feat(client): add consensus address for debug cmd

[mmsqe]

Description

Closes: #XXXX

---

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

• included the correct type prefix in the PR title
• confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
• provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
• reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
• included the necessary unit and integration tests
• added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
• updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
• confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

• confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
• confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
• reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Enhanced the debug module to include consensus address decoding for improved debugging capabilities.

• Refactor

  • Improved error handling and expanded address decoding features in the debug command functionality.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent update to the cosmos-sdk focuses on enhancing the debug module by introducing support for consensus addresses in debugging commands. This update also includes improvements to the AddrCmd function in the client/debug/main.go file, such as integrating a new decoding function for consensus addresses, enhancing error handling, and expanding address decoding capabilities.

Changes

File	Change Summary
CHANGELOG.md client/debug/main.go	Added feature to include consensus address for the debug command in the debug module. Refactored AddrCmd to incorporate consensus address decoding and improve error handling.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 3

Out of diff range and nitpick comments (1)

CHANGELOG.md (1)

64-64: The changelog entry correctly links to the PR and succinctly describes the new feature. However, consider adding more detail about how this change impacts users or improves the debug command functionality.

Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c4308d2 and 83a1883.

Files selected for processing (2)

• CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
• client/debug/main.go (1 hunks)

Additional Context Used

Path-based Instructions (2)

client/debug/main.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

CHANGELOG.md (1)

Pattern **/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"

[coderabbitai]

Refactor error handling in AddrCmd to avoid ignoring errors.

- con, _ := clientCtx.ConsensusAddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
+ con, err := clientCtx.ConsensusAddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
+ if err != nil {
+     return fmt.Errorf("failed to convert consensus address: %w", err)
+ }

This change ensures that errors during the conversion of consensus addresses are not silently ignored, improving the robustness of the command.

---

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change

	decodeFns := []func(text string) ([]byte, error){
	hex.DecodeString,
	clientCtx.AddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	clientCtx.ValidatorAddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	clientCtx.ConsensusAddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	}
	errs := make([]any, 0, len(decodeFns))
	for _, fn := range decodeFns {
	if addr, err = fn(addrString); err == nil {
	break
	}
	errs = append(errs, err)
	}
	if len(errs) == len(decodeFns) {
	errTags := []string{
	"hex", "bech32 acc", "bech32 val", "bech32 con",
	}
	format := ""
	for i := range errs {
	if format != "" {
	format += ", "
	}
	format += errTags[i] + ": %w"
	}
	return fmt.Errorf("expected hex or bech32. Got errors: "+format, errs...)
	}
	acc, _ := clientCtx.AddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	val, _ := clientCtx.ValidatorAddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	con, _ := clientCtx.ConsensusAddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	cmd.Println("Address:", addr)
	cmd.Printf("Address (hex): %X\n", addr)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Acc: %s\n", acc)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Val: %s\n", val)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Con: %s\n", con)
	decodeFns := []func(text string) ([]byte, error){
	hex.DecodeString,
	clientCtx.AddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	clientCtx.ValidatorAddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	clientCtx.ConsensusAddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	}
	errs := make([]any, 0, len(decodeFns))
	for _, fn := range decodeFns {
	if addr, err = fn(addrString); err == nil {
	break
	}
	errs = append(errs, err)
	}
	if len(errs) == len(decodeFns) {
	errTags := []string{
	"hex", "bech32 acc", "bech32 val", "bech32 con",
	}
	format := ""
	for i := range errs {
	if format != "" {
	format += ", "
	}
	format += errTags[i] + ": %w"
	}
	return fmt.Errorf("expected hex or bech32. Got errors: "+format, errs...)
	}
	acc, _ := clientCtx.AddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	val, _ := clientCtx.ValidatorAddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	con, err := clientCtx.ConsensusAddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	if err != nil {
	return fmt.Errorf("failed to convert consensus address: %w", err)
	}
	cmd.Println("Address:", addr)
	cmd.Printf("Address (hex): %X\n", addr)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Acc: %s\n", acc)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Val: %s\n", val)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Con: %s\n", con)

---

Consider using a switch-case for address decoding in AddrCmd.

- for _, fn := range decodeFns {
-     if addr, err = fn(addrString); err == nil {
-         break
-     }
-     errs = append(errs, err)
- }
+ for _, fn := range decodeFns {
+     addr, err = fn(addrString)
+     if err == nil {
+         break
+     }
+     errs = append(errs, err)
+ }

Using a switch-case can make the code cleaner and more readable by explicitly handling each decoding function, and it aligns better with the Uber Golang style guide which favors readability and explicit error handling.

---

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change

	decodeFns := []func(text string) ([]byte, error){
	hex.DecodeString,
	clientCtx.AddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	clientCtx.ValidatorAddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	clientCtx.ConsensusAddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	}
	errs := make([]any, 0, len(decodeFns))
	for _, fn := range decodeFns {
	if addr, err = fn(addrString); err == nil {
	break
	}
	errs = append(errs, err)
	}
	if len(errs) == len(decodeFns) {
	errTags := []string{
	"hex", "bech32 acc", "bech32 val", "bech32 con",
	}
	format := ""
	for i := range errs {
	if format != "" {
	format += ", "
	}
	format += errTags[i] + ": %w"
	}
	return fmt.Errorf("expected hex or bech32. Got errors: "+format, errs...)
	}
	acc, _ := clientCtx.AddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	val, _ := clientCtx.ValidatorAddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	con, _ := clientCtx.ConsensusAddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	cmd.Println("Address:", addr)
	cmd.Printf("Address (hex): %X\n", addr)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Acc: %s\n", acc)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Val: %s\n", val)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Con: %s\n", con)
	decodeFns := []func(text string) ([]byte, error){
	hex.DecodeString,
	clientCtx.AddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	clientCtx.ValidatorAddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	clientCtx.ConsensusAddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	}
	errs := make([]any, 0, len(decodeFns))
	for _, fn := range decodeFns {
	addr, err = fn(addrString)
	if err == nil {
	break
	}
	errs = append(errs, err)
	}
	if len(errs) == len(decodeFns) {
	errTags := []string{
	"hex", "bech32 acc", "bech32 val", "bech32 con",
	}
	format := ""
	for i := range errs {
	if format != "" {
	format += ", "
	}
	format += errTags[i] + ": %w"
	}
	return fmt.Errorf("expected hex or bech32. Got errors: "+format, errs...)
	}
	acc, _ := clientCtx.AddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	val, _ := clientCtx.ValidatorAddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	con, _ := clientCtx.ConsensusAddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	cmd.Println("Address:", addr)
	cmd.Printf("Address (hex): %X\n", addr)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Acc: %s\n", acc)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Val: %s\n", val)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Con: %s\n", con)

---

Optimize error formatting in AddrCmd.

- format += errTags[i] + ": %w"
+ format += fmt.Sprintf("%s: %%w", errTags[i])

This change ensures that the error tags are correctly formatted into the error string, improving the clarity of error messages.

---

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change

	decodeFns := []func(text string) ([]byte, error){
	hex.DecodeString,
	clientCtx.AddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	clientCtx.ValidatorAddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	clientCtx.ConsensusAddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	}
	errs := make([]any, 0, len(decodeFns))
	for _, fn := range decodeFns {
	if addr, err = fn(addrString); err == nil {
	break
	}
	errs = append(errs, err)
	}
	if len(errs) == len(decodeFns) {
	errTags := []string{
	"hex", "bech32 acc", "bech32 val", "bech32 con",
	}
	format := ""
	for i := range errs {
	if format != "" {
	format += ", "
	}
	format += errTags[i] + ": %w"
	}
	return fmt.Errorf("expected hex or bech32. Got errors: "+format, errs...)
	}
	acc, _ := clientCtx.AddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	val, _ := clientCtx.ValidatorAddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	con, _ := clientCtx.ConsensusAddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	cmd.Println("Address:", addr)
	cmd.Printf("Address (hex): %X\n", addr)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Acc: %s\n", acc)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Val: %s\n", val)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Con: %s\n", con)
	decodeFns := []func(text string) ([]byte, error){
	hex.DecodeString,
	clientCtx.AddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	clientCtx.ValidatorAddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	clientCtx.ConsensusAddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	}
	errs := make([]any, 0, len(decodeFns))
	for _, fn := range decodeFns {
	if addr, err = fn(addrString); err == nil {
	break
	}
	errs = append(errs, err)
	}
	if len(errs) == len(decodeFns) {
	errTags := []string{
	"hex", "bech32 acc", "bech32 val", "bech32 con",
	}
	format := ""
	for i := range errs {
	if format != "" {
	format += ", "
	}
	format += fmt.Sprintf("%s: %%w", errTags[i])
	}
	return fmt.Errorf("expected hex or bech32. Got errors: "+format, errs...)
	}
	acc, _ := clientCtx.AddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	val, _ := clientCtx.ValidatorAddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	con, _ := clientCtx.ConsensusAddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	cmd.Println("Address:", addr)
	cmd.Printf("Address (hex): %X\n", addr)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Acc: %s\n", acc)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Val: %s\n", val)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Con: %s\n", con)

[hieuvubk]

overall LGTM. Add few comment may simplify code.

[hieuvubk]

I think we should return err directly here instead of loop because we assume the array has 4 elements anyway. St like
fmt.Errorf("expected hex or bech32. Got errors: hex: %w, bech32 acc: %w, bech32 val: %w", bech32 cons: %w", errs[0], errs[1], errs[2], errs[3])

[mmsqe]

I was try to avoid that way.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 83a1883 and 5e2b905.

Files selected for processing (1)

• client/debug/main.go (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• client/debug/main.go

[julienrbrt]

seems like there are some build failures

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 3

Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5e2b905 and 92ed746.

Files selected for processing (1)

• client/debug/main.go (1 hunks)

Additional Context Used

GitHub Check Runs (1)

dependency-review failure (10)

client/debug/main.go: [failure] 269-269:
missing ',' in argument list

---

client/debug/main.go: [failure] 269-269:
expected operand, found ','

---

client/debug/main.go: [failure] 270-270:
missing ',' in argument list

---

client/debug/main.go: [failure] 270-270:
missing ',' in argument list

---

client/debug/main.go: [failure] 270-270:
expected operand, found 'range'

---

client/debug/main.go: [failure] 271-271:
missing ',' in argument list

---

client/debug/main.go: [failure] 271-271:
expected '==', found '='

---

client/debug/main.go: [failure] 271-271:
missing ',' in argument list

---

client/debug/main.go: [failure] 272-272:
expected operand, found 'break'

---

client/debug/main.go: [failure] 272-272:
missing ',' in composite literal

Path-based Instructions (1)

client/debug/main.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

[coderabbitai]

Refactor error handling in AddrCmd to avoid ignoring errors.

- con, _ := clientCtx.ConsensusAddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
+ con, err := clientCtx.ConsensusAddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
+ if err != nil {
+     return fmt.Errorf("failed to convert consensus address: %w", err)
+ }

This change ensures that errors during the conversion of consensus addresses are not silently ignored, improving the robustness of the command.

---

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change

	decodeFns := []func(text string) ([]byte, error){
	hex.DecodeString,
	clientCtx.AddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	clientCtx.ValidatorAddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	clientCtx.ConsensusAddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	}
	errs := make([]any 0, len(decodeFns))
	for _, fn := range decodeFns {
	if addr, err = fn(addrString); err == nil {
	break
	}
	errs = append(errs, err)
	}
	if len(errs) == len(decodeFns) {
	errTags := []string{
	"hex", "bech32 acc", "bech32 val", "bech32 con",
	}
	format := ""
	for i := range errs {
	if format != "" {
	format += ", "
	}
	format += errTags[i] + ": %w"
	}
	return fmt.Errorf("expected hex or bech32. Got errors: "+format, errs...)
	}
	acc, _ := clientCtx.AddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	val, _ := clientCtx.ValidatorAddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	con, _ := clientCtx.ConsensusAddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	cmd.Println("Address:", addr)
	cmd.Printf("Address (hex): %X\n", addr)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Acc: %s\n", acc)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Val: %s\n", val)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Con: %s\n", con)
	decodeFns := []func(text string) ([]byte, error){
	hex.DecodeString,
	clientCtx.AddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	clientCtx.ValidatorAddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	clientCtx.ConsensusAddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	}
	errs := make([]any 0, len(decodeFns))
	for _, fn := range decodeFns {
	if addr, err = fn(addrString); err == nil {
	break
	}
	errs = append(errs, err)
	}
	if len(errs) == len(decodeFns) {
	errTags := []string{
	"hex", "bech32 acc", "bech32 val", "bech32 con",
	}
	format := ""
	for i := range errs {
	if format != "" {
	format += ", "
	}
	format += errTags[i] + ": %w"
	}
	return fmt.Errorf("expected hex or bech32. Got errors: "+format, errs...)
	}
	acc, _ := clientCtx.AddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	val, _ := clientCtx.ValidatorAddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	con, err := clientCtx.ConsensusAddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	if err != nil {
	return fmt.Errorf("failed to convert consensus address: %w", err)
	}
	cmd.Println("Address:", addr)
	cmd.Printf("Address (hex): %X\n", addr)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Acc: %s\n", acc)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Val: %s\n", val)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Con: %s\n", con)

---

Consider using a switch-case for address decoding in AddrCmd.

- for _, fn := range decodeFns {
-     if addr, err = fn(addrString); err == nil {
-         break
-     }
-     errs = append(errs, err)
- }
+ for _, fn := range decodeFns {
+     addr, err = fn(addrString)
+     if err == nil {
+         break
+     }
+     errs = append(errs, err)
+ }

Using a switch-case can make the code cleaner and more readable by explicitly handling each decoding function, and it aligns better with the Uber Golang style guide which favors readability and explicit error handling.

---

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change

	decodeFns := []func(text string) ([]byte, error){
	hex.DecodeString,
	clientCtx.AddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	clientCtx.ValidatorAddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	clientCtx.ConsensusAddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	}
	errs := make([]any 0, len(decodeFns))
	for _, fn := range decodeFns {
	if addr, err = fn(addrString); err == nil {
	break
	}
	errs = append(errs, err)
	}
	if len(errs) == len(decodeFns) {
	errTags := []string{
	"hex", "bech32 acc", "bech32 val", "bech32 con",
	}
	format := ""
	for i := range errs {
	if format != "" {
	format += ", "
	}
	format += errTags[i] + ": %w"
	}
	return fmt.Errorf("expected hex or bech32. Got errors: "+format, errs...)
	}
	acc, _ := clientCtx.AddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	val, _ := clientCtx.ValidatorAddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	con, _ := clientCtx.ConsensusAddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	cmd.Println("Address:", addr)
	cmd.Printf("Address (hex): %X\n", addr)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Acc: %s\n", acc)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Val: %s\n", val)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Con: %s\n", con)
	decodeFns := []func(text string) ([]byte, error){
	hex.DecodeString,
	clientCtx.AddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	clientCtx.ValidatorAddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	clientCtx.ConsensusAddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	}
	errs := make([]any 0, len(decodeFns))
	for _, fn := range decodeFns {
	addr, err = fn(addrString)
	if err == nil {
	break
	}
	errs = append(errs, err)
	}
	if len(errs) == len(decodeFns) {
	errTags := []string{
	"hex", "bech32 acc", "bech32 val", "bech32 con",
	}
	format := ""
	for i := range errs {
	if format != "" {
	format += ", "
	}
	format += errTags[i] + ": %w"
	}
	return fmt.Errorf("expected hex or bech32. Got errors: "+format, errs...)
	}
	acc, _ := clientCtx.AddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	val, _ := clientCtx.ValidatorAddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	con, _ := clientCtx.ConsensusAddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	cmd.Println("Address:", addr)
	cmd.Printf("Address (hex): %X\n", addr)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Acc: %s\n", acc)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Val: %s\n", val)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Con: %s\n", con)

---

Optimize error formatting in AddrCmd.

- format += errTags[i] + ": %w"
+ format += fmt.Sprintf("%s: %%w", errTags[i])

This change ensures that the error tags are correctly formatted into the error string, improving the clarity of error messages.

---

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change

	decodeFns := []func(text string) ([]byte, error){
	hex.DecodeString,
	clientCtx.AddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	clientCtx.ValidatorAddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	clientCtx.ConsensusAddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	}
	errs := make([]any 0, len(decodeFns))
	for _, fn := range decodeFns {
	if addr, err = fn(addrString); err == nil {
	break
	}
	errs = append(errs, err)
	}
	if len(errs) == len(decodeFns) {
	errTags := []string{
	"hex", "bech32 acc", "bech32 val", "bech32 con",
	}
	format := ""
	for i := range errs {
	if format != "" {
	format += ", "
	}
	format += errTags[i] + ": %w"
	}
	return fmt.Errorf("expected hex or bech32. Got errors: "+format, errs...)
	}
	acc, _ := clientCtx.AddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	val, _ := clientCtx.ValidatorAddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	con, _ := clientCtx.ConsensusAddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	cmd.Println("Address:", addr)
	cmd.Printf("Address (hex): %X\n", addr)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Acc: %s\n", acc)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Val: %s\n", val)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Con: %s\n", con)
	decodeFns := []func(text string) ([]byte, error){
	hex.DecodeString,
	clientCtx.AddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	clientCtx.ValidatorAddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	clientCtx.ConsensusAddressCodec.StringToBytes,
	}
	errs := make([]any 0, len(decodeFns))
	for _, fn := range decodeFns {
	if addr, err = fn(addrString); err == nil {
	break
	}
	errs = append(errs, err)
	}
	if len(errs) == len(decodeFns) {
	errTags := []string{
	"hex", "bech32 acc", "bech32 val", "bech32 con",
	}
	format := ""
	for i := range errs {
	if format != "" {
	format += ", "
	}
	format += fmt.Sprintf("%s: %%w", errTags[i])
	}
	return fmt.Errorf("expected hex or bech32. Got errors: "+format, errs...)
	}
	acc, _ := clientCtx.AddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	val, _ := clientCtx.ValidatorAddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	con, _ := clientCtx.ConsensusAddressCodec.BytesToString(addr)
	cmd.Println("Address:", addr)
	cmd.Printf("Address (hex): %X\n", addr)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Acc: %s\n", acc)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Val: %s\n", val)
	cmd.Printf("Bech32 Con: %s\n", con)

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 92ed746 and 710214f.

Files selected for processing (1)

• CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)

Additional Context Used

Path-based Instructions (1)

CHANGELOG.md (1)

Pattern **/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"

Additional comments not posted (1)

CHANGELOG.md (1)

64-64: The changelog entry clearly describes the addition made by PR #20328. Good job maintaining clarity and conciseness.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 710214f and af2b1e7.

Files selected for processing (2)

• CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
• client/debug/main.go (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• client/debug/main.go

Additional Context Used

Path-based Instructions (1)

CHANGELOG.md (1)

Pattern **/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"

Additional comments not posted (1)

CHANGELOG.md (1)

64-64: The changelog entry correctly links to the PR and describes the new feature added. Ensure that the description is clear and matches the actual implementation in the code.