Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: seeds button uptake #3677

Merged
merged 45 commits into from
Nov 29, 2023
Merged

feat: seeds button uptake #3677

merged 45 commits into from
Nov 29, 2023

Conversation

jaredcwhite
Copy link
Collaborator

@jaredcwhite jaredcwhite commented Oct 12, 2023

Issue Overview

This PR addresses #3595

  • This change addresses the issue in full
  • This change addresses only certain aspects of the issue
  • This change is a dependency for another issue
  • This change has a dependency from another issue

Description

This PR swaps out all UIC buttons with Seeds buttons in the Core applications. Note that this doesn't address any buttons which may be embedded within other UIC components.

How Can This Be Tested/Reviewed?

Visit pages in the Public and Partners sites. Ensure that the buttons work and aren't broken. I noticed some translations have odd capitalization, which means you can now tell (because the old buttons were ALL CAPPS), but I would recommend addressing those in followup PRs.

NOTE: there are two Cypress tests for Partners which I cannot figure how to resolve. The error messages are confusing and don't make sense. Also note: the jest-shared-helpers test is failing, but that's due to an apparent TypeScript issue coming from Seeds, so if we want to resolve that we'll need to address in a separate issue/PR in that repo.

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have added QA notes to the issue with applicable URLs
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have reviewed the changes in a desktop view
  • I have reviewed the changes in a mobile view
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
  • I have assigned reviewers
  • I have run yarn generate:client and/or created a migration if I made backend changes that require them
  • My commit message(s) is/are polished, and any breaking changes are indicated in the message and are well-described
  • Commits made across packages purposefully have the same commit message/version change, else are separated into different commits

Reviewer Notes:

Steps to review a PR:

  • Read and understand the issue, and ensure the author has added QA notes
  • Review the code itself from a style point of view
  • Pull the changes down locally and test that the acceptance criteria is met
  • Also review the acceptance criteria on the Netlify deploy preview (noting that these do not yet include any backend changes made in the PR)
  • Either explicitly ask a clarifying question, request changes, or approve the PR if there are small remaining changes but the PR is otherwise good to go

On Merge:

If you have one commit and message, squash. If you need each message to be applied, rebase and merge.

@jaredcwhite jaredcwhite added the wip This PR is not ready for review, do not review it's a “Work In Progress” label Oct 12, 2023
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 12, 2023

Deploy Preview for bloom-demo-public ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 7808d2b
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/bloom-demo-public/deploys/656698766a60650008f06981
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-3677--bloom-demo-public.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

@accesslint accesslint bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are accessibility issues in these changes.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 12, 2023

Deploy Preview for bloom-partners-listings-approval failed.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 541cf2e
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/bloom-partners-listings-approval/deploys/65276e46b47d790008cc675e

@jaredcwhite jaredcwhite added 2 reviews needed Requires 2 more review before ready to merge and removed wip This PR is not ready for review, do not review it's a “Work In Progress” labels Nov 10, 2023
@jaredcwhite jaredcwhite changed the title 3595/button uptake (WIP) feat: seeds button uptake Nov 14, 2023
@ludtkemorgan
Copy link
Collaborator

@jaredcwhite one way we can solve the "jest-shared-helpers" failing test is to change the tsconfig.json in the shared-helpers to have this line "noImplicitReturns": false,. But that might have a bigger impact than just fixing it in seeds

Copy link
Collaborator

@ludtkemorgan ludtkemorgan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issues found so far, but two notes:

  • There is at least one usage of the ui-components button in a test file - StatusBar.test.tsx
  • The failing cypress tests appear to be failing because the TextArea component is unable to be typed in by Cypress. Don't know why that would be happening with your changes. I'll continue to investigate it today

Copy link
Collaborator

@ludtkemorgan ludtkemorgan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me so I'm approving it. The error that is happening for the textarea is because apparently it is partially covered by the save button. But I don't know why cypress thinks that. Here is the error:

image

I am able to get past this by changing the type step to this. But we should probably look into why Cypress thinks the button is covering the textarea

    cy.getByTestId("preference-description").type("Preference Description", {
      force: true,
    })

@ludtkemorgan ludtkemorgan added 1 review needed Requires 1 more review before ready to merge and removed 2 reviews needed Requires 2 more review before ready to merge labels Nov 16, 2023
@jaredcwhite
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks @ludtkemorgan for looking into that! Weird stuff. We'll have to keep an eye on it.

@jaredcwhite
Copy link
Collaborator Author

one way we can solve the "jest-shared-helpers" failing test is to change the tsconfig.json in the shared-helpers to have this line "noImplicitReturns": false,. But that might have a bigger impact than just fixing it in seeds

Hmm, yeah we might just have to see if we can patch that in Seeds directly.

@emilyjablonski
Copy link
Collaborator

@jaredcwhite Any luck on the tests here?

@jaredcwhite
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@emilyjablonski I haven't spent any more time on it. Still stumped. 🤷🏻‍♂️

@jaredcwhite
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Success! I was able to fix the issues with the Cypress partners tests (and also unit tests). The one remaining failing test was the issue we already identified which requires a fix in Seeds. (The other backend failure seems to be a fluke…a previous test run was successful.)

@jaredcwhite jaredcwhite merged commit bf944b3 into main Nov 29, 2023
21 of 24 checks passed
@jaredcwhite jaredcwhite deleted the 3595/button-uptake branch November 29, 2023 20:28
ludtkemorgan added a commit to housingbayarea/bloom that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2024
ludtkemorgan added a commit to housingbayarea/bloom that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2024
* feat: seeds button uptake (bloom-housing#3677)

* fix: validate radius geocoding preferences (bloom-housing#3718)

* fix: validate radius geocoding preferences

* fix: move to more generic

* fix: add test

* fix: one more test

* fix: change to true/false

* feat: add address verification for preferences step (bloom-housing#3715)

* feat: add collectAddress checkbox with subfields

* test: update preference tests

* fix: add minimum value validation for radius field

* fix: make collect address not required

* fix: expand collect address fields

* fix: change fields order in PreferenceDrawer

* feat: add address holder fields to application

* fix: make added field optional

* fix: display errors properly

* feat: add address holder fields to application summary

* feat: add address verification for preferences step

* feat: adjust padding for application summary

* fix: move address holder name and relationship fields to extraData

* fix: remove redundant backend address holder fields

* fix: use enum for address holder fields

* fix: add alternate address form component

* fix: remove redundant fields from new address form

* fix: verify preferences address when collectAddress true

* fix: block going back on address verification

add string to translation

* fix: use onClick to block address Verification back button

* fix: update dependencies for backend (bloom-housing#3694)

* feat: core changes for application style alignment (bloom-housing#3662)

* test: fix cypress lat long error (bloom-housing#3746)

* fix: padding issue on address verify (bloom-housing#3745)

* feat: add show mandated accounts flag (bloom-housing#3773)

* feat: mA-3752 feat: add SHOW_MANDATED_ACCOUNTS flag

* fix: add feature flag to bloom public next config

* fix: remove flag from partners

* feat: add address holder fields to paper application (bloom-housing#3716)

* feat: add collectAddress checkbox with subfields

* test: update preference tests

* fix: add minimum value validation for radius field

* fix: make collect address not required

* fix: expand collect address fields

* fix: change fields order in PreferenceDrawer

* feat: add address holder fields to application

* fix: make added field optional

* fix: display errors properly

* feat: add address holder fields to application summary

* feat: adjust padding for application summary

* feat: add address holder fields to paper application

* fix: use enum for address holder paper application fields

* fix: remove redundant backend fields

* fix: add correct labels, and values for extraData summary

* fix: export geocoding values enum from backend

* fix: display address as last extraData field

* fix: remove placeholders from form

* fix: set default values after listingDto fetched

* style: adjust details multiselect question

* feat: add geocoding preference label (bloom-housing#3765)

* feat: add additional fields info to add listing preferences

* feat: add additional fields column to table

* refactor: reuse additional field tag

* refactor: change base tag style

* fix: revert onClose drawer function

* fix: add geocoding fields to csv (bloom-housing#3778)

* fix: update seeds button (bloom-housing#3793)

* fix: add translations for geocoding (bloom-housing#3784)

* fix: add translations for geocoding

* fix: capitalize translation for qualifying address in vi.json

* fix: provides additional fields info text overflows (bloom-housing#3809)

* fix: provides additional fields info text overflows

* fix: check if length of links greater than 0

* refactor: remove console.log

* fix: add links to preference description (bloom-housing#3813)

* fix: seeds button layout fixes for Partners Application sidebar (bloom-housing#3789)

* feat: geocoding preference set up fixed layers (bloom-housing#3808)

* feat: add geocoding map layers to multiselect option

* fix: remove link from select description

* fix: default value for mapLayerId

* fix: add decorators for mapLayers dto's and entities

* fix: use smaller font for mapLayer select helper text

* fix: test fixes

* fix: add map layer geocoding checks (bloom-housing#3825)

* fix: add map layer geocoding checks

* fix: review comment fix

---------

Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Zięcina <kziecina@airnauts.com>
Co-authored-by: Emily Jablonski <65367387+emilyjablonski@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: cade-exygy <131277283+cade-exygy@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: ColinBuyck <53269332+ColinBuyck@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jared White <jared@jaredwhite.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1 review needed Requires 1 more review before ready to merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants