-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 487
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pullbacks (preimages) of manifold subsets under continuous maps #31688
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Dependencies: #31883 |
Commit: |
Author: Matthias Koeppe |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. Last 10 new commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:67
A minor point: to generate correctly the documentation, the following change shall be made in the docstring of - - ``map`` - an instance of :class:`ContinuousMap`,
+ - ``map`` - an instance of :class:`~sage.manifolds.continuous_map.ContinuousMap`,
:class:`ScalarField`, or :class:`Chart` For |
comment:68
This example in the doctstring of
|
comment:70
Replying to @egourgoulhon:
Indeed. Looks like I had forgotten to actually implement this case. Done now |
comment:71
Thanks for the update. As soon as the patchbot visits the ticket and is green, the ticket can be set to positive review. |
comment:72
OK, since the changes since the last time the patchbot visited the ticket are quite minor, let us move on without waiting for another visit. Thank you for the new features introduced here! |
comment:73
Thanks for the review! |
comment:74
Replying to @egourgoulhon:
It seems that we don't have any patchbot at the moment: |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1 and set ticket back to needs_review. New commits:
|
comment:77
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Changed branch from u/mkoeppe/pullbacks_of_manifold_subsets_under_continuous_maps to |
Similar to #31653, given a continuous map
\Phi: N -> M
and a manifold subsetS
ofM
, we define the pullback (preimage) ofS
as the subset ofN
of pointsp
with\Phi(p)
inS
.Given a real scalar field
Phi: N -> R
and aRealSet
S
, we define the pullback in the same way.Also, we view a chart
C
as a continuous functionPhi: C.domain() -> R^n
and allow pulling back any subset ofR^n
(an object with a__contains__
method; for example polyhedra, lattices, linear subspaces, tensor modules) by it as well.In all cases, because
Phi
is continuous, topological closures/interiors pull back.An application is in #31981.
Depends on #31883
Depends on #31904
Depends on #31653
Depends on #31916
Depends on #31644
Depends on #31959
Depends on #31990
Depends on #21243
CC: @egourgoulhon @tscrim @mjungmath
Component: manifolds
Author: Matthias Koeppe
Branch/Commit:
4558e26
Reviewer: Eric Gourgoulhon
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31688
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: