Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exposed preserveFocus on OutputChannel#show. #8243

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 30, 2020

Conversation

kittaakos
Copy link
Contributor

@kittaakos kittaakos commented Jul 27, 2020

What it does

  • Exposed preserveFocus on OutputChannel#show. From now on, calling show with preserveFocus true will ensure that the Output widget is revealed but not activated. The default behavior remains preserveFocus false which will reveal and activate the widget.
  • Removed OutputWidget#setInput; it is automatically wired into show.

How to test

  • Reset the workbench layout.

  • Run Show channel (command, explicit, preserve-focus) -> Output view is revealed but not active.

  • Reset the workbench layout.

  • Run Show channel (API, explicit, preserve-focus) -> Output view is revealed but not active.

  • Run Hide Output Channel..., select the API Sample: my test channel -> The Output is active but the input is not the API Sample: my test channel.

  • Run Show Output Channel..., select the API Sample: my test channel -> The Output is active and the input is the API Sample: my test channel.

  • Reset the workbench layout.

  • Run Show channel (command, implicit, no preserve-focus) -> Output is active.

  • Reset the workbench layout.

  • Run Show channel (command, explicit, no preserve focus) -> Output is active.

  • Reset the workbench layout.

  • Run Show channel (API, implicit, no preserve-focus) -> Output is active.

  • Reset the workbench layout.

  • Run Show channel (API, explicit, no preserve-focus) -> Output is active.

Review checklist

Reminder for reviewers

@akosyakov akosyakov added the output issues related to the output label Jul 28, 2020
@akosyakov
Copy link
Member

akosyakov commented Jul 28, 2020

We usually use activate?: boolean to indicate whether focus should be given or not. Is there a reason to use other naming?

nvm it seems to be before like that too

import { Emitter, Event, Disposable, DisposableCollection } from '@theia/core';
import { QuickPickItem } from '@theia/core/lib/common/quick-pick-service';
import { MonacoEditorModel } from '@theia/monaco/lib/browser/monaco-editor-model';
import { MonacoTextModelService, IReference } from '@theia/monaco/lib/browser/monaco-text-model-service';
import { OutputUri } from './output-uri';
import { OutputCommands } from '../browser/output-contribution';
import { OutputCommands, OutputContribution } from '../browser/output-contribution';
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

dependency to browser code from common

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for keeping an eye on everything ;) It's a known issue: #4306

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you want me to move the modules from common to browser? I do not mind moving them now, but it's a breaking change. This PR most likely won't make it to the next release anyways.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As you want.

@inject(QuickPickService)
protected readonly quickPickService: QuickPickService;

@inject(MonacoTextModelService)
protected readonly textModelService: MonacoTextModelService;

@inject(OutputContribution)
protected readonly outputContribution: OutputContribution;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think that channel should know anything about contribution managing it

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you give some pointers besides saying you do not like this approach? Thanks!

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sorry, I commented here: #8243 (comment)

this.channelWasShownEmitter.fire({ name });
const reveal = true;
const activate = !preserveFocus;
await this.outputContribution.openView({ reveal, activate });
Copy link
Member

@akosyakov akosyakov Jul 28, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think the original idea was that channel represents the state which the contribution should listen to and react. The channel should NOT depend on concrete views.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, this makes sense. 👍

if (model && model.uri.toString() === selectedChannel.uri.toString()) {
if (!preserveFocus) {
MessageLoop.sendMessage(editorWidget, Widget.Msg.ActivateRequest);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

usually activation is done via ApplicationShell.activate. It makes sure to activate all widgets in parent-child order.

It is strange that the widget itself reacts and try to update visibility/focus without knowing visibility/activation state of its parents.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

activate all widgets in parent-child order.

Hmm, that's interesting. We use the MessageLoop.sendMessage(myWidget, Widget.Msg.ActivateRequest); construct overalll the application:

  • view container,
  • terminal,
  • scm,
  • siw,
  • editor preview.

What's wrong with this one?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see; you're right. Let me check why it was needed. Thanks for the heads-up.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are you sure? I think it is the only place where we use it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, you're right.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Widget should implement how it is activated in onActivateRequest, but activation is done via ApplicationShell.activate. It will analyze what are parents (areas, tabs, composite widgets) of widgets and reveal/activate them first after that it will ask the widget to activate.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It does not seem to be caused by your changes though, so probably out of the scope to refactor it. I guess it works because there is another path running in parallel making sure that the output view is visible and activated.

@kittaakos kittaakos force-pushed the output--fix-preserve-focus branch 2 times, most recently from f26e217 to b2bf7b1 Compare July 28, 2020 09:26
@kittaakos
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the feedback, @akosyakov. I updated the PR.
@amiramw, do you happen to have time helping us out with the Output verification?

@@ -16,26 +16,83 @@
import { FrontendApplicationContribution } from '@theia/core/lib/browser';
import { inject, injectable, interfaces } from 'inversify';
import { OutputChannelManager, OutputChannelSeverity } from '@theia/output/lib/common/output-channel';
import { CommandContribution, CommandRegistry } from '@theia/core/lib/common/command';
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the name of this file should be changed now since it does not only test the severities, right?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point, but the corresponding commit will be dropped from the PR.

@@ -93,13 +94,16 @@ export class OutputWidget extends BaseWidget implements StatefulWidget {
this.onStateChangedEmitter.fire(this._state);
}

protected async refreshEditorWidget(): Promise<void> {
protected async refreshEditorWidget({ preserveFocus }: { preserveFocus: boolean } = { preserveFocus: false }): Promise<void> {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why not have boolean argument instead of object with single boolean property?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can easily extend it without breaking the API in the future; it's pretty common that we use an object instead of a single property. I can make the change, though. I am OK with both.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i'm ok with both if we think it might expand in the future. consider having a named interface so it is more readable.

@amiramw
Copy link
Member

amiramw commented Jul 28, 2020

Thanks for the feedback, @akosyakov. I updated the PR.
@amiramw, do you happen to have time helping us out with the Output verification?

Tested new functionality and it work. Recent severity changes also seems to work.

@kittaakos
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tested new functionality and it work. Recent severity changes also seems to work.

Thanks a lot for your help, @amiramw 🙏

CHANGELOG.md Outdated
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ Breaking Changes:
<a name="1_4_0_deprecate_languages"></a>
- [[languages]](#1_4_0_deprecate_languages) `@theia/languages` extension is deprecated, use VS Code extensions to provide language smartness:
https://code.visualstudio.com/api/language-extensions/language-server-extension-guide [#8112](https://github.com/eclipse-theia/theia/pull/8112)
- [output] `OutputWidget#setInput` has been removed. The _Output_ view automatically shows the channel when calling `OutputChannel#show`. Moved the `OutputCommands` namespace from the `output-contribution` to its dedicated `output-commands` module to overcome a DI cycle. [#8243](https://github.com/eclipse-theia/theia/pull/8243)
Copy link
Member

@akosyakov akosyakov Jul 28, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we could simple reference a command by string? commands' ids are apis and cannot be changed easily anyway

Copy link
Member

@akosyakov akosyakov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

code changes look to me

@kittaakos
Copy link
Contributor Author

kittaakos commented Jul 28, 2020

This PR is on hold until the next release; 30.7.

Edit: I am going to drop the API-sample commit after the release: #8243 (comment)

@akosyakov
Copy link
Member

This PR is on hold until the next release; 30.7.

We should not forget to move changes to 1.5.0 in CHANGELOG for such PRs.

@kittaakos
Copy link
Contributor Author

We should not forget to move changes to 1.5.0 in CHANGELOG for such PRs.

Sure. It will be a conflict after the release.

From now on, calling `show` with `preserveFocus` `true` will ensure that
the Output widget is revealed but not activated.
The default behavior remains `preserveFocus` `false` which will reveal
and activate the widget.

Removed `OutputWidget#setInput`; it is automatically wired into `show`.

Signed-off-by: Akos Kitta <kittaakos@typefox.io>
@kittaakos kittaakos merged commit e99e386 into master Jul 30, 2020
@kittaakos kittaakos deleted the output--fix-preserve-focus branch August 18, 2020 10:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
output issues related to the output
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants