-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Suggest calling method when first argument is self
#66913
Conversation
r? @varkor (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
The job Click to expand the log.
I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
056d901
to
e1dbbc8
Compare
Ping from triage: |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #67184) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Sorry @VirrageS, I didn't spot that you had updated the PR. One small tweak, and I think this is good to go :) |
📌 Commit 9273f59 has been approved by |
🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 100, this pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened |
Suggest calling method when first argument is `self` Closes: rust-lang#66782 I've explored different approaches for this MR but I think the most straightforward is the best one. I've tried to find out if the methods for given type exist (to maybe have a better suggestion), but we don't collect them anywhere and collecting them is quite problematic. Moreover, collecting all the methods would require rewriting big part of the code and also could potentially include performance degradation, which I don't think is necessary for this simple case.
Suggest calling method when first argument is `self` Closes: rust-lang#66782 I've explored different approaches for this MR but I think the most straightforward is the best one. I've tried to find out if the methods for given type exist (to maybe have a better suggestion), but we don't collect them anywhere and collecting them is quite problematic. Moreover, collecting all the methods would require rewriting big part of the code and also could potentially include performance degradation, which I don't think is necessary for this simple case.
Seems tidy checks failed in #67555 (comment), @bors r- |
@Centril could you look into MR, I've fixed all previous comments |
@bors r=varkor,Centril |
📌 Commit 7b91ef8 has been approved by |
Suggest calling method when first argument is `self` Closes: rust-lang#66782 I've explored different approaches for this MR but I think the most straightforward is the best one. I've tried to find out if the methods for given type exist (to maybe have a better suggestion), but we don't collect them anywhere and collecting them is quite problematic. Moreover, collecting all the methods would require rewriting big part of the code and also could potentially include performance degradation, which I don't think is necessary for this simple case.
Suggest calling method when first argument is `self` Closes: rust-lang#66782 I've explored different approaches for this MR but I think the most straightforward is the best one. I've tried to find out if the methods for given type exist (to maybe have a better suggestion), but we don't collect them anywhere and collecting them is quite problematic. Moreover, collecting all the methods would require rewriting big part of the code and also could potentially include performance degradation, which I don't think is necessary for this simple case.
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - #66913 (Suggest calling method when first argument is `self`) - #67531 (no longer promote non-pattern const functions) - #67773 (Add a test for #37333) - #67786 (Nix reexports from `rustc_span` in `syntax`) - #67789 (Cleanup linkchecker whitelist) - #67810 (Implement uncommon_codepoints lint.) - #67835 (tweak wording of mismatched delimiter errors) - #67845 (Also remove const-hack for abs) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Closes: #66782
I've explored different approaches for this MR but I think the most straightforward is the best one.
I've tried to find out if the methods for given type exist (to maybe have a better suggestion), but we don't collect them anywhere and collecting them is quite problematic. Moreover, collecting all the methods would require rewriting big part of the code and also could potentially include performance degradation, which I don't think is necessary for this simple case.