-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Aptos (combined branch) #13716
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Aptos (combined branch) #13716
Conversation
plugin := env.NewPlugin("aptos") | ||
loopKs := &keystore.AptosLooppSigner{Aptos: ks} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps all this can be moved into InitAptos?
return flat | ||
} | ||
|
||
const triggerID = "mock-streams-trigger@1.0.0" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like having this merged as an example trigger. I only wish it could go to common but it can't because of EVM dep :( Maybe we should create a special sub-directory with example capabilities and move on-demand trigger there as well...? @cedric-cordenier thoughts?
@@ -206,6 +207,13 @@ func NewApplication(opts ApplicationOpts) (Application, error) { | |||
opts.CapabilitiesRegistry = capabilities.NewRegistry(globalLogger) | |||
} | |||
|
|||
// Use a recurring trigger with mock data for testing purposes |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Testing where? Can it be under some flag? It doesn't seem right to always add it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll move this inside the mock_trigger.go
, that way it's only used if the capability is used
49f092c
to
bf2f114
Compare
I see you updated files related to
|
256f0c2
to
fea5866
Compare
820f8f6
to
e01302f
Compare
1a2e235
to
b730639
Compare
9abfa6f
to
c4351e3
Compare
b2923aa
to
5fcb275
Compare
c4351e3
to
2caac81
Compare
5fcb275
to
8a5a6d4
Compare
2caac81
to
01aec7a
Compare
e9b4b43
to
0930f22
Compare
01aec7a
to
5e26147
Compare
e255623
to
b73c5ff
Compare
b73c5ff
to
491a121
Compare
6453f9f
to
0bf0cc1
Compare
Quality Gate failedFailed conditions See analysis details on SonarQube Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarLint |
Contains #14076, #14078 and staged changes