-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release 19.3! #6993
Comments
Our release month would be October. But I'm always up for figuring out our release manager early. 🙃 @xavfernandez had expressed interest in being the RM this month. As usual, I'm up for doing this if no one else is willing to pick this up. :) |
@pradyunsg please ping me when you start preparing a release. I'll do quickly a |
Knock knock @pypa/pip-committers -- who wants to be the RM? I'm gonna assume it's me if no one responds expressing interest by next week, Friday. :) |
@pradyunsg I'm still interested :) . If there is nothing important to wait (like #7102) I'll aim for a release during week 41. |
Looking at the rollout planned above, I think so? I mean, we'd want to support exactly (or a subset of tags of) what PyPI accepts. As long as the PR does that and there's no mismatch, I'm cool to merge it, since AFAICT, the changes are decent there. @xavfernandez could you please flag on the manylinux2014 rollout issue that the changes needed are not reflected in the TODO list for rollout? |
Alrightly, we have our release manager for pip 19.3: @xavfernandez. :) |
There's a thing to be removed for pip 19.3 -- |
#7163 took care of that. Is there any other pull request / issue we would like to include in 19.3 ? |
And I'll need to be added as maintainer in PyPI.org 😛 |
#7072 is good to go, IMO. @xavfernandez, I'll leave it up to you whether we merge, since it would require regenerating AUTHORS.txt (+another hour waiting for CI). |
I'll include it then :) I'll wait for monday morning to actually release 19.3 since I'll have very few available time tomorrow to deal with the potential aftermath of the release. |
@xavfernandez Sure! I'll be online on Monday and Tuesday too, for sprints, so I will be hands-on-deck all day at that time. |
I still don't have the right to upload to PyPI. Who could add me to PyPI ? @pfmoore or @dstufft ? |
Sounds like a plan to me. I can add you on PyPI. Lemme know whatever you prefer. |
I've added you on PyPI |
@xavfernandez what's your PyPI username? xavfer is already added and has the same profile picture as you. |
That makes sense @pfmoore! |
@xavfernandez I'm at PyCon India Sprints. Lemme know when it's okay to start merging PRs filed by folks here. :) |
Thanks @pfmoore :)
Feel free to merge the small ones: I'd first like #7198 to be merged before performing the release with it (if you could review #7198 by the way ;) ). |
19.3 has been released:
I'm currently waiting for |
Thanks for the smooth release, folks! Excellent work! 🎉 🎉 🎉 |
I merged my I'll keep this issue open for the week in case there are unexpected fallouts. |
Just noting #5599 is an issue effecting a lot of projects. Maybe that issue should be pinned? |
Pinning #5599 sounds like a reasonable suggestion - but I don't know how to do that. Edit: Never mind, I found it. |
@xavfernandez FYI, I think we should probably do a bugfix release:
|
#7232 is on its way. |
If #7232 brings no comment, I'll merge it and push the 19.3.1 tag, sdist & wheel tomorrow morning (UTC+2). |
Hurrah! Thanks @xavfernandez! |
19.3.1 has been released and |
i tried to upgrade pip but it says its a new version but when i check version it shows v10 pplz help |
@SASIN83 Please file a new issue: https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/new/choose |
@xavfernandez hi hi, is there anything that needs to be done? Are there bugs that were introduced that we'd want to fix in a bugfix release? |
None that I'm aware. |
Hurray! Thanks @xavfernandez for managing this release super smoothly. :) Thanks to everyone else who's helped out either with direct code/docs/triage help or by participating in the discussions! :) |
A new release!
This would enable use of #6770 and other new improvements.
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: