Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

jobs: use node-e2e-project boskos pool for (ci) node-e2e jobs #17349

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2020
Merged

jobs: use node-e2e-project boskos pool for (ci) node-e2e jobs #17349

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2020

Conversation

spiffxp
Copy link
Member

@spiffxp spiffxp commented Apr 23, 2020

pool isn't large enough to handle presubmit load

followup to #17284

completes followup described in: kubernetes/kubernetes#89892 (comment)

@spiffxp
jobs: use node-e2e-project boskos pool for (ci) node-e2e jobs
a74a1e9 
pool isn't large enough to handle presubmit load
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Apr 23, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/config Issues or PRs related to code in /config area/release-eng Issues or PRs related to the Release Engineering subproject sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. labels Apr 23, 2020
@spiffxp spiffxp mentioned this pull request Apr 23, 2020
Closed
@spiffxp
Copy link
Member Author

spiffxp commented Apr 23, 2020

/uncc @cpanato @yujuhong
/cc @dims @derekwaynecarr

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from derekwaynecarr and dims and removed request for cpanato and yujuhong April 23, 2020 01:28
This was referenced Apr 23, 2020
Merged
Closed
hasheddan
hasheddan approved these changes Apr 23, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@hasheddan hasheddan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Thanks for following up on this @spiffxp!

@kubernetes/ci-signal

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 23, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hasheddan, spiffxp

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 23cd552 into kubernetes:master Apr 23, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.19 milestone Apr 23, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@spiffxp: Updated the job-config configmap in namespace default at cluster default using the following files:

  • key node-kubelet.yaml using file config/jobs/kubernetes/sig-node/node-kubelet.yaml
  • key 1.15.yaml using file config/jobs/kubernetes/sig-release/release-branch-jobs/1.15.yaml
  • key 1.16.yaml using file config/jobs/kubernetes/sig-release/release-branch-jobs/1.16.yaml
  • key 1.17.yaml using file config/jobs/kubernetes/sig-release/release-branch-jobs/1.17.yaml
  • key 1.18.yaml using file config/jobs/kubernetes/sig-release/release-branch-jobs/1.18.yaml

In response to this:

pool isn't large enough to handle presubmit load

followup to #17284

completes followup described in: kubernetes/kubernetes#89892 (comment)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@hasheddan hasheddan mentioned this pull request Apr 23, 2020
Closed
@spiffxp spiffxp deleted the use-node-e2e-pool branch April 23, 2020 15:34
@spiffxp spiffxp mentioned this pull request Apr 23, 2020
Merged
@hasheddan hasheddan mentioned this pull request Apr 30, 2020
Merged
@MHBauer MHBauer mentioned this pull request Jun 4, 2020
Open
@dims dims mentioned this pull request Jul 21, 2020
Merged
@spiffxp spiffxp mentioned this pull request Jun 17, 2021
Open
55 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@hasheddan hasheddan hasheddan approved these changes

@derekwaynecarr derekwaynecarr Awaiting requested review from derekwaynecarr

@dims dims Awaiting requested review from dims

Assignees

@hasheddan hasheddan

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/config Issues or PRs related to code in /config area/release-eng Issues or PRs related to the Release Engineering subproject cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v1.19
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@spiffxp @k8s-ci-robot @hasheddan