Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ROS 2 imu node #212

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 23, 2023
Merged

ROS 2 imu node #212

merged 6 commits into from
Nov 23, 2023

Conversation

KmakD
Copy link
Contributor

@KmakD KmakD commented Nov 23, 2023

No description provided.

@KmakD KmakD requested a review from pkowalsk1 November 23, 2023 10:25
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
imu_filter_node:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

imu_config.yaml or imu.yaml? Considering other config in this pkg and other Husarion robots utilize ekf.yaml, etc., which one would you prefer?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good question. in ROS 1 all configs are named with _config. I assume we switch to not using it.


imu_container = ComposableNodeContainer(
name="imu_container",
namespace="",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it necessary? Won't they conflict if we add a namespace in bringup.launch later?

@KmakD KmakD requested a review from pkowalsk1 November 23, 2023 15:02
@pkowalsk1 pkowalsk1 merged commit 34c9947 into ros2-devel Nov 23, 2023
@pkowalsk1 pkowalsk1 deleted the ros2-imu-node branch November 23, 2023 15:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants