-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FanzyZone][FZ Editor] Layout hotkeys / quick swap #1411
Comments
amen. +1 |
did not see a vote button but +1 :) |
thumbs up it :) click on the smile face at the top |
@martinandersen3d @dparlevliet @wookiesh Hey everyone, I'm currently working on a feature to implement Hotkeys to quickly switch between FancyZones custom layouts, and would love to get your feedback! If you're interested, please fill out this form. Feedback from anyone else who would need such a feature is welcome as well. |
I have the "non-primary mouse button" as my preferred method for FancyZone activation. Using the scroll wheel to cycle through a predefined list of layouts is what I would find the most intuitive. Hotkeys are fine, but I think a cycle is more efficient when having many layouts Thanks for the amazing job on this so far! |
@typpos |
This has been resolved in the 0.35 release. https://github.com/microsoft/PowerToys/releases/latest |
Thank you so much for the work on this feature! As happy as I am to have a keyboard shortcut to swap layouts, a 5-button combination is only useful in a few situations. I think it would be really nice if, while holding shift and dragging a window to drop into a zone, I could press the ~ key to quickly swap between layouts I have assigned a number. |
The 1 is a drop down menu. |
I get that, but I still have to use Win + Ctrl + Alt + Whatever I choose in the dropdown. My question was whether you can set your own shortcut. |
Currently no, they are preset |
I just started using FancyZones recently and am missing the option to quickly cycle through the different layouts. This proposed solution would be absolutely ideal in my opinion and would be a huge improvement to the tool. Judging by the number of likes I assume I am not the only one who feels this way. Since this issue is closed, what would be the best way to bring this back on the agenda and hopefully get it implemented? Open a new issue and reference the post? |
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: