Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor imagediff and fix regression bug #30694

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 25, 2024

Conversation

wxiaoguang
Copy link
Contributor

Fix #30683
Regression of #30140

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Apr 25, 2024
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 25, 2024
@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang added type/bug skip-changelog This PR is irrelevant for the (next) changelog, for example bug fixes for unreleased features. labels Apr 25, 2024
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Apr 25, 2024
@silverwind
Copy link
Member

Where exactly was the bug?

@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Apr 25, 2024

Where exactly was the bug?

#30683 (comment)

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
@wxiaoguang
Copy link
Contributor Author

Where exactly was the bug?

In the issue's screenshot #30683 (comment)

image

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Apr 25, 2024
@silverwind
Copy link
Member

silverwind commented Apr 25, 2024

So the bug was basically a missed check if a queried element existed?

@wxiaoguang
Copy link
Contributor Author

So the bug was basically a missed check if a queried element existed?

I think so.

@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang merged commit fd63b96 into go-gitea:main Apr 25, 2024
26 checks passed
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added this to the 1.23.0 milestone Apr 25, 2024
@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang deleted the fix-image-diff branch April 25, 2024 13:01
zjjhot added a commit to zjjhot/gitea that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2024
* giteaofficial/main:
  Deduplicate lfs common code (go-gitea#30704)
  Improve job commit description (go-gitea#30579)
  Improve test for TestPullCompare (go-gitea#30699)
  Allow to save empty comment (go-gitea#30706)
  [skip ci] Updated translations via Crowdin
  Refactor imagediff and fix regression bug (go-gitea#30694)
  Improve oauth2 client "preferred username field" logic and the error handling (go-gitea#30622)
  Fix active item in tab menu (go-gitea#30690)
@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang removed this from the 1.23.0 milestone Apr 27, 2024
@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang added this to the 1.22.0 milestone Apr 27, 2024
@go-gitea go-gitea locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 25, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. modifies/js size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. skip-changelog This PR is irrelevant for the (next) changelog, for example bug fixes for unreleased features. type/bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

New pull request imagediff js error
4 participants