refactor(yaml): prepare for noUncheckedIndexedAccess
#4457
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
iuioiua
suggested changes
Mar 10, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you please justify non-trivial non-null assertions? No comment is needed for trivial ones.
Also, I think we can omit some non-null assertions within loops by instead changing the loop conditions.
Sidenote: looking through this module makes me realise how much room for improvement there is.
|
I refactored a bit the for-loops to improve readability, removing some |
iuioiua
suggested changes
Mar 11, 2024
This reverts commit ec9bd21.
iuioiua
approved these changes
Mar 11, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ref: #4040