-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 276
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Promote next
branch to dev
; make 2.x our default development branch
#6576
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Dylan Anthony <dylan@apollographql.com>
license enforcement now uses the expanded supergraph so we need to ensure that the connect link (serialized as join__directive) ends up in the schema
This commit fixes an issue with a downstream dependency (aws-lc-sys) caused by using an old version of GCC by updating the base CircleCI image to current. This was realistically a long-time coming because the previous tag of stable was deprecated in favor of current back in 2022. Below is a quote from the docker hub page explaining the change to the tag names: current - This image tag points to the latest, production ready base image. This is a replacement for the old stable tag. This image should be used by projects that want a decent level of stability but would like to get occasional software updates. It is typically updated once a month. Co-authored-by: Lenny Burdette <lenny@apollographql.com>
CI performance tests
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tests pass so sure!
🎉 |
We had to also land #6587, for those who are curious how stacked PRs will behave when you have "delete" branch protection rules in place. ;) |
Router 2.x has been under active development for nearly a year now and the
next
branch on this repository has been the place in which development has been taking place; while not always obvious, 198 PRs opened on this repository over the last many months (this link may change after this PR merges, but the number is right!) have been targetingnext
.During that 2.x development, the
dev
branch (the default branch on this repository) has remained the location that 1.x work was taking place. We have continually been merging work fromdev
(1.x) intonext
(2.x) to ensure relevant work manifests in both places.As work on 2.x is becoming closer to "release ready" and 1.x is getting closer to moving into our "maintenance LTS". This means that the substantive portion of work has pivoted; the vast majority of development is desired to take place on 2.x rather than 1.x and we want to update our branches to reflect that — as has always been the eventual plan.
With that context in mind, the time has come to:
1.x
branchdev
branch become 2.x work (and the new "default" target).To make that outcome true, this PR is the
secondthird ofthreefour steps which we are taking:main
is up to date withdev
.dev
intonext
, resolving any merge conflicts to fit into the "2.x outcome" satisfactorily.next
intodev
as a true merge, dissolving the (current) existence ofnext
(indefinitely for now, though it may be back when 3.x comes around!l) and causing PRs targetingnext
to instead re-base themselves ondev
.1.x
branch which will be the target for patches which become necessary to land on the 1.x This likely won't manifest as a PR since it'll effectively be pushing a new branch. There will, however, be some manual adjustments to our branch protection rules to enforce protections on that branch which also exist onnext
anddev
.As noted above, by using this PR to merge
next
intodev
, it will automatically re-target all open PRs currently targetingnext
to instead be targetingdev
, which is the desired outcome since those PRs are improvements to the 2.x line. This will be indirectly be taking advantage of GitHub's stacked PR merging mechanism.