default-gcc-version: 12 -> 13 if !isDarwin && !isAarch64 #268097
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ghost
mentioned this pull request
21 tasks
ghost
marked this pull request as ready for review
|
Note: the builds ( |
|
I've started building the entire, full release jobset ( Not sure how long this will take. I'm using my own tooling instead of the Hydra software, and it tends to get stuck a lot. We'll see how it goes. |
fgaz
added a commit
to fgaz/nixpkgs
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2023
This can be reverted when we switch to gcc 13 (NixOS#268097)
14 tasks
fgaz
added a commit
to fgaz/nixpkgs
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2023
riscv64 is failing due to missing atomic ops in gcc 12. This commit works around the problem by linking against libatomic. It can be reverted when we switch to gcc 13 (NixOS#268097)
fgaz
added a commit
to fgaz/nixpkgs
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2023
riscv64 is failing due to missing atomic ops in gcc 12. This commit works around the problem by linking against libatomic. It can be reverted when we switch to gcc 13 (NixOS#268097)
After many
When was the last time an entire release jobset was built by anything other than |
ghost
mentioned this pull request
Closed
AndersonTorres
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 22, 2023
riscv64 is failing due to missing atomic ops in gcc 12. This commit works around the problem by linking against libatomic. It can be reverted when we switch to gcc 13 (#268097)
ghost
mentioned this pull request
|
Alright, I'm running one last pass of the leftovers (~1,723 jobs) and I'll triage what's left after that. |
Comment on lines
41
to
43
| env = lib.optionalAttrs (stdenv.cc.isGNU && lib.versionAtLeast stdenv.cc.cc.version "13") { | ||
| NIX_CFLAGS_COMPILE = "-w"; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do they pass Werr? If so we should remove that instead
|
I have filtered the following derivations which are FODs for no-longer-available (and not on |
ghost
requested review from
piegamesde,
jtojnar,
adisbladis and
ttuegel
as code owners
Try reverting this on a future ROCm release. Addresses: #271943
ghost
marked this pull request as draft
ghost
marked this pull request as ready for review
|
|
|
This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/3058 |
Does it build now? |
Indeed it did!
Indeed it does! |
13 tasks
12 tasks
|
This broke Traced back to which sets |
|
Possibly more packages to look into
|
This was referenced Dec 14, 2023
13 tasks
13 tasks
13 tasks
|
This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there: |
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
https://nixpk.gs/pr-tracker.html?pr=268097
Did this PR break your package? Please read before posting.
Please accept my apologies.
This PR is expected to break up to 321 out of the 16,938 packages in nixpkgs. I fixed all of the non-leaf packages, but there were simply too many for me to handle all of the leaf packages by myself.
Before posting below, please try these easy fixes:
disable-warnings-if-gcc13around your package. Example:https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/9855b101b3f2e7759ca8daaa9ff6cca1c90a4a7d/pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix#L12535-L12537
pin-to-gcc12-if-gcc13around your package. Example:https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/9855b101b3f2e7759ca8daaa9ff6cca1c90a4a7d/pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix#L2792
Thanks, and again, sorry about the breakage.
0900 UTCtoday (2023-Dec-07) unless somebody objects. I don't think anybody else has the compute to test this PR, so I will take all the blame for any breakage. See next section for what I expect.Testing against
staging(i.e. "as-will-be-merged")Note: a "job" means one top-level attrpath, like
python3Packages.pycairo, on one platform (currentlyx86_64-linux). This corresponds to one derivation and many outpaths. Not every derivation corresponds to a job; there are about 115,167 derivations in the closure of the 16,938 jobs' derivations -- I think Hydra counts every derivation in the closure as a "job".For the
release-combinedjobset forx86_64-linuxbuilt at 195e990 as ofThu Dec 7 05:56:55 UTC 2023Not all 321 failures are due to this PR -- that number includes any packages that already failed to build on
x86_64-linuxas of 7629c42. The rest will require individual attention from their maintainers. I applied fixes (either-Wno-erroror pinning togcc12Stdenv) to all of the non-leaf packages that were broken. What remains is going to require ~321 individual fixes from the maintainers of those packages, and I'm getting a little bit burned out.In a few cases (mainly
deepin) the package expressions were so complicated that I could not figure out how to properly override withstdenv = gcc12Stdenv. Big thanks to @Madouura for doing most of that (and showing me how to do the rest) forrocmPackages.Job lists as of
Thu Dec 7 03:12:05 UTC 2023:Earlier testing against
release-23.11branchMore than 99% of the full release jobset builds correctly with this PR (less than 1% fail), so I think it's getting to the point of diminishing returns for pre-merge fixes... right now
staging/masterare starting to diverge faster than I can fix things. So I would like to proceed with merging this.release-smalljobset has built successfully on Shesha.release-combinedjobset is completeOut of 51,255 derivations, using
release-23.11as the base branch:List of failed derivations
Will need Hydra for the Darwin builds.
Includes:
Description of changes
Things done
x86_64-linuxtests.cross.sanityx86_64-linuxworkstation+serverpowerpc64le-linuxworkstation+serveraarch64-linuxworkstation (cross fromx86_64-linux)mips64el-linuxrouter (cross fromx86_64-linux)