[Fizz] Reset error component stack and fix error messages #27456
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
facebook-github-bot
added
CLA Signed
React Core Team
sebmarkbage
force-pushed
the
errorstacks
branch
from
2e7cef5 to
35f1d0f
Compare
gnoff
approved these changes
Oct 4, 2023
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 4, 2023
The way we collect component stacks right now are pretty fragile. We expect that we'll call captureBoundaryErrorDetailsDev whenever an error happens. That resets lastBoundaryErrorComponentStackDev to null but if we don't, it just lingers and we don't set it to anything new then which leaks the previous component stack into the next time we have an error. So we need to reset it in a bunch of places. This is still broken with erroredReplay because it has the inverse problem that abortRemainingReplayNodes can call captureBoundaryErrorDetailsDev more than one time. So the second boundary won't get a stack. We probably should try to figure out an alternative way to carry along the stack. Perhaps WeakMap keyed by the error object. This also fixes an issue where we weren't invoking the onShellReady event if we error a replay. That event is a bit weird for resuming because we're probably really supposed to just invoke it immediately if we have already flushed the shell in the prerender which is always atm. Right now, it gets invoked later than necessary because you could have a resumed hole ready before a sibling in the shell is ready and that's blocked. DiffTrain build for [0fba3ec](0fba3ec)
Umeshmalik
pushed a commit
to Umeshmalik/react
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2023
…7456) The way we collect component stacks right now are pretty fragile. We expect that we'll call captureBoundaryErrorDetailsDev whenever an error happens. That resets lastBoundaryErrorComponentStackDev to null but if we don't, it just lingers and we don't set it to anything new then which leaks the previous component stack into the next time we have an error. So we need to reset it in a bunch of places. This is still broken with erroredReplay because it has the inverse problem that abortRemainingReplayNodes can call captureBoundaryErrorDetailsDev more than one time. So the second boundary won't get a stack. We probably should try to figure out an alternative way to carry along the stack. Perhaps WeakMap keyed by the error object. This also fixes an issue where we weren't invoking the onShellReady event if we error a replay. That event is a bit weird for resuming because we're probably really supposed to just invoke it immediately if we have already flushed the shell in the prerender which is always atm. Right now, it gets invoked later than necessary because you could have a resumed hole ready before a sibling in the shell is ready and that's blocked.
alunyov
pushed a commit
to alunyov/react
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 11, 2023
…7456) The way we collect component stacks right now are pretty fragile. We expect that we'll call captureBoundaryErrorDetailsDev whenever an error happens. That resets lastBoundaryErrorComponentStackDev to null but if we don't, it just lingers and we don't set it to anything new then which leaks the previous component stack into the next time we have an error. So we need to reset it in a bunch of places. This is still broken with erroredReplay because it has the inverse problem that abortRemainingReplayNodes can call captureBoundaryErrorDetailsDev more than one time. So the second boundary won't get a stack. We probably should try to figure out an alternative way to carry along the stack. Perhaps WeakMap keyed by the error object. This also fixes an issue where we weren't invoking the onShellReady event if we error a replay. That event is a bit weird for resuming because we're probably really supposed to just invoke it immediately if we have already flushed the shell in the prerender which is always atm. Right now, it gets invoked later than necessary because you could have a resumed hole ready before a sibling in the shell is ready and that's blocked.
gnoff
added a commit
to gnoff/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 13, 2023
- facebook/react#27514 - facebook/react#27511 - facebook/react#27508 - facebook/react#27502 - facebook/react#27474 - facebook/react#26789 - facebook/react#27500 - facebook/react#27488 - facebook/react#27458 - facebook/react#27471 - facebook/react#27470 - facebook/react#27464 - facebook/react#27456 - facebook/react#27462 - facebook/react#27461 - facebook/react#27460 - facebook/react#27459 - facebook/react#27454 - facebook/react#27457 - facebook/react#27453 - facebook/react#27401 - facebook/react#27443 - facebook/react#27445 - facebook/react#27364 - facebook/react#27440 - facebook/react#27436
gnoff
added a commit
to gnoff/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 13, 2023
- facebook/react#27513 - facebook/react#27514 - facebook/react#27511 - facebook/react#27508 - facebook/react#27502 - facebook/react#27474 - facebook/react#26789 - facebook/react#27500 - facebook/react#27488 - facebook/react#27458 - facebook/react#27471 - facebook/react#27470 - facebook/react#27464 - facebook/react#27456 - facebook/react#27462 - facebook/react#27461 - facebook/react#27460 - facebook/react#27459 - facebook/react#27454 - facebook/react#27457 - facebook/react#27453 - facebook/react#27401 - facebook/react#27443 - facebook/react#27445 - facebook/react#27364 - facebook/react#27440 - facebook/react#27436
gnoff
added a commit
to gnoff/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 13, 2023
- facebook/react#27513 - facebook/react#27514 - facebook/react#27511 - facebook/react#27508 - facebook/react#27502 - facebook/react#27474 - facebook/react#26789 - facebook/react#27500 - facebook/react#27488 - facebook/react#27458 - facebook/react#27471 - facebook/react#27470 - facebook/react#27464 - facebook/react#27456 - facebook/react#27462 - facebook/react#27461 - facebook/react#27460 - facebook/react#27459 - facebook/react#27454 - facebook/react#27457 - facebook/react#27453 - facebook/react#27401 - facebook/react#27443 - facebook/react#27445 - facebook/react#27364 - facebook/react#27440 - facebook/react#27436
gnoff
added a commit
to gnoff/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 13, 2023
- facebook/react#27513 - facebook/react#27514 - facebook/react#27511 - facebook/react#27508 - facebook/react#27502 - facebook/react#27474 - facebook/react#26789 - facebook/react#27500 - facebook/react#27488 - facebook/react#27458 - facebook/react#27471 - facebook/react#27470 - facebook/react#27464 - facebook/react#27456 - facebook/react#27462 - facebook/react#27461 - facebook/react#27460 - facebook/react#27459 - facebook/react#27454 - facebook/react#27457 - facebook/react#27453 - facebook/react#27401 - facebook/react#27443 - facebook/react#27445 - facebook/react#27364 - facebook/react#27440 - facebook/react#27436
gnoff
added a commit
to gnoff/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 16, 2023
- facebook/react#27513 - facebook/react#27514 - facebook/react#27511 - facebook/react#27508 - facebook/react#27502 - facebook/react#27474 - facebook/react#26789 - facebook/react#27500 - facebook/react#27488 - facebook/react#27458 - facebook/react#27471 - facebook/react#27470 - facebook/react#27464 - facebook/react#27456 - facebook/react#27462 - facebook/react#27461 - facebook/react#27460 - facebook/react#27459 - facebook/react#27454 - facebook/react#27457 - facebook/react#27453 - facebook/react#27401 - facebook/react#27443 - facebook/react#27445 - facebook/react#27364 - facebook/react#27440 - facebook/react#27436
ztanner
added a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 16, 2023
…experimental prefix for server action APIs (#56809) The latest React canary builds have a few changes that need to be adopted for compatability. 1. the `useFormState` and `useFormStatus` hooks in `react-dom` and the `formData` opiont in `react-dom/server` are no longer prefixed with `experimental_` 2. server content (an undocumented React feature) has been removed. Next only had trivial intenral use of this API and did not expose a coherent feature to Next users (no ability to seed context on refetches). It is still possible that some users used the React server context APIs which is why this should go into Next 14. ### React upstream changes - facebook/react#27513 - facebook/react#27514 - facebook/react#27511 - facebook/react#27508 - facebook/react#27502 - facebook/react#27474 - facebook/react#26789 - facebook/react#27500 - facebook/react#27488 - facebook/react#27458 - facebook/react#27471 - facebook/react#27470 - facebook/react#27464 - facebook/react#27456 - facebook/react#27462 - facebook/react#27461 - facebook/react#27460 - facebook/react#27459 - facebook/react#27454 - facebook/react#27457 - facebook/react#27453 - facebook/react#27401 - facebook/react#27443 - facebook/react#27445 - facebook/react#27364 - facebook/react#27440 - facebook/react#27436 --------- Co-authored-by: Zack Tanner <zacktanner@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <inbox@huozhi.im>
EdisonVan
pushed a commit
to EdisonVan/react
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
…7456) The way we collect component stacks right now are pretty fragile. We expect that we'll call captureBoundaryErrorDetailsDev whenever an error happens. That resets lastBoundaryErrorComponentStackDev to null but if we don't, it just lingers and we don't set it to anything new then which leaks the previous component stack into the next time we have an error. So we need to reset it in a bunch of places. This is still broken with erroredReplay because it has the inverse problem that abortRemainingReplayNodes can call captureBoundaryErrorDetailsDev more than one time. So the second boundary won't get a stack. We probably should try to figure out an alternative way to carry along the stack. Perhaps WeakMap keyed by the error object. This also fixes an issue where we weren't invoking the onShellReady event if we error a replay. That event is a bit weird for resuming because we're probably really supposed to just invoke it immediately if we have already flushed the shell in the prerender which is always atm. Right now, it gets invoked later than necessary because you could have a resumed hole ready before a sibling in the shell is ready and that's blocked.
bigfootjon
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 18, 2024
The way we collect component stacks right now are pretty fragile. We expect that we'll call captureBoundaryErrorDetailsDev whenever an error happens. That resets lastBoundaryErrorComponentStackDev to null but if we don't, it just lingers and we don't set it to anything new then which leaks the previous component stack into the next time we have an error. So we need to reset it in a bunch of places. This is still broken with erroredReplay because it has the inverse problem that abortRemainingReplayNodes can call captureBoundaryErrorDetailsDev more than one time. So the second boundary won't get a stack. We probably should try to figure out an alternative way to carry along the stack. Perhaps WeakMap keyed by the error object. This also fixes an issue where we weren't invoking the onShellReady event if we error a replay. That event is a bit weird for resuming because we're probably really supposed to just invoke it immediately if we have already flushed the shell in the prerender which is always atm. Right now, it gets invoked later than necessary because you could have a resumed hole ready before a sibling in the shell is ready and that's blocked. DiffTrain build for commit 0fba3ec.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The way we collect component stacks right now are pretty fragile.
We expect that we'll call captureBoundaryErrorDetailsDev whenever an error happens. That resets lastBoundaryErrorComponentStackDev to null but if we don't, it just lingers and we don't set it to anything new then which leaks the previous component stack into the next time we have an error. So we need to reset it in a bunch of places.
This is still broken with erroredReplay because it has the inverse problem that abortRemainingReplayNodes can call captureBoundaryErrorDetailsDev more than one time. So the second boundary won't get a stack.
We probably should try to figure out an alternative way to carry along the stack. Perhaps WeakMap keyed by the error object.
This also fixes an issue where we weren't invoking the onShellReady event if we error a replay. That event is a bit weird for resuming because we're probably really supposed to just invoke it immediately if we have already flushed the shell in the prerender which is always atm. Right now, it gets invoked later than necessary because you could have a resumed hole ready before a sibling in the shell is ready and that's blocked.