-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
Improved election pallet testing #12327
Improved election pallet testing #12327
Conversation
@kianenigma PTAL. |
Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks mostly good, some small changes needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would like to see events in other tests as well, namely at least one that finished with compute: Signed
(signed.rs
)
@@ -1879,7 +1879,7 @@ mod tests { | |||
assert!(MultiPhase::snapshot().is_some()); | |||
assert_eq!(MultiPhase::round(), 1); | |||
|
|||
roll_to(25); | |||
roll_to_unsigned(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Referring to line 1877.
I think if we are using this pattern then we should not use the exact block numbers explicitly in the code anymore.
What I mean is, the test should read something like this
roll_to_signed();
some_assertions();
roll_by(9); // instead of roll_to(24), go forward by 9 blocks
assertions_phase_still_signed();
roll_to_unsigned();
some_assertions();
My reasoning for this is, if we still have to keep track of block numbers, it defeats the purpose of using the pattern roll_to_event()
Since we are actively moving forward till a certain phase is reached, we probably don't need this assertions at block 24 anyway. If there is a logical assertion needed here, may be it could be done a bit differently. For example, block_unsigned_phase - block_signed_phase == 10
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cc @kianenigma
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The goal is to have as much "separation of concerns" as possible. There is one tests somewhere in there that checks roll_to(x)
manually (called phase_rotation_works
). All other tests should spend the minimum amount of mental effort to deal with phase related stuff, so I would stick to roll_to_signed
and roll_to_unsigned
for the sake of simplicity.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am agreeing with the pattern. I agree we can keep manual roll over for this test. There are still few more roll_to()
checks that I think we can get rid of.
/tip medium |
@kianenigma A medium tip was successfully submitted for Szegoo (126X27SbhrV19mBFawys3ovkyBS87SGfYwtwa8J2FjHrtbmA on polkadot). https://polkadot.js.org/apps/?rpc=wss%3A%2F%2Frpc.polkadot.io#/treasury/tips |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! Nice work. :)
bot rebase |
Rebased |
bot merge |
* master: (42 commits) Adapt `pallet-contracts` to WeightV2 (#12421) Improved election pallet testing (#12327) Bump prost to 0.11+ (#12419) Use saturating add for alliance::disband witness data (#12418) [Fix] Rename VoterBagsList -> VoterList to match pdot (#12416) client/beefy: small code improvements (#12414) BEEFY: Simplify hashing for pallet-beefy-mmr (#12393) Add @koute to `docs/CODEOWNERS` and update stale paths (#12408) docs/CODEOWNERS: add @acatangiu as MMR owner (#12406) Remove unnecessary Clone trait bounds on CountedStorageMap (#12402) Fix `Weight::is_zero` (#12396) Beefy on-demand justifications as a custom RequestResponse protocol (#12124) Remove contracts RPCs (#12358) pallet-mmr: generate historical proofs (#12324) unsafe_pruning flag removed (#12385) Carry over where clauses defined in Config to Call and Hook (#12388) Properly set the max proof size weight on defaults and tests (#12383) BEEFY: impl TypeInfo for SignedCommitment (#12382) bounding staking: `BoundedElectionProvider` trait (#12362) New Pallet: Root offences (#11943) ...
* Improved election pallet testing * fmt * remove comment * more checks * fixes in logic * roll_to_signed * switch to roll_to_signed * Update frame/election-provider-multi-phase/src/mock.rs Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com> * remove useless checks * remove warning * add checks to signed.rs * add some checks to unsigned.rs * fmt * use roll_to_signed and roll_to_unsigned * remove nonsense * remove even more nonsense * fix * fix * remove useless checks Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: parity-processbot <>
Closes: #12184
roll_to(25)
withroll_to_unsigned
roll_to(15)
withroll_to_signed
NOTE: I did go through the event assertions to see if the emitted events are correct and it seems like they are to me.
Polkadot address: 126X27SbhrV19mBFawys3ovkyBS87SGfYwtwa8J2FjHrtbmA