-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 487
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Deprecate cotangent methods named "cotan" to "cot" #29412
Milestone
Comments
Branch: public/29412 |
Commit: |
Author: Dave Morris |
comment:6
Batch modifying tickets that will likely not be ready for 9.1, based on a review of the ticket title, branch/review status, and last modification date. |
comment:7
This looks good to me. |
Reviewer: Markus Wageringel |
comment:8
Thanks for the review! |
Changed branch from public/29412 to |
mkoeppe
added a commit
to mkoeppe/sage
that referenced
this issue
Sep 21, 2023
vbraun
pushed a commit
to vbraun/sage
that referenced
this issue
Sep 23, 2023
, sagemath#24483, sagemath#24371, sagemath#24511, sagemath#25848, sagemath#26105, sagemath#28481, sagemath#29010, sagemath#29412, sagemath#30332, sagemath#30372, sagemath#31345, sagemath#32375, sagemath#32606, sagemath#32610, sagemath#32612, sagemath#32641, sagemath#32660, sagemath#32750, sagemath#32869, sagemath#33602 <!-- ^^^^^ Please provide a concise, informative and self-explanatory title. Don't put issue numbers in there, do this in the PR body below. For example, instead of "Fixes sagemath#1234" use "Introduce new method to calculate 1+1" --> <!-- Describe your changes here in detail --> <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> <!-- If this PR resolves an open issue, please link to it here. For example "Fixes sagemath#12345". --> <!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it appropriately. --> ### 📝 Checklist <!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> <!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it appropriately --> <!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> <!-- Feel free to remove irrelevant items. --> - [x] The title is concise, informative, and self-explanatory. - [ ] The description explains in detail what this PR is about. - [x] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion. - [ ] I have created tests covering the changes. - [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly. ### ⌛ Dependencies <!-- List all open PRs that this PR logically depends on - sagemath#12345: short description why this is a dependency - sagemath#34567: ... --> <!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> URL: sagemath#36307 Reported by: Matthias Köppe Reviewer(s):
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Most of sage uses
cot
for the cotangent function1/tan(x)
, but the classesComplexNumber
andMPComplexNumber
have methods that are calledcotan
, instead. To eliminate a bug caused by this inconsistency, ticket #29409 renames these methods tocot
.For backward compatibility, ticket #29409 defines
cotan
as an alias forcot
in these two classes. This ticket deprecates those aliases.FWIW, Maple uses
cot
and Mathematica usesCot
.Depends on #29409
Component: numerical
Keywords: cotangent, complex
Author: Dave Morris
Branch/Commit:
b78b409
Reviewer: Markus Wageringel
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29412
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: