Bug 2096780: Wizard Sysprep modal with existing sysprep selection

[upalatucci]

📝 Description

Sysprep modal with sysprep selection.

Follow-up pr will enable sysprep selection in template scripts tab

🎥 Demo

[openshift-ci]

@upalatucci: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2096780, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 2096780: Sysprep modal with existing sysprep selection

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[upalatucci]

/bugzilla refresh

[openshift-ci]

@upalatucci: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2096780, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target release (4.12.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.12.0)
• bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @gouyang

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[yaacov]

/lgtm

text may be nicer "sysprep" -> "sysprep configMap" or "sysprep configuration" ?

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: upalatucci, yaacov

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [yaacov]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[upalatucci]

Yes, agree. I would go for "sysprep configuration"

[openshift-ci]

@upalatucci: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

• kubevirt-ui/kubevirt-plugin#676
• kubevirt-ui/kubevirt-plugin#682

Bugzilla bug 2096780 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 2096780: Wizard Sysprep modal with existing sysprep selection

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.