Skip to content

Web conference notes, 2020.05.21 (Provider Services wg)

Matt Davis edited this page May 26, 2020 · 16 revisions

Web conference notes, 2020.05.21 (Provider Services wg)

Meeting ID: 627 957 166

One tap mobile:

  • +16699006833,,627957166# US (San Jose)
  • +19294362866,,627957166# US (New York)

Dial by your location:

  • +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)
  • +1 929 436 2866 US (New York)

Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/aeJWJsuC2b

Attendees

add your name at beginning or end of call

Agenda

Provider Services Working Group Updates

  • Current Charter
    • OMF will be creating Steering Committee mentioned in part 7
    • OMF writing up roles and descriptions/responsibilities

Discussion

Minutes

  • Michael and Jascha will write up roles & responsibilities for WG steering committees and submit to board
  • Kegan leaving Santa Monica and stepping down as chair
  • Michael S will be interim chair
  • 0.4.1 was released on Friday with board approval
  • Reviewed timeline for 1.0. Big components are docks and reconciliation.
  • Webinar for reconciliation Wed 27 May
  • Dock discussion doesn’t feel sufficiently baked/resolved to Kegan
  • Jascha had follow-up with the GBFS people to increase spec alignment, working on a draft of a position-paper outlining a high-level approach that allows for both sharing of ideas but also recognizes differences in requirements, release cycles, and governing bodies.
  • Metrics API is also candidate for 1.0 because it may be something that Providers implement as well, although it was originally framed as a City Services interface. Maybe mark beta?
  • Other City Services APIs are proposed for 1.0, including Jurisdiction and Audit. If you’re interested, please attend the CS WG. Comments and feedback will help prioritize.
  • Discussed Jurisdiction spec in the context of describing “elsewhere”
  • Proposal to make telemetry optional, replaced with geography_id. Puts some additional compute burden on the providers, but has some nice privacy-protection. Can still ask for telemetry after a reasonable time-delay if that’s how the cities want to write their SLA. Probably will tag this “beta” while we test it out.
Clone this wiki locally