Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Move pre/post rewrite cost to the RewriteStrategy API #276

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2023

Conversation

aborgna-q
Copy link
Collaborator

Expose the rewrite cost delta functions

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 15, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (35eab74) 83.72% compared to head (e5e2d37) 83.78%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #276      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.72%   83.78%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          35       35              
  Lines        4313     4347      +34     
  Branches     4197     4200       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         3611     3642      +31     
+ Misses        517      516       -1     
- Partials      185      189       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@lmondada lmondada left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! I had written the same code on my branch 😅

@lmondada lmondada added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 18, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit e470fa0 Dec 18, 2023
11 checks passed
@lmondada lmondada deleted the feat/strategy-cost branch December 18, 2023 09:30
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 24, 2024
## 🤖 New release
* `tket2`: 0.1.0-alpha.1

<details><summary><i><b>Changelog</b></i></summary><p>

## `tket2`
<blockquote>

##
[0.0.0-alpha.1](https://github.com/CQCL/tket2/releases/tag/tket2-v0.0.0-alpha.1)
- 2024-05-24

### Bug Fixes
- Check for rewrite composition in badger
([#255](#255))
- induced cycles in depth optimisation
([#264](#264))
- Encode opaque symbolic constants
([#273](#273))
- Correctly detect custom ops by name
([#281](#281))
- Track input linear units in `Command`
([#310](#310))
- Don't convert tket2 measurements into tket1 ops
([#331](#331))

### Documentation
- Expand the main module and README docs
([#298](#298))

### New Features
- add angle type to tket2 extension
([#231](#231))
- bindings for circuit cost and hash
([#252](#252))
- Implement `PyErr` conversion locally in `tket2-py`
([#258](#258))
- Add a "progress timeout" to badger
([#259](#259))
- [**breaking**] Add lexicographic cost
([#270](#270))
- rewrite tracing ([#267](#267))
- Move pre/post rewrite cost to the RewriteStrategy API
([#276](#276))
- [**breaking**] Lexicographic cost fn
([#277](#277))
- Return rewrite strategies as a generator
([#275](#275))
- add qalloc, qfree, reset ops
([#284](#284))
- [**breaking**] Support any ops in portmatching
([#293](#293))
- Add `PatternMatch::nodes` and `subcircuit` + matching example
([#299](#299))
- Use `IncomingPort` and `OutgoingPort` instead of `Port` where
possible. ([#296](#296))
- expose Tk2Op name ([#307](#307))

### Refactor
- Move tket2 code to a workspace member
([#210](#210))
- Restructure the python code
([#211](#211))
- s/taso/badger/ ([#228](#228))
- Move python bindings from `tket2` to `tket2-py`
([#235](#235))
- rename t2op ([#256](#256))

### Testing
- Add small parallel badger test
([#237](#237))
- fix non-deterministic badger test
([#245](#245))
</blockquote>


</p></details>

---
This PR was generated with
[release-plz](https://github.com/MarcoIeni/release-plz/).

---------

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Agustin Borgna <agustin.borgna@quantinuum.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants