-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 985
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: wallet select address screen UI in empty state #17248
Conversation
Jenkins BuildsClick to see older builds (75)
|
5616c32
to
cda6d93
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice work!
input-value (atom "") | ||
selected-tab (reagent/atom (:id (first tabs-data)))] | ||
(fn [{:keys [theme]}] | ||
[rn/scroll-view |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe that we don't need the scroll view as the root/parent, as only the content inside the tabs
should be scrollable. WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is this scroll view for?
I believe the scrollable content would the FlatList
of the currently focused tab, and its header would be the part above the list that needs to scroll as well
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Scroll is disabled in the ScrollView, it is just used to dismiss the keyboard when touching outside of the address input
(when-not (empty? @clipboard) | ||
(on-change @clipboard) | ||
(reset! value @clipboard))) | ||
(clipboard/get-string |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
❤️
@@ -166,7 +167,8 @@ | |||
;; from ScrollView (e.g. FlatList). There are open issues, here's | |||
;; just one about this topic: | |||
;; https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/31218 | |||
:content-container-style {:padding-top (dec unread-count-offset)} | |||
:content-container-style (merge content-style |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
assoc
is a good choice here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we call this prop container-style
as it's essentially the outer later? 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
content-container-style
is most accurate actually, but we can simplify with container-style
yes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well whatever is most accurate, container-style is what we're referring to add to the most outer view to add margin etc,
[rn/view {:style style/account-switcher-placeholder}] | ||
[rn/touchable-opacity | ||
{:style style/account-switcher-placeholder | ||
:on-press #(js/alert "Not implemented yet")}] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this should just take an on-press and the not implemented should be set from the app code 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agree, but maybe is better to refactor once #16456 is done since it will need to be refactored anyway and use a dropdown variant with emoji
{:margin-horizontal 20 | ||
:margin-vertical 12}) | ||
|
||
(defn divider |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we might have a divider component? 🤔
[rn/touchable-opacity | ||
{:style style/account-switcher-placeholder | ||
:on-press #(js/alert "Not implemented yet")}] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We agreed to use pressable
instead of other touchable components.
@ilmotta should we add this to the guidelines? I see touchable-opacity
still often being used in new PRs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed @OmarBasem. I noticed in the last what, one month?, we started to use pressable
a lot more. I see 30+ usages already, and it looks like the team already agrees with this decision, so it's easy to add to the guidelines :)
This is a good example of using the :deprecated
metadata in the touchable-opacity
function. Could even be more effective than the guideline, or both tactics could be used of course.
(def ^{:deprecated "Superseded by react-native.core/pressable"} touchable-opacity
(reagent/adapt-react-class (.-TouchableOpacity ^js react-native)))
input-value (atom "") | ||
selected-tab (reagent/atom (:id (first tabs-data)))] | ||
(fn [{:keys [theme]}] | ||
[rn/scroll-view |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is this scroll view for?
I believe the scrollable content would the FlatList
of the currently focused tab, and its header would be the part above the list that needs to scroll as well
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice work @briansztamfater! I focused my comments mostly on performance, but they're not blockers at all, also to start to raise awareness about some recurring perf problems I see in PRs.
(clipboard/get-string | ||
(fn [clipboard] | ||
(when-not (empty? clipboard) | ||
(on-change clipboard) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@briansztamfater, my feedback to this address-input
component is not originating from your PR, but it may be helpful for the future nonetheless.
Especially for components that wrap text inputs we should be more careful about performance. Every time the value
state changes, the whole address-input
component is recomputed by Reagent, all functions in the let bindings are redefined, and so on. A good chunk of the hiccup tree doesn't need to be recomputed on every key up event.
It's easy to fix these things while we're writing/creating the code, but after it's merged probably nobody will refactor this, and these things all add up to a slow app. In an ideal world, we should be slicing hiccup more diligently to minimize recomputation because the default performance we get by ignoring this practice is not good, as we all know.
[rn/touchable-opacity | ||
{:style style/account-switcher-placeholder | ||
:on-press #(js/alert "Not implemented yet")}] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed @OmarBasem. I noticed in the last what, one month?, we started to use pressable
a lot more. I see 30+ usages already, and it looks like the team already agrees with this decision, so it's easy to add to the guidelines :)
This is a good example of using the :deprecated
metadata in the touchable-opacity
function. Could even be more effective than the guideline, or both tactics could be used of course.
(def ^{:deprecated "Superseded by react-native.core/pressable"} touchable-opacity
(reagent/adapt-react-class (.-TouchableOpacity ^js react-native)))
314be45
to
d171a56
Compare
[{:keys [blur? padding-top padding-bottom theme]}] | ||
{:border-color (if blur? | ||
(colors/theme-colors colors/neutral-80-opa-5 colors/white-opa-5 theme) | ||
(colors/theme-colors colors/neutral-10 colors/neutral-90 theme)) | ||
:padding-top 12 | ||
:padding-bottom 8 | ||
:padding-top (when padding-top padding-top) | ||
:padding-bottom (when padding-bottom padding-bottom) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@J-Son89 refactored divider component so padding top / bottom can be customized as it had some hardcoded values. There were no usage of this component as far as I could search (previous to integrating it on this PR as you suggested), so this shouldn't affect other screens or components.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice one, curious though should it be margin instead? Perhaps it's all the same however 🤷♂️
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It think it is the same for the purpose of this view
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh actually, if this is an external prop passed in it's better to just use a 'container-style' prop that gets merged to this style object. It's what we are doing for all other quo2 components.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep that sounds better, I updated with that approach
3086515
to
72e2660
Compare
72e2660
to
a396668
Compare
Signed-off-by: Brian Sztamfater <brian@status.im>
a396668
to
1c54664
Compare
fixes #16853
fixes #16890
fixes #16889
fixes #16891
Summary
Implement Select Address screen UI in empty state
sendemotyuilight.mp4
sendemptyscreendark.mp4
Platforms
Steps to test
status: ready