-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 721
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
errs: remove redundant FastGenWithCause
in ZapError
#7497
Conversation
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
ZapError
FastGenWithCause
in ZapError
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #7497 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 74.66% 74.59% -0.07%
==========================================
Files 454 454
Lines 50142 50142
==========================================
- Hits 37437 37404 -33
- Misses 9392 9403 +11
- Partials 3313 3335 +22
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ func ZapError(err error, causeError ...error) zap.Field { | |||
} | |||
if e, ok := err.(*errors.Error); ok { | |||
if len(causeError) >= 1 { | |||
err = e.Wrap(causeError[0]).FastGenWithCause() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need to check other FastGenWithCause
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, I forgot about other direct use cases
Signed-off-by: Cabinfever_B <cabinfeveroier@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
/merge |
@nolouch: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests: /run-all-tests You only need to trigger
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: 3efb9a3
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
close tikv#7496 Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
close #7496 Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io> Signed-off-by: Cabinfever_B <cabinfeveroier@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Yongbo Jiang <cabinfeveroier@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Cabinfever_B <cabinfeveroier@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: ti-chi-bot[bot] <108142056+ti-chi-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: Close #7496
What is changed and how does it work?
Check List
Tests
after
some example
Code changes
Side effects
Related changes
pingcap/docs
/pingcap/docs-cn
:pingcap/tiup
:Release note