Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix for Ensure that GA modules don't depend on beta functionality #181 #228

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 28, 2019
Merged

Conversation

kopachevsky
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #181

Copy link
Contributor

@ivankorn ivankorn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kopachevsky, do we need to remove provider definition in examples or or just update it with stable?

examples/node_pool/main.tf Show resolved Hide resolved
examples/shared_vpc/main.tf Show resolved Hide resolved
examples/simple_regional/main.tf Show resolved Hide resolved
examples/simple_regional_private/main.tf Show resolved Hide resolved
examples/simple_zonal/main.tf Show resolved Hide resolved
examples/simple_zonal_private/main.tf Show resolved Hide resolved
examples/stub_domains/main.tf Show resolved Hide resolved
examples/upstream_nameservers/main.tf Show resolved Hide resolved
examples/upstream_nameservers/main.tf Show resolved Hide resolved
CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
autogen/auth.tf Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -193,7 +193,11 @@ resource "google_container_cluster" "primary" {
Create regional node pools
*****************************************/
resource "google_container_node_pool" "pools" {
{% if private_cluster or beta_cluster %}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need beta for "private_cluster" ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no, will check this remaining one

ingwarr
ingwarr previously approved these changes Aug 14, 2019
ingwarr
ingwarr previously approved these changes Aug 15, 2019
@kopachevsky kopachevsky marked this pull request as ready for review August 15, 2019 18:47
@kopachevsky
Copy link
Contributor Author

@morgante something wrong with this PR, workload-metadata-config failing with terraform crash, investigating why

@kopachevsky
Copy link
Contributor Author

False alarm, issue in previously merged PR

@aaron-lane aaron-lane added the bug Something isn't working label Aug 16, 2019
ingwarr
ingwarr previously approved these changes Aug 20, 2019
@ivankorn
Copy link
Contributor

@kopachevsky
Do you have a fix for integration tests ?

run-tests-beta-cluster
task config 'pull-request/test/ci/beta-cluster.yml' not found

Copy link
Contributor

@ivankorn ivankorn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kopachevsky
Should we wait for integration tests to start passing ?
https://concourse.infra.cft.tips/builds/6551

autogen/cluster.tf Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
autogen/variables.tf Show resolved Hide resolved
autogen/variables.tf Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Beta functionality removed fully from public and private cluster modules and related exampled.
As long node_pool example used taints that in beta, it switched to public-cluster-beta module from root one.

 * Fixes #181
@morgante morgante merged commit c1ecd54 into terraform-google-modules:master Aug 28, 2019
CPL-markus pushed a commit to WALTER-GROUP/terraform-google-kubernetes-engine that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2024
Fix for Ensure that GA modules don't depend on beta functionality terraform-google-modules#181
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Ensure that GA modules don't depend on beta functionality
6 participants