-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Fizz] Fix children rendering in custom elements with enableCustomElementPropertySupport
#27511
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…g of custom elements in a way that is more useful that just treating every prop as an attribute. However when server rendering we have no choice but to serialize props as attributes. When this flag is on and React supports more prop types on the client like functions and objects the server implementation needs to be a bit more naunced in how it renders these components. With this flag on `false`, function, and object props are omitted entirely and `true` is normalized to `""`. There was a bug however in the implementation which caused children more complex than a single string to be omitted because it matched the object type filter. This change reorganizes the code a bit to put these filters in the default prop handline case, leaving children, style, and innerHTML to be handled via normal logic.
facebook-github-bot
added
CLA Signed
React Core Team
Opened by a member of the React Core Team
labels
Oct 12, 2023
gnoff
changed the title
The
[Fizz] Fix children rendering in custom elements with Oct 12, 2023
enableCustomElementPropertySupport
flag changes React's handlin…enableCustomElementPropertySupport
sebmarkbage
approved these changes
Oct 12, 2023
Comparing: ea8a861...78db6ca Critical size changesIncludes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:
Significant size changesIncludes any change greater than 0.2%: (No significant changes) |
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 12, 2023
…ementPropertySupport` (#27511) The `enableCustomElementPropertySupport` flag changes React's handling of custom elements in a way that is more useful that just treating every prop as an attribute. However when server rendering we have no choice but to serialize props as attributes. When this flag is on and React supports more prop types on the client like functions and objects the server implementation needs to be a bit more naunced in how it renders these components. With this flag on `false`, function, and object props are omitted entirely and `true` is normalized to `""`. There was a bug however in the implementation which caused children more complex than a single string to be omitted because it matched the object type filter. This change reorganizes the code a bit to put these filters in the default prop handline case, leaving children, style, and innerHTML to be handled via normal logic. fixes: #27286 DiffTrain build for [bb77852](bb77852)
gnoff
added a commit
to gnoff/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 13, 2023
- facebook/react#27514 - facebook/react#27511 - facebook/react#27508 - facebook/react#27502 - facebook/react#27474 - facebook/react#26789 - facebook/react#27500 - facebook/react#27488 - facebook/react#27458 - facebook/react#27471 - facebook/react#27470 - facebook/react#27464 - facebook/react#27456 - facebook/react#27462 - facebook/react#27461 - facebook/react#27460 - facebook/react#27459 - facebook/react#27454 - facebook/react#27457 - facebook/react#27453 - facebook/react#27401 - facebook/react#27443 - facebook/react#27445 - facebook/react#27364 - facebook/react#27440 - facebook/react#27436
gnoff
added a commit
to gnoff/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 13, 2023
- facebook/react#27513 - facebook/react#27514 - facebook/react#27511 - facebook/react#27508 - facebook/react#27502 - facebook/react#27474 - facebook/react#26789 - facebook/react#27500 - facebook/react#27488 - facebook/react#27458 - facebook/react#27471 - facebook/react#27470 - facebook/react#27464 - facebook/react#27456 - facebook/react#27462 - facebook/react#27461 - facebook/react#27460 - facebook/react#27459 - facebook/react#27454 - facebook/react#27457 - facebook/react#27453 - facebook/react#27401 - facebook/react#27443 - facebook/react#27445 - facebook/react#27364 - facebook/react#27440 - facebook/react#27436
gnoff
added a commit
to gnoff/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 13, 2023
- facebook/react#27513 - facebook/react#27514 - facebook/react#27511 - facebook/react#27508 - facebook/react#27502 - facebook/react#27474 - facebook/react#26789 - facebook/react#27500 - facebook/react#27488 - facebook/react#27458 - facebook/react#27471 - facebook/react#27470 - facebook/react#27464 - facebook/react#27456 - facebook/react#27462 - facebook/react#27461 - facebook/react#27460 - facebook/react#27459 - facebook/react#27454 - facebook/react#27457 - facebook/react#27453 - facebook/react#27401 - facebook/react#27443 - facebook/react#27445 - facebook/react#27364 - facebook/react#27440 - facebook/react#27436
gnoff
added a commit
to gnoff/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 13, 2023
- facebook/react#27513 - facebook/react#27514 - facebook/react#27511 - facebook/react#27508 - facebook/react#27502 - facebook/react#27474 - facebook/react#26789 - facebook/react#27500 - facebook/react#27488 - facebook/react#27458 - facebook/react#27471 - facebook/react#27470 - facebook/react#27464 - facebook/react#27456 - facebook/react#27462 - facebook/react#27461 - facebook/react#27460 - facebook/react#27459 - facebook/react#27454 - facebook/react#27457 - facebook/react#27453 - facebook/react#27401 - facebook/react#27443 - facebook/react#27445 - facebook/react#27364 - facebook/react#27440 - facebook/react#27436
gnoff
added a commit
to gnoff/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 16, 2023
- facebook/react#27513 - facebook/react#27514 - facebook/react#27511 - facebook/react#27508 - facebook/react#27502 - facebook/react#27474 - facebook/react#26789 - facebook/react#27500 - facebook/react#27488 - facebook/react#27458 - facebook/react#27471 - facebook/react#27470 - facebook/react#27464 - facebook/react#27456 - facebook/react#27462 - facebook/react#27461 - facebook/react#27460 - facebook/react#27459 - facebook/react#27454 - facebook/react#27457 - facebook/react#27453 - facebook/react#27401 - facebook/react#27443 - facebook/react#27445 - facebook/react#27364 - facebook/react#27440 - facebook/react#27436
ztanner
added a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 16, 2023
…experimental prefix for server action APIs (#56809) The latest React canary builds have a few changes that need to be adopted for compatability. 1. the `useFormState` and `useFormStatus` hooks in `react-dom` and the `formData` opiont in `react-dom/server` are no longer prefixed with `experimental_` 2. server content (an undocumented React feature) has been removed. Next only had trivial intenral use of this API and did not expose a coherent feature to Next users (no ability to seed context on refetches). It is still possible that some users used the React server context APIs which is why this should go into Next 14. ### React upstream changes - facebook/react#27513 - facebook/react#27514 - facebook/react#27511 - facebook/react#27508 - facebook/react#27502 - facebook/react#27474 - facebook/react#26789 - facebook/react#27500 - facebook/react#27488 - facebook/react#27458 - facebook/react#27471 - facebook/react#27470 - facebook/react#27464 - facebook/react#27456 - facebook/react#27462 - facebook/react#27461 - facebook/react#27460 - facebook/react#27459 - facebook/react#27454 - facebook/react#27457 - facebook/react#27453 - facebook/react#27401 - facebook/react#27443 - facebook/react#27445 - facebook/react#27364 - facebook/react#27440 - facebook/react#27436 --------- Co-authored-by: Zack Tanner <zacktanner@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <inbox@huozhi.im>
1 task
EdisonVan
pushed a commit
to EdisonVan/react
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
…ementPropertySupport` (facebook#27511) The `enableCustomElementPropertySupport` flag changes React's handling of custom elements in a way that is more useful that just treating every prop as an attribute. However when server rendering we have no choice but to serialize props as attributes. When this flag is on and React supports more prop types on the client like functions and objects the server implementation needs to be a bit more naunced in how it renders these components. With this flag on `false`, function, and object props are omitted entirely and `true` is normalized to `""`. There was a bug however in the implementation which caused children more complex than a single string to be omitted because it matched the object type filter. This change reorganizes the code a bit to put these filters in the default prop handline case, leaving children, style, and innerHTML to be handled via normal logic. fixes: facebook#27286
bigfootjon
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 18, 2024
…ementPropertySupport` (#27511) The `enableCustomElementPropertySupport` flag changes React's handling of custom elements in a way that is more useful that just treating every prop as an attribute. However when server rendering we have no choice but to serialize props as attributes. When this flag is on and React supports more prop types on the client like functions and objects the server implementation needs to be a bit more naunced in how it renders these components. With this flag on `false`, function, and object props are omitted entirely and `true` is normalized to `""`. There was a bug however in the implementation which caused children more complex than a single string to be omitted because it matched the object type filter. This change reorganizes the code a bit to put these filters in the default prop handline case, leaving children, style, and innerHTML to be handled via normal logic. fixes: #27286 DiffTrain build for commit bb77852.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
enableCustomElementPropertySupport
flag changes React's handling of custom elements in a way that is more useful that just treating every prop as an attribute. However when server rendering we have no choice but to serialize props as attributes. When this flag is on and React supports more prop types on the client like functions and objects the server implementation needs to be a bit more naunced in how it renders these components. With this flag onfalse
, function, and object props are omitted entirely andtrue
is normalized to""
. There was a bug however in the implementation which caused children more complex than a single string to be omitted because it matched the object type filter. This change reorganizes the code a bit to put these filters in the default prop handline case, leaving children, style, and innerHTML to be handled via normal logic.fixes: #27286