Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

wasmtime: remove lightbeam support code #11529

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 13, 2024
Merged

Conversation

nagisa
Copy link
Collaborator

@nagisa nagisa commented Jun 10, 2024

Lightbeam backend has been removed from wasmtime all the way back in 2021. The supporting code we have here won't build, and we don't test it either.

bytecodealliance/wasmtime#3390

Lightbeam backend has been removed from wasmtime all the way back in 2021.
The supporting code we have here won't build, and we don't test it
either.
@nagisa nagisa requested a review from a team as a code owner June 10, 2024 11:47
@nagisa nagisa requested a review from saketh-are June 10, 2024 11:47
@nagisa nagisa enabled auto-merge June 10, 2024 11:47
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 71.36%. Comparing base (fe5a71c) to head (89afa08).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #11529      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   71.37%   71.36%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         790      790              
  Lines      160086   160086              
  Branches   160086   160086              
==========================================
- Hits       114256   114243      -13     
- Misses      40857    40867      +10     
- Partials     4973     4976       +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
backward-compatibility 0.23% <ø> (ø)
db-migration 0.23% <ø> (ø)
genesis-check 1.35% <ø> (ø)
integration-tests 37.65% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
linux 68.80% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
linux-nightly 70.90% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
macos 52.42% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
pytests 1.57% <ø> (ø)
sanity-checks 1.37% <ø> (ø)
unittests 66.05% <ø> (-0.03%) ⬇️
upgradability 0.28% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@nagisa nagisa added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 13, 2024
Merged via the queue into near:master with commit 26a97fc Jun 13, 2024
28 of 29 checks passed
@nagisa nagisa deleted the nukes-lightbeam branch June 13, 2024 14:29
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2024
This largely mirrors the code in near_vm_runner module. I heard some
people pondering what it would be like to use a higher quality backend.
Outside LLVM, Cranelift is by far the next in line in produced code
quality. Since we already have wasmtime in place, might as well wire it
up completely for a full experience.

Based on top of #11529
Part of #11319
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants