Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(core): Migration for soft deletions for executions #7088

Merged

Conversation

ivov
Copy link
Contributor

@ivov ivov commented Sep 4, 2023

@ivov ivov requested a review from a team as a code owner September 4, 2023 09:42
@ivov ivov marked this pull request as draft September 4, 2023 09:42
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 4, 2023

Great PR! Please pay attention to the following items before merging:

Files matching packages/**:

  • If fixing bug, added test to cover scenario.
  • If addressing forum or Github issue, added link to description.

Files matching packages/**/*.ts:

  • Added unit tests to cover new or updated functionality.

Files matching packages/cli/src/databases/migrations/**:

  • Requested review from at least two engineers on migration.
  • Avoided irreversible data migrations.
  • Avoided deleting or updating data keys.
  • Wrote 'down' migration if possible.

Make sure to check off this list before asking for review.

@n8n-assistant n8n-assistant bot added core Enhancement outside /nodes-base and /editor-ui n8n team Authored by the n8n team labels Sep 4, 2023
*/
export class ExecutionSoftDelete1693491613982 implements ReversibleMigration {
async up({ schemaBuilder: { addColumns, column, createIndex } }: MigrationContext) {
await addColumns('execution_entity', [column('deletedAt').timestamp()]);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was adding createdAt here because we are currently using startedAt incorrectly as createdAt in queue mode, and I wanted to avoid creating 2 separate migrations.
But now that the execution data is in a separate table, perhaps another migration isn't actually going to be that bad. if that's the case, we should also remove the field from the entity.

@ivov ivov marked this pull request as ready for review September 4, 2023 10:16
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 4, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: -0.01% ⚠️

Comparison is base (442b910) 32.11% compared to head (78015f8) 32.11%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7088      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   32.11%   32.11%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        3188     3188              
  Lines      195897   195898       +1     
  Branches    21357    21361       +4     
==========================================
- Hits        62906    62903       -3     
- Misses     131959   131962       +3     
- Partials     1032     1033       +1     
Files Changed Coverage Δ
...ages/cli/src/databases/entities/ExecutionEntity.ts 65.00% <0.00%> (-3.43%) ⬇️

... and 5 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 4, 2023

⚠️ Some Cypress E2E specs are failing, please fix them before merging

@cypress
Copy link

cypress bot commented Sep 4, 2023

1 flaky test on run #2073 ↗︎

0 238 0 0 Flakiness 1

Details:

🌳 pay-770-migration-introducing-soft-deletes-for-executions 🖥️ browsers:node18...
Project: n8n Commit: 78015f817f
Status: Passed Duration: 10:30 💡
Started: Sep 4, 2023 11:03 AM Ended: Sep 4, 2023 12:13 PM
Flakiness  cypress/e2e/24-ndv-paired-item.cy.ts • 1 flaky test

View Output Video

Test Artifacts
NDV > resolves expression with default item when input node is not parent, while still pairing items Output Screenshots Video

This comment has been generated by cypress-bot as a result of this project's GitHub integration settings.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 4, 2023

✅ All Cypress E2E specs passed

@ivov ivov merged commit 413e0bc into master Sep 4, 2023
19 checks passed
@ivov ivov deleted the pay-770-migration-introducing-soft-deletes-for-executions branch September 4, 2023 12:34
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Sep 6, 2023
netroy added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2023
# [1.6.0](https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/compare/n8n@1.5.1...n8n@1.6.0)
(2023-09-06)


### Bug Fixes

* **core:** Add support for in-transit encryption (TLS) on Redis
connections ([#7047](#7047))
([a910757](a910757))
* **core:** Disallow orphan executions
([#7069](#7069))
([8a28e98](8a28e98))
* **core:** Split event bus controller into community and ee
([#7107](#7107))
([011ee2e](011ee2e))
* **editor:** Standardize save text
([#7093](#7093))
([58b3492](58b3492))
* Ensure all new executions are saved
([#7061](#7061))
([b8e06d2](b8e06d2))
* Load remote resources even if expressions in non requried parameters
resolve ([#6987](#6987))
([8a8d4e8](8a8d4e8))
* **Postgres Node:** Connection pool of the database object has been
destroyed ([#7074](#7074))
([9dd5f0e](9dd5f0e))
* **Postgres Node:** Tunnel doesn't always close
([#7087](#7087))
([58e55ba](58e55ba))


### Features

* **core:** Add list query middleware to credentials
([#7041](#7041))
([fd78021](fd78021))
* **core:** Add support for floating licenses
([#7090](#7090))
([e26553f](e26553f))
* **core:** Migration for soft deletions for executions
([#7088](#7088))
([413e0bc](413e0bc))
* **HTTP Request Node:** Determine binary file name from
content-disposition headers
([#7032](#7032))
([273d091](273d091))
* **TheHive Node:** Overhaul
([#6457](#6457))
([73e782e](73e782e))

Co-authored-by: netroy <netroy@users.noreply.github.com>
@janober
Copy link
Member

janober commented Sep 6, 2023

Got released with n8n@1.6.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core Enhancement outside /nodes-base and /editor-ui n8n team Authored by the n8n team Released
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants