-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Handle differing workflow parameters between wts qc and wgs qc #611
Handle differing workflow parameters between wts qc and wgs qc #611
Conversation
Set to true for WGS qc
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, Alexis!
Might hold this while we tinker with the rrna filtering, quant metrics etc that we might also need to add in to the wts qc configuration |
Okie, dokie..! Saw those discussion, yes. |
Related infra pull umccr/infrastructure#334 |
Dont raise error if key doesn't exist
* This is mandatory for SecondaryAnalysisHelper construct. At the mo, both wgs_alignment_qc and wts_alignment_qc are pointing to the same DRAGEN workflow at ICA CWL. * This fixes Ocicat e2e run issue at QC step in DEV. Related * #334 * umccr/data-portal-apis#611
WGS
WTS