Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IVC: verify that the current design supports the MIPS interpreter #2368

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dannywillems
Copy link
Member

@dannywillems dannywillems commented Jun 20, 2024

This will help later verifying the IVC circuit can still be built.
It is mostly checking that the changes in the previous PR does not change the fact that the current design supports our first real use case, which is the MIPS interpreter (consisting of less than 100 columns).

@dannywillems dannywillems changed the title Dw/ivc improve testing with different nb app cols IVC: verify that the current design supports the MIPS interpreter Jun 20, 2024
@dannywillems dannywillems force-pushed the dw/add-doc-block-height-columns branch from 17f4d5d to 7dccc57 Compare June 20, 2024 15:41
@dannywillems dannywillems force-pushed the dw/ivc-improve-testing-with-different-nb-app-cols branch 2 times, most recently from 8a5ad52 to a0f2209 Compare June 20, 2024 16:12
@dannywillems dannywillems force-pushed the dw/ivc-improve-testing-with-different-nb-app-cols branch from a0f2209 to d4cc506 Compare June 20, 2024 17:20
@dannywillems
Copy link
Member Author

dannywillems commented Jun 20, 2024

Getting:

      SIGKILL [ 293.150s] ivc ivc::tests::test_completeness_ivc_app_100_cols
     SIGTERM [ 293.107s] ivc ivc::tests::test_completeness_ivc_app_233_cols
     SIGTERM [ 293.178s] ivc ivc::tests::test_completeness_ivc_app_50_cols
     SIGTERM [ 280.196s] ivc poseidon_55_0_7_3_2::tests::test_completeness

Weird.

Base automatically changed from dw/add-doc-block-height-columns to master June 24, 2024 12:43
@dannywillems dannywillems marked this pull request as draft June 24, 2024 12:45
@dannywillems
Copy link
Member Author

Using the changes from #2373 should fix the CI.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant