Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NETOBSERV-1113 implements RTT option in Console Plugin #365

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Sep 5, 2023

Conversation

jpinsonneau
Copy link
Contributor

@jpinsonneau jpinsonneau commented Aug 1, 2023

This PR will need #361 to manage FilterComponent.Number with more than capability.

image
image
image
image

  • Add flow RTT field and filter
  • Add graphs (average)
    • Pie chart
    • Line chart
  • display RTT in topology

Max / P90 / P99 followup:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NETOBSERV-1227

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 1, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 50.40% and project coverage change: -0.86% ⚠️

Comparison is base (d0d7fc5) 57.67% compared to head (c20860f) 56.82%.
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #365      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   57.67%   56.82%   -0.86%     
==========================================
  Files         166      167       +1     
  Lines        7712     7865     +153     
  Branches      935      955      +20     
==========================================
+ Hits         4448     4469      +21     
- Misses       2993     3115     +122     
- Partials      271      281      +10     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 57.65% <53.53%> (-0.34%) ⬇️
unittests 54.51% <38.46%> (-2.26%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Changed Coverage Δ
pkg/loki/flow_query.go 66.10% <0.00%> (-1.73%) ⬇️
pkg/model/fields/fields.go 100.00% <ø> (ø)
web/src/api/ipfix.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
web/src/components/__tests-data__/metrics.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...components/dropdowns/topology-display-dropdown.tsx 47.36% <ø> (ø)
web/src/components/filters/filters-toolbar.tsx 64.17% <ø> (ø)
...onents/netflow-overview/netflow-overview-panel.tsx 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...ponents/netflow-topology/__tests-data__/metrics.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
web/src/model/config.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
web/src/model/filters.ts 72.30% <ø> (ø)
... and 21 more

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@@ -22,9 +22,13 @@ quickFilters:
- name: Services network
filter:
dst_kind: 'Service'
- name: DNS
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm how does that work if the feature is off? Is it ignored?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

intVal, _ := strconv.Atoi(value)
for i := 1; i < len(value); i++ {
nextMin := int((intVal / int(math.Pow10(i))) + 1)
nextMinStr := fmt.Sprintf("%d", nextMin)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here and below: not a big deal as this wouldn't be frequently called, but strconv.Itoa or strconv.FormatInt are more efficient to convert ints to strings.

(PS: I've seen this commit is from the DNS PR, but since it's already lgtm you might want to change it here instead)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

case "flowRtt":
f = "avg_over_time"
t = "TimeFlowRttNs"
factor = 0.000001 // nanoseconds to miliseconds
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

to avoid any floating point precision issue, it could be better to divide by an int rather than multiply by a decimal
Also, as long as it's only used to inject in a query (as string), that could be written right away as a string (if I'm correct we don't use the numerical value for anything) - that would also avoid that strings.Replace done below to get the right format for loki :-)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sure, a string would be better as it would keep both operator and value at once 👍

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jpinsonneau
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased without extra changes

@jpinsonneau jpinsonneau added the ok-to-test To set manually when a PR is safe to test. Triggers image build on PR. label Aug 3, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 3, 2023

New image:
quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-console-plugin:bb3b18a

It will expire after two weeks.

To deploy this build, run from the operator repo, assuming the operator is running:

USER=netobserv VERSION=bb3b18a make set-plugin-image

@jpinsonneau jpinsonneau requested a review from jotak August 17, 2023 10:47
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the ok-to-test To set manually when a PR is safe to test. Triggers image build on PR. label Aug 17, 2023
@jotak jotak added the ok-to-test To set manually when a PR is safe to test. Triggers image build on PR. label Aug 24, 2023
Copy link
Member

@jotak jotak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code LGTM, will do some tests before approving

@github-actions
Copy link

New image:
quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-console-plugin:f6bf6ab

It will expire after two weeks.

To deploy this build, run from the operator repo, assuming the operator is running:

USER=netobserv VERSION=f6bf6ab make set-plugin-image

@jotak
Copy link
Member

jotak commented Aug 24, 2023

@jpinsonneau I get an error when I'm trying it:
image

This is due to a new input validation check that I added recently: https://github.com/netobserv/network-observability-console-plugin/blob/main/pkg/handler/validation.go#L92-L108
It needs to be updated with the new introduced metric type

@jpinsonneau
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jpinsonneau I get an error when I'm trying it: image

This is due to a new input validation check that I added recently: https://github.com/netobserv/network-observability-console-plugin/blob/main/pkg/handler/validation.go#L92-L108 It needs to be updated with the new introduced metric type

Fixed and rebased. Thanks for the check 👍

@jotak jotak added the ok-to-test To set manually when a PR is safe to test. Triggers image build on PR. label Aug 24, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

New image:
quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-console-plugin:5364808

It will expire after two weeks.

To deploy this build, run from the operator repo, assuming the operator is running:

USER=netobserv VERSION=5364808 make set-plugin-image

@jotak
Copy link
Member

jotak commented Aug 24, 2023

Thanks Julien
re-tested, I have some few feedback:

  • In Overview, Donut: it shows "Ms", which would stand for "Megasecond" ... should be a low-case "ms"
  • Overview, Timeseries chart: Y axis should show the unit (ms)
  • Overview, Timeseries chart: it seems there's no tooltip?
  • Topology, Edge labels: it's also showing Ms instead of ms

On a more general note, I started testing with the default sampling, and this is really impractical as very few RTTs come up. After switching to sampling 1, it started to look good. I guess that's going to be a known issue, at least for some time, but we should probably document that (not only in the downstream doc, but also in the CRD doc). We can create a new task for that in the 1.5 epic.
Also, maybe also in the 1.5 epic, we could add a task to show things like p99 latencies rather than averages, which I think is more relevant to look at for SRE

PS: the issues with the timeseries chart are not blockers I think, if you prefer to keep that for the 1.5 epic; but the Ms/ms should be an easy win, right?

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the ok-to-test To set manually when a PR is safe to test. Triggers image build on PR. label Aug 24, 2023
@jpinsonneau
Copy link
Contributor Author

the issues with the timeseries chart are not blockers I think, if you prefer to keep that for the 1.5 epic; but the Ms/ms should be an easy win, right?

Sure let's do this: d321f52

We already have the MAX / P90 / P99 issue under the overview enhancement epic:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NETOBSERV-1227

We can put other items under the followup epic:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NETOBSERV-1225

@jpinsonneau
Copy link
Contributor Author

We should mention in the UI that these metrics are TCP only. I suggest to add this in each graph title and tooltips.
Would that work for you guys @dushyantbehl & @msherif1234 ?

@jotak
Copy link
Member

jotak commented Aug 29, 2023

We should mention in the UI that these metrics are TCP only. I suggest to add this in each graph title and tooltips. Would that work for you guys @dushyantbehl & @msherif1234 ?

+1, even say "TCP handshakes" as this is limited to that

@jotak jotak added the ok-to-test To set manually when a PR is safe to test. Triggers image build on PR. label Aug 29, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

New image:
quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-console-plugin:f37677f

It will expire after two weeks.

To deploy this build, run from the operator repo, assuming the operator is running:

USER=netobserv VERSION=f37677f make set-plugin-image

Copy link
Member

@jotak jotak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM
Some feedback added to the next epic
@jpinsonneau feel free to implement your suggestion about the chart tooltips mentioning TCP

@jotak jotak self-requested a review August 29, 2023 09:37
@jotak
Copy link
Member

jotak commented Sep 5, 2023

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 5, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jotak

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved label Sep 5, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 967e4c8 into netobserv:main Sep 5, 2023
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm ok-to-test To set manually when a PR is safe to test. Triggers image build on PR.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants