Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Japanese: Improve view_submission listener document to mention ack() + response_action patterns #1131

Closed
4 of 10 tasks
seratch opened this issue Sep 24, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1154
Closed
4 of 10 tasks
Assignees
Labels
docs M-T: Documentation work only good first issue Good for newcomers
Milestone

Comments

@seratch
Copy link
Member

seratch commented Sep 24, 2021

Description

This issue is a task to apply #1124 changes to its corresponding Japanese page.

We've received similar questions before but as you can see here: #1123 (comment), using ack() with response_action over views.update API method in view_submission listeners is not obvious for developers. We can improve this document section to mention the proper way to update a modal in response to view_submission.

What type of issue is this? (place an x in one of the [ ])

  • bug
  • enhancement (feature request)
  • question
  • documentation related
  • example code related
  • testing related
  • discussion

Requirements (place an x in each of the [ ])

  • I've read and understood the Contributing guidelines and have done my best effort to follow them.
  • I've read and agree to the Code of Conduct.
  • I've searched for any related issues and avoided creating a duplicate issue.
@seratch seratch added docs M-T: Documentation work only good first issue Good for newcomers labels Sep 24, 2021
@seratch seratch added this to the 3.x milestone Sep 24, 2021
@seratch seratch modified the milestones: 3.x, 3.8.0 Oct 28, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs M-T: Documentation work only good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants