Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: added JSON files linting check #35395

Merged

Conversation

NilanshBansal
Copy link
Contributor

@NilanshBansal NilanshBansal commented Aug 5, 2024

Description

This PR adds the spotless formatter and validator for the JSON files present in the project. If there is any invalid JSON file, the formatter fails and logs the file and the error LOC to be fixed.
Since Spotless is already added to the pre-commit hook it also makes it necessary to fix the JSON and then commit the changes.

Screenshot of the errors displayed for Invalid JSONs
image

Why is this Important?

All of our datasource forms appear on the UI from the JSON configuration files in the plugins. If an Invalid JSON is added, it can break the datasource usage experience for the users.
One such instance happened in the past, where due to a JSON formatting error, the users could not use Smart Substitution feature on production.
Reference

Fixes #34969

Automation

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"

🔍 Cypress test results

Tip

🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10243164292
Commit: 08bc87a
Cypress dashboard.
Tags: @tag.Sanity
Spec:


Mon, 05 Aug 2024 05:50:07 UTC

Communication

Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?

  • Yes
  • No

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 5, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited to specific labels.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog Integrations Product Issues related to a specific integration Integrations Pod General Issues related to the Integrations Pod that don't fit into other tags. Task A simple Todo labels Aug 5, 2024
@NilanshBansal NilanshBansal requested review from rishabhrathod01 and removed request for a team, sharat87 and sondermanish August 5, 2024 05:28
@NilanshBansal NilanshBansal self-assigned this Aug 5, 2024
@NilanshBansal NilanshBansal added the ok-to-test Required label for CI label Aug 5, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 5, 2024

Failed server tests

  • com.appsmith.server.solutions.AuthenticationServiceTest#testGetAuthorizationCodeURL_missingDatasource

1 similar comment
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 5, 2024

Failed server tests

  • com.appsmith.server.solutions.AuthenticationServiceTest#testGetAuthorizationCodeURL_missingDatasource

Copy link
Contributor

@rishabhrathod01 rishabhrathod01 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@NilanshBansal NilanshBansal merged commit 486662a into release Aug 5, 2024
45 checks passed
@NilanshBansal NilanshBansal deleted the chore/issue-34969/added-spotless-json-linting branch August 5, 2024 06:26
rahulbarwal added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2024
NilanshBansal added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2024
abhvsn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2024
Reverts #35395
Reverting this PR as the formatter changes the sorting order of the keys
of our JSONs which affects our UI.
Ref:
https://theappsmith.slack.com/archives/CGBPVEJ5C/p1722929754593669?thread_ts=1722916121.682699&cid=CGBPVEJ5C
NilanshBansal added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2024
## Description
This PR adds the spotless formatter and validator for the JSON files
present in the project. If there is any invalid JSON file, the formatter
fails and logs the file and the error LOC to be fixed.
It uses the `prettier JSON` formatted in spotless for the same.
Since Spotless is already added to the pre-commit hook it also makes it
necessary to fix the JSON and then commit the changes.

- The prettier JSON formattor preserves the order of the keys.
- Indendation of 2 spaces has been added in the config

Screenshot of the errors displayed for Invalid JSONs
<img width="1427" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/00bbd61c-7414-4787-b9ac-2f0d392f6f33">

### Last attempt to resolve this issue
The formatted used was `simple JSON` which led to change in order of
JSON keys.
PR: #35395
Ref:
https://theappsmith.slack.com/archives/CGBPVEJ5C/p1722929754593669?thread_ts=1722916121.682699&cid=CGBPVEJ5C


Fixes #34969 

## Automation

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"

### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results  -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10264348935>
> Commit: 4957b64
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10264348935&attempt=2"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.All`
> Spec:
> <hr>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 12:40:47 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results  -->


## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Integrations Pod General Issues related to the Integrations Pod that don't fit into other tags. Integrations Product Issues related to a specific integration ok-to-test Required label for CI skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog Task A simple Todo
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Task]: Add linting checks for JSON configs to avoid parsing errors
2 participants