Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sage.schemes: Replace imports from sage.*.all for namespace packages #35033

Conversation

mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

@mkoeppe mkoeppe commented Feb 9, 2023

📚 Description

Closes #34951

📝 Checklist

  • I have made sure that the title is self-explanatory and the description concisely explains the PR.
  • I have linked an issue or discussion.
  • I have created tests covering the changes.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

⌛ Dependencies

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 9, 2023

Codecov Report

Base: 88.58% // Head: 88.59% // Increases project coverage by +0.01% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (f53eb61) compared to base (05329f6).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop   #35033      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    88.58%   88.59%   +0.01%     
===========================================
  Files         2140     2140              
  Lines       396998   397100     +102     
===========================================
+ Hits        351676   351808     +132     
+ Misses       45322    45292      -30     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/sage/schemes/affine/affine_morphism.py 90.33% <100.00%> (ø)
src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/BSD.py 43.75% <100.00%> (+0.21%) ⬆️
src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/cardinality.py 87.54% <100.00%> (+0.14%) ⬆️
src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/cm.py 89.52% <100.00%> (+0.39%) ⬆️
.../sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_curve_isogeny.py 94.92% <100.00%> (ø)
src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_field.py 80.92% <100.00%> (ø)
...c/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_finite_field.py 87.92% <100.00%> (+0.17%) ⬆️
src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_generic.py 93.23% <100.00%> (-0.14%) ⬇️
...age/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_modular_symbols.py 90.15% <100.00%> (ø)
...c/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_number_field.py 92.24% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 63 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkoeppe commented Feb 9, 2023

Doctest failure in sage/schemes/toric/sheaf/klyachko.py is an unrelated random failure

@yyyyx4
Copy link
Member

yyyyx4 commented Feb 9, 2023

Indeed, that appears to be #32773.

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkoeppe commented Feb 9, 2023

Thank you!

@github-actions
Copy link

Documentation preview for this PR is ready! 🎉
Built with commit: f53eb61

@vbraun vbraun merged commit 0847642 into sagemath:develop Mar 3, 2023
@mkoeppe mkoeppe added this to the sage-10.0 milestone Mar 3, 2023
vbraun pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2023
…e is_NumberFieldElement

    
<!-- ^^^^^
Please provide a concise, informative and self-explanatory title.
Don't put issue numbers in there, do this in the PR body below.
For example, instead of "Fixes #1234" use "Introduce new method to
calculate 1+1"
-->
### 📚 Description
Fixes #34931

<!-- Describe your changes here in detail -->
<!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? -->
<!-- If it resolves an open issue, please link to the issue here. For
example "Closes #1337" -->

### 📝 Checklist

<!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. -->
<!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it
appropriately -->
<!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're
here to help! -->

- [x] I have made sure that the title is self-explanatory and the
description concisely explains the PR.
- [x] I have linked an issue or discussion.
- [ ] I have created tests covering the changes.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly.

### ⌛ Dependencies
<!-- List all open pull requests that this PR logically depends on -->
<!--
- #xyz: short description why this is a dependency
- #abc: ...
-->
Depends on #35033
    
URL: #35100
Reported by: Matthias Köppe
Reviewer(s): Matthias Köppe, Travis Scrimshaw
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

sage.schemes: Replace imports from sage.*.all for namespace packages
5 participants