. Invalid header field names containing question mark or slash are now rejected. Such requests are incompatible with :rfc:`9110#section-5.6.2` and are not known to be of any legitimate use. *Related issues and pull requests on GitHub:* [#8074](https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/issues/8074). - Improved validation of paths for static resources requests to the server -- by :user:`bdraco`. *Related issues and pull requests on GitHub:* [#8079](https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/issues/8079). ## Features - Added support for passing :py:data:`True` to `ssl` parameter in `ClientSession` while deprecating :py:data:`None` -- by :user:`xiangyan99`. *Related issues and pull requests on GitHub:* [#7698](https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/issues/7698). ## Breaking changes - Fixed an unhandled exception in the Python HTTP parser on header lines starting with a colon -- by :user:`pajod`. Invalid request lines with anything but a dot between the HTTP major and minor version are now rejected. Invalid header field names containing question mark or slash are now rejected. Such requests are incompatible with :rfc:`9110#section-5.6.2` and are not known to be of any legitimate use. *Related issues and pull requests on GitHub:* [#8074](https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/issues/8074). ## Improved documentation - Fixed examples of `fallback_charset_resolver` function in the :doc:`client_advanced` document. -- by :user:`henry0312`. *Related issues and pull requests on GitHub:* [#7995](https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/issues/7995). - The Sphinx setup was updated to avoid showing the empty changelog draft section in the tagged release documentation builds on Read The Docs -- by :user:`webknjaz`. *Related issues and pull requests on GitHub:* [#8067](https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/issues/8067). ## Packaging updates and notes for downstreams - The changelog categorization was made clearer. The contributors can now mark their fragment files more accurately -- by :user:`webknjaz`. The new category tags are: * ``bugfix`` * ``feature`` * ``deprecation`` * ``breaking`` (previously, ``removal``) * ``doc`` * ``packaging`` * ``contrib`` * ``misc`` *Related issues and pull requests on GitHub:* [#8066](https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/issues/8066). ## Contributor-facing changes - Updated :ref:`contributing/Tests coverage <aiohttp-contributing>` section to show how we use `codecov` -- by :user:`Dreamsorcerer`. *Related issues and pull requests on GitHub:* [#7916](https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/issues/7916). - The changelog categorization was made clearer. The contributors can now mark their fragment files more accurately -- by :user:`webknjaz`. The new category tags are: * ``bugfix`` * ``feature`` * ``deprecation`` * ``breaking`` (previously, ``removal``) * ``doc`` * ``packaging`` * ``contrib`` * ``misc`` *Related issues and pull requests on GitHub:* [#8066](https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/issues/8066). ## Miscellaneous internal changes - Replaced all `tmpdir` fixtures with `tmp_path` in test suite. *Related issues and pull requests on GitHub:* [#3551](https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/issues/3551). *** </details> --- ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined). 🚦 **Automerge**: Enabled. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again. --- - [ ] If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box --- This PR has been generated by [Mend Renovate](https://www.mend.io/free-developer-tools/renovate/). View repository job log [here](https://developer.mend.io/github/allenporter/pyrainbird).  Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

pajod and others added 23 commits December 18, 2023 12:26

http_parser: test edge cases

dc567ba

http_parser: enforce HTTP version & header sep

00cb2a2

http_parser: test edge cases (v2)

e0dde7c

use identical re.Pattern to validate method/header

e2b0483

doing this on Unicode strings instead of on bytes only works when we are not accepting *any* 8-bit characters (otherwise, multibyte sequences ruin it)

FIXME: rename CHANGES/*.bugfix before merging

b38306b

FIXME: rename CHANGES/*.bugfix before merging

ea85a3c

PR template demands changes are documented, and changelog demands backwards incompatible changes - which this definitely + intentionally contains - are marked as such.

http_parser: test edge cases (v3)

f0314ca

Based on #3235 (comment)

𝟭/𝟏/𝟷/1/𝟣/１/۱/𝟙

70cd60e

typo, whitespace

4878638

Update aiohttp/http_parser.py

372fe5b

Update http_parser.py

43c127a

xfail in tests: just expect no exception, these will remain unchanged

4e8306c

example: additional unicode confusion

9234224

FIXME: rename CHANGES/*.bugfix before merging

39549e5

Co-authored-by: Sviatoslav Sydorenko (Святослав Сидоренко) <sviat@redhat.com>

CI: 3.8 compat typings, silence but not un-parametrize regression test

ddb4bc2

CI: un-parametrize the other broken request, too

dd4bdc4

style: name plus-suffixed patterns with plural S

c38e243

style: must not name the one and only encoding

8cc25ff

CI: not a spelling mistake

75b4489

FIXME: rename CHANGES/*.bugfix before merging

d1b746f

CI does not like my placeholder, shut it up for now

FIXME: rename CHANGES/*.bugfix before merging

480fc51

towncrier-fragments complained

CI: xfail the empty case for C parser

5ecbf79

Dreamsorcerer added backport-3.9 labels Jan 28, 2024

Dreamsorcerer requested review from webknjaz and asvetlov as code owners January 28, 2024 16:09

psf-chronographer bot added the bot:chronographer:provided There is a change note present in this PR label Jan 28, 2024

Rename 0.bugfix to 8074.bugfix.rst

6b82936

Dreamsorcerer enabled auto-merge (squash) January 28, 2024 16:24

Dreamsorcerer merged commit 33ccdfb into master Jan 28, 2024
28 of 32 checks passed

Dreamsorcerer deleted the thing1 branch January 28, 2024 16:27

webknjaz reviewed Jan 28, 2024

View reviewed changes

pajod mentioned this pull request Jan 29, 2024

re-enable 4 tests, accidentally dropped #8088

Merged

5 tasks

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Improve validation in HTTP parser #8074

Improve validation in HTTP parser #8074

Dreamsorcerer commented Jan 28, 2024

codecov bot commented Jan 28, 2024 •

edited

Loading

patchback bot commented Jan 28, 2024 •

edited

Loading

patchback bot commented Jan 28, 2024 •

edited

Loading

webknjaz Jan 28, 2024

pajod Jan 28, 2024 •

edited

Loading

webknjaz Jan 28, 2024

pajod Jan 28, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Dreamsorcerer Jan 28, 2024

webknjaz Jan 28, 2024 •

edited

Loading



		def test_http_request_bad_status_line_separator(parser: Any) -> None:
		# single code point, old, multibyte NFKC, multibyte NFKD

Improve validation in HTTP parser #8074

Improve validation in HTTP parser #8074

Conversation

Dreamsorcerer commented Jan 28, 2024

codecov bot commented Jan 28, 2024 • edited Loading

Codecov Report

patchback bot commented Jan 28, 2024 • edited Loading

Backport to 3.9: 💔 cherry-picking failed — conflicts found

Backporting merged PR #8074 into master

patchback bot commented Jan 28, 2024 • edited Loading

Backport to 3.10: 💔 cherry-picking failed — conflicts found

Backporting merged PR #8074 into master

webknjaz Jan 28, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

pajod Jan 28, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

webknjaz Jan 28, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

pajod Jan 28, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Dreamsorcerer Jan 28, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

webknjaz Jan 28, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codecov bot commented Jan 28, 2024 •

edited

Loading

patchback bot commented Jan 28, 2024 •

edited

Loading

patchback bot commented Jan 28, 2024 •

edited

Loading

pajod Jan 28, 2024 •

edited

Loading

pajod Jan 28, 2024 •

edited

Loading

webknjaz Jan 28, 2024 •

edited

Loading