Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release 0.9.69 #3488

Merged
merged 30 commits into from
Feb 23, 2020
Merged

Release 0.9.69 #3488

merged 30 commits into from
Feb 23, 2020

Conversation

DinosaurierRex
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

BeinhAlex and others added 30 commits January 23, 2020 11:37
CATROID-265 fix double quotes in project download
Empty formulas are now correctly displayed, if the ShowVariable brick is used
CATROID-235 Start running stitch with length 10
CATROID-449 move end2end tests against share to nightly runs
CATROID-395 Stop current stitch
- use correct dependencies and imports
- remove deprecated version of InstrumentationProvider
CATROID-452 Add language test for modulo function
- Derive a new class VisualPlacementBrick from FormulaBrick and move the logic for visual placement from the PlaceAtBrick class to this new base class to prevent code duplication.

- Add an entry "Place Visually" also in the ScriptFragment of the GlideToBrick.

- Refactor the testcase PlaceAtBrickTest and make a new Test for VisualPlacementBricks to test that visual placement both works for GlideToBricks and PlaceAtBricks.
CATROID-182 Add visual placement to the GlideToBrick
CATROID-232 Start zigzag stitch with length 2 and width 10
Refactor the variable name of the string resource as it is now possible that the GlideToBrick can be placed visually as well. In order to prevent misleading.
CATROID-396 Start triple stitch with length 10
CATROID-374 Implement sharing WebView Login automatically
CATROID-464 Refactor string resource 'Place Visually'
@wslany wslany merged commit 36dab46 into master Feb 23, 2020
@wslany wslany deleted the release-0.9.69 branch February 23, 2020 23:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants