Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set the host library path in run-make v2 #123763

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 12, 2024

Conversation

cuviper
Copy link
Member

@cuviper cuviper commented Apr 11, 2024

When the build is configured with [rust] rpath = false, we need to set
LD_LIBRARY_PATH (or equivalent) to what would have been the RPATH,
so the compiler can find its own libraries. The old tools.mk code has
this environment prefixed in the $(BARE_RUSTC) variable, so we just
need to wire up something similar for run-make v2.

This is now set while building each rmake.rs itself, as well as in the
rust-make-support helpers for rustc and rustdoc commands. This is
also available in a set_host_rpath function for manual commands, like
in the compiler-builtins test.

When the build is configured with `[rust] rpath = false`, we need to set
`LD_LIBRARY_PATH` (or equivalent) to what would have been the `RPATH`,
so the compiler can find its own libraries. The old `tools.mk` code has
this environment prefixed in the `$(BARE_RUSTC)` variable, so we just
need to wire up something similar for run-make v2.

This is now set while building each `rmake.rs` itself, as well as in the
`rust-make-support` helpers for `rustc` and `rustdoc` commands. This is
also available in a `set_host_rpath` function for manual commands, like
in the `compiler-builtins` test.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 11, 2024

r? @jieyouxu

rustbot has assigned @jieyouxu.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) labels Apr 11, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 11, 2024

Some changes occurred in src/tools/compiletest

cc @jieyouxu

The run-make-support library was changed

cc @jieyouxu

Some changes occurred in run-make tests.

cc @jieyouxu

Copy link
Member

@jieyouxu jieyouxu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the fix, I believe this might also be the more general fix for run-make v2 tests breaking on sgx (cf. #123100) 💚

Feel free to r=me after fixing the PATH joining and splitting issue (which is more than likely entirely my fault for misleading 😆)

Comment on lines 3788 to 3791
let mut host_dylib_env_paths = String::new();
host_dylib_env_paths.push_str(&cwd.join(&self.config.compile_lib_path).to_string_lossy());
host_dylib_env_paths.push(':');
host_dylib_env_paths.push_str(&env::var(dylib_env_var()).unwrap());
Copy link
Member

@jieyouxu jieyouxu Apr 11, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This might need to use std::env::join_paths because dylib_env_var() expands to PATH on Windows, but Windows uses ; for PATH separator unlike : for everyone else. std::env::join_paths should handle this properly for the host platform at least. Expanding dylib_env_var() into its constituent paths will also need to use std::env::split_paths, and then repiece individual paths together with std::env::join_paths.

Copy link
Member

@jieyouxu jieyouxu Apr 11, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When I initially added the v2 infra, I was not aware std::env::join_paths existed and that Windows used ; separators for PATH not :, so there may be a couple more places where this bug exists that may have misled you into writing this (sorry 😆)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did wonder about that, but decided to leave it alone for the moment. I'll update these now.

Perhaps the is_windows() bit in run_make_support::run is also related? That seemed odd to me, but I don't want to touch Windows if it's working... 😅

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cmd.env(&ld_lib_path_envvar, {
let mut paths = vec![];
paths.push(PathBuf::from(env::var("TMPDIR").unwrap()));
for p in env::split_paths(&env::var("TARGET_RPATH_ENV").unwrap()) {
paths.push(p.to_path_buf());
}
for p in env::split_paths(&env::var(&ld_lib_path_envvar).unwrap()) {
paths.push(p.to_path_buf());
}
env::join_paths(paths.iter()).unwrap()
});
if is_windows() {
let mut paths = vec![];
for p in env::split_paths(&std::env::var("PATH").unwrap_or(String::new())) {
paths.push(p.to_path_buf());
}
paths.push(Path::new(&std::env::var("TARGET_RPATH_DIR").unwrap()).to_path_buf());
cmd.env("PATH", env::join_paths(paths.iter()).unwrap());
}

This bit is almost completely wrong, I did not know better at the time when this was written (I realize this is terribly broken now) 😆

Copy link
Member

@jieyouxu jieyouxu Apr 11, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll put up a fix for this lol EDIT: actually, could you propagate the fix for run_make_support::run as well? The logic in there for the ld_lib_path_envvar() should just use set_host_rpath(). All of

 cmd.env(&ld_lib_path_envvar, { 
     let mut paths = vec![]; 
     paths.push(PathBuf::from(env::var("TMPDIR").unwrap())); 
     for p in env::split_paths(&env::var("TARGET_RPATH_ENV").unwrap()) { 
         paths.push(p.to_path_buf()); 
     } 
     for p in env::split_paths(&env::var(&ld_lib_path_envvar).unwrap()) { 
         paths.push(p.to_path_buf()); 
     } 
     env::join_paths(paths.iter()).unwrap() 
 }); 
  
 if is_windows() { 
     let mut paths = vec![]; 
     for p in env::split_paths(&std::env::var("PATH").unwrap_or(String::new())) { 
         paths.push(p.to_path_buf()); 
     } 
     paths.push(Path::new(&std::env::var("TARGET_RPATH_DIR").unwrap()).to_path_buf()); 
     cmd.env("PATH", env::join_paths(paths.iter()).unwrap()); 
 } 

is just set_host_rpath() but actually wrong I think.

Copy link
Member

@jieyouxu jieyouxu Apr 11, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh I remember why there was a is_windows(): you're right, but conditionally right...

RUN has different environments depending on platform:

ifeq ($(UNAME),Darwin)
RUN = $(TARGET_RPATH_ENV) $(EXECUTE)
FAIL = $(TARGET_RPATH_ENV) $(EXECUTE) && exit 1 || exit 0
DYLIB_GLOB = lib$(1)*.dylib
DYLIB = $(TMPDIR)/lib$(1).dylib
STATICLIB = $(TMPDIR)/lib$(1).a
STATICLIB_GLOB = lib$(1)*.a
else
ifdef IS_WINDOWS
RUN = PATH="$(PATH):$(TARGET_RPATH_DIR)" $(EXECUTE)
FAIL = PATH="$(PATH):$(TARGET_RPATH_DIR)" $(EXECUTE) && exit 1 || exit 0
DYLIB_GLOB = $(1)*.dll
DYLIB = $(TMPDIR)/$(1).dll
ifdef IS_MSVC
STATICLIB = $(TMPDIR)/$(1).lib
STATICLIB_GLOB = $(1)*.lib
else
IMPLIB = $(TMPDIR)/lib$(1).dll.a
STATICLIB = $(TMPDIR)/lib$(1).a
STATICLIB_GLOB = lib$(1)*.a
endif
BIN = $(1).exe
LLVM_FILECHECK := $(shell cygpath -u "$(LLVM_FILECHECK)")
else
RUN = $(TARGET_RPATH_ENV) $(EXECUTE)
FAIL = $(TARGET_RPATH_ENV) $(EXECUTE) && exit 1 || exit 0
DYLIB_GLOB = lib$(1)*.so
DYLIB = $(TMPDIR)/lib$(1).so
STATICLIB = $(TMPDIR)/lib$(1).a
STATICLIB_GLOB = lib$(1)*.a
endif
endif

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

e.g. on windows it's RUN = PATH="$(PATH):$(TARGET_RPATH_DIR)" $(EXECUTE)...

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Safe to say, there's a lot of weird legacy there...

Copy link
Member

@jieyouxu jieyouxu Apr 11, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think then it's fine to leave run() as is, I'll go back to fix run() in a follow up PR. I don't want to block this PR for a different bug.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Filed #123832 to make sure I double check run_make_support::run

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

jieyouxu commented Apr 11, 2024

Also maybe edit PR CI to run i686-msvc and test-various after the PATH splitting/joining fix, so we can check if the changes might cause failures on Windows / WASM (it shouldn't after fixing the PATH splitting/joining), but it's better to bounce in PR CI than in full build CI.

@rustbot rustbot added the T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Apr 11, 2024
@cuviper
Copy link
Member Author

cuviper commented Apr 12, 2024

Also maybe edit PR CI to run i686-msvc and test-various after the PATH splitting/joining fix, so we can check if the changes might cause failures on Windows / WASM (it shouldn't after fixing the PATH splitting/joining), but it's better to bounce in PR CI than in full build CI.

All clear!
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions/runs/8654154411

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

Thanks!
@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 12, 2024

📌 Commit 7e171c7 has been approved by jieyouxu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 12, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#123599 (remove some things that do not need to be)
 - rust-lang#123763 (Set the host library path in run-make v2)
 - rust-lang#123775 (Make `PlaceRef` and `OperandValue::Ref` share a common `PlaceValue` type)
 - rust-lang#123789 (move QueryKeyStringCache from rustc_middle to rustc_query_impl, where it actually used)
 - rust-lang#123826 (Move rare overflow error to a cold function)
 - rust-lang#123827 (linker: Avoid some allocations in search directory iteration)
 - rust-lang#123829 (Fix revisions syntax in cfg(ub_checks) test)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit a510cbd into rust-lang:master Apr 12, 2024
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.79.0 milestone Apr 12, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#123763 - cuviper:host-rpath-run-make-v2, r=jieyouxu

Set the host library path in run-make v2

When the build is configured with `[rust] rpath = false`, we need to set
`LD_LIBRARY_PATH` (or equivalent) to what would have been the `RPATH`,
so the compiler can find its own libraries. The old `tools.mk` code has
this environment prefixed in the `$(BARE_RUSTC)` variable, so we just
need to wire up something similar for run-make v2.

This is now set while building each `rmake.rs` itself, as well as in the
`rust-make-support` helpers for `rustc` and `rustdoc` commands. This is
also available in a `set_host_rpath` function for manual commands, like
in the `compiler-builtins` test.
@cuviper cuviper deleted the host-rpath-run-make-v2 branch April 21, 2024 18:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants