-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 487
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sage.groups.matrix_gps
: Modularization fixes for imports
#35306
sage.groups.matrix_gps
: Modularization fixes for imports
#35306
Conversation
…___all_for_namespace_packages' into matrix_groups_modularization
sage.groups.matrix_gps
: Modularization fixes for imports
…te ..._gap module
…nitefield' into matrix_groups_modularization
…ce of is_MatrixGroup, is_ArithmeticSubgroup
… back to _generic
Codecov ReportPatch coverage:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #35306 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 88.62% 88.61% -0.02%
===========================================
Files 2148 2155 +7
Lines 398855 398915 +60
===========================================
+ Hits 353480 353484 +4
- Misses 45375 45431 +56
... and 28 files with indirect coverage changes Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
SageMath version 10.0.beta7, Release Date: 2023-04-01
…ite_rings' when GF is involved, add '# optional - sage.symbolic'
SageMath version 10.0.beta8, Release Date: 2023-04-06
Looks good in the first pass. Would you put the boilerplate things like copyright notices in the new files? |
…lame -M -C -w --date=format:%Y FILE.py | sort -k2'
Done. |
0aeb747
to
bea635b
Compare
…sed on 'git blame -M -C -w --date=format:%Y FILE.py | sort -k2'
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks.
Documentation preview for this PR is ready! 🎉 |
Thank you! |
I'm getting a test failure on Arch with system GAP 4.12.2 after this
Strangely, the exact same test passed when it was in |
To examine the failure, I tried to run
Next I tried to run What did I wrong? I have zero experience in testing sage on linux platforms, by the way. |
It's probably a bug in tox file. Anyway, you can just run archlinux in Docker, and build Sage there the usual way. |
Yes. This is a good opportunity for me to try sage on linux. |
After some more testing, it seems to be the line
which triggers this. It is somehow interfering with the random generator status of GAP.
was marked as |
tagging everything
(this is both for pexpect and libgap interfaces - probably just one of these is needed) |
That's done in the |
Things get weirder, it depends on the order in which P and Psmaller are defined:
vs
|
How about replacing the iffy test with
|
I finally figured out why this happens only when using system gap: the difference is the |
📚 Description
We move the
...MatrixGroup_gap
classes to separate modules named..._gap
.This is part of:
📝 Checklist
⌛ Dependencies
is_FiniteField
etc., makesage.rings.finite_rings
a namespace package #35119