chore: make bazel running without nogo

[ei-sugimoto]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #50400

Problem Summary:

What changed and how does it work?

The developer can choose whether or not to run nogo when doing make bazel.
The initial value of nogo_FLAG is true.

$ time make NOGO_FLAG=true
CGO_ENABLED=1  GO111MODULE=on go build -tags codes  -ldflags '-X "github.com/pingcap/tidb/pkg/parser/mysql.TiDBReleaseVersion=v8.2.0-alpha-406-g255c08f58c" -X "github.com/pingcap/tidb/pkg/util/versioninfo.TiDBBuildTS=2024-06-23 12:34:35" -X "github.com/pingcap/tidb/pkg/util/versioninfo.TiDBGitHash=255c08f58cd611da3c204a2054fd2dab5e9c34f1" -X "github.com/pingcap/tidb/pkg/util/versioninfo.TiDBGitBranch=feat/make-bazel-running-without-nogo" -X "github.com/pingcap/tidb/pkg/util/versioninfo.TiDBEdition=Community" ' -o bin/tidb-server ./cmd/tidb-server
Build TiDB Server successfully!

real    0m16.067s
user    0m19.027s
sys     0m2.475s
$ time make NOGO_FLAG=false
CGO_ENABLED=1  GO111MODULE=on go build -tags codes  -ldflags '-X "github.com/pingcap/tidb/pkg/parser/mysql.TiDBReleaseVersion=v8.2.0-alpha-406-g255c08f58c" -X "github.com/pingcap/tidb/pkg/util/versioninfo.TiDBBuildTS=2024-06-23 12:35:28" -X "github.com/pingcap/tidb/pkg/util/versioninfo.TiDBGitHash=255c08f58cd611da3c204a2054fd2dab5e9c34f1" -X "github.com/pingcap/tidb/pkg/util/versioninfo.TiDBGitBranch=feat/make-bazel-running-without-nogo" -X "github.com/pingcap/tidb/pkg/util/versioninfo.TiDBEdition=Community" ' -o bin/tidb-server ./cmd/tidb-server
Build TiDB Server successfully!

real    0m13.757s
user    0m16.300s
sys     0m1.957s

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No need to test

  • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

[ti-chi-bot]

Hi @ei-sugimoto. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a pingcap member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[tiprow]

Hi @ei-sugimoto. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[hawkingrei]

/ok-to-test

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 55.5356%. Comparing base (74accb3) to head (61cf217).
Report is 20 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #54170         +/-   ##
=================================================
- Coverage   72.9483%   55.5356%   -17.4128%     
=================================================
  Files          1520       1643        +123     
  Lines        434902     611647     +176745     
=================================================
+ Hits         317254     339682      +22428     
- Misses        98179     248641     +150462     
- Partials      19469      23324       +3855     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	22.4987% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
dumpling	52.9656% <ø> (ø)
parser	∅ <ø> (∅)
br	52.4999% <ø> (+6.3307%)	⬆️

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hawkingrei, lance6716

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [hawkingrei,lance6716]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2024-06-23 15:03:46.485040943 +0000 UTC m=+559152.970529774: ☑️ agreed by hawkingrei.
• 2024-06-25 06:52:57.494603347 +0000 UTC m=+702503.980092180: ☑️ agreed by lance6716.