Skip to content

Issues: sa-tre/satre-specification

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

65 Open 77 Closed
65 Open 77 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

[Discussion]: Clarify that segregation of e.g. shared services is logical, not physical discussion point A general discussion point for the community
#327 opened Oct 24, 2024 by manics
[Discussion]: Create new mailing list for SATRE working group discussion point A general discussion point for the community
#320 opened Jun 5, 2024 by manics
2
[Discussion]: Mismatch between Archimate and SATRE discussion point A general discussion point for the community
#312 opened Apr 10, 2024 by manics
1 task
2
SATRE Working group meeting 27th Feb: Input discussion point A general discussion point for the community
#310 opened Feb 26, 2024 by crickpetebarnsley
3
[Discussion]: Alignment of descriptive text with RFC keywords ("SHOULD" vs "MUST") discussion point A general discussion point for the community
#307 opened Oct 25, 2023 by tony-stone
[Change]: Suggest "Status" in place of "Importance" as name of concept proposed change A proposed change to the specification
#306 opened Oct 25, 2023 by tony-stone
[Discussion]: "Information Security" vs "Cyber Security" discussion point A general discussion point for the community
#288 opened Oct 9, 2023 by manics
[Change]: Review of Supporting Capabilities page proposed change A proposed change to the specification
#287 opened Oct 6, 2023 by jawsgrant
[Change]: Review of Data Management Page proposed change A proposed change to the specification
#285 opened Oct 5, 2023 by jawsgrant
[Change]: Review of Computing Technology page proposed change A proposed change to the specification
#284 opened Oct 5, 2023 by jawsgrant
[Change]: Review of Information Governance page proposed change A proposed change to the specification
#283 opened Oct 5, 2023 by jawsgrant
[Change]: Review of FAQs page proposed change A proposed change to the specification
#282 opened Oct 5, 2023 by jawsgrant
[Change]: Review of Roles page proposed change A proposed change to the specification
#281 opened Oct 5, 2023 by jawsgrant
1
[Change]: Review of architectural principles proposed change A proposed change to the specification
#280 opened Oct 5, 2023 by jawsgrant
[Change]: Review of Specification page proposed change A proposed change to the specification
#279 opened Oct 5, 2023 by jawsgrant
[Change]: Review of main landing page proposed change A proposed change to the specification
#278 opened Oct 5, 2023 by jawsgrant
[Discussion]: Should we add a 4th level of numbering to statements? discussion point A general discussion point for the community pillar: computing technology Computing technology pillar pillar: data management Data management pillar pillar: information governance Information governance pillar pillar: supporting Supporting capabilities proposed change A proposed change to the specification
#270 opened Oct 4, 2023 by manics
2
[Governance]: Activity log on contributions governance An issue about the governance of this repo & the community
#267 opened Oct 3, 2023 by crickpetebarnsley
3
[Governance]: White paper links collaboration cafe Reports from a collaboration cafe governance An issue about the governance of this repo & the community
#266 opened Oct 3, 2023 by crickpetebarnsley
4
[Governance]: Include evaluation statements in example evaluations future Something to be tackled by our future selves governance An issue about the governance of this repo & the community
#265 opened Oct 3, 2023 by crickpetebarnsley
@manics
1
Collab Cafe - 03/10/23 discussion point A general discussion point for the community
#262 opened Oct 2, 2023 by harisood
9 tasks
[Change]: Define spec in a machine readable format (e.g. YAML, or other), and generate text from that discussion point A general discussion point for the community proposed change A proposed change to the specification
#254 opened Sep 28, 2023 by manics
2
[Discussion]: Automatically test the generation of the evaluation spreadsheet discussion point A general discussion point for the community WP1
#249 opened Sep 21, 2023 by manics
[Change]: Vulnerability Management: networking proposed change A proposed change to the specification
#235 opened Sep 12, 2023 by jemrobinson
@jemrobinson
[Change]: Clarify 2.4.5 proposed change A proposed change to the specification
#209 opened Aug 18, 2023 by rmbaxter67
2
ProTip! Adding no:label will show everything without a label.