Use gender neutral terms #95757
Merged
Use gender neutral terms #95757
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
the
T-compiler
|
r? @dtolnay (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
dtolnay
approved these changes
Apr 7, 2022
|
@bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit ef59ab7 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 7, 2022
Rollup of 4 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#95189 (Stop flagging unexpected inner attributes as outer ones in certain diagnostics) - rust-lang#95752 (Regression test for rust-lang#82866) - rust-lang#95753 (Correct safety reasoning in `str::make_ascii_{lower,upper}case()`) - rust-lang#95757 (Use gender neutral terms) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#95508 was not executed well, but it did find a couple of legitimate issues: some uses of unnecessarily gendered language, and some typos. This PR fixes (properly) the legitimate issues it found.