Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Update the required version of task. #567

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 11, 2024

Conversation

haiqi96
Copy link
Contributor

@haiqi96 haiqi96 commented Oct 29, 2024

Description

Update the require version of task. Also attaching a link for Task

Validation performed

Ensure the link works

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the requirements for the Task dependency to version >= 3.38.0 across multiple documentation files.
    • Added a new link to the Task documentation for user reference.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the documentation across multiple files to specify a minimum version requirement for the Task tool, changing the version constraint from >= 3.35 to >= 3.38.0. This change addresses compatibility issues related to bugs in earlier versions. Additionally, a link to the Task documentation has been added in relevant sections. No other structural or command-related changes were made.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/README.md Updated Task dependency version from >= 3.35 to >= 3.38.0; added link to Task documentation.
docs/src/dev-guide/building-package.md Updated Task requirement to >= 3.38.0.
docs/src/dev-guide/components-core/index.md Updated Task requirement to >= 3.38.0.
docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-linting.md Updated Task requirement to >= 3.38.0.

Possibly related PRs


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Member

@kirkrodrigues kirkrodrigues left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also update

  • docs/src/dev-guide/
    • building-package.md
    • contributing-linting.md
    • components-core/index.md

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-linting.md (1)

18-18: Consider adding context for the version requirement

The version requirement is clearly specified. However, it would be helpful to add a brief comment explaining why this specific version is required, especially since this appears to be an increase from a previous requirement.

-* [Task] >= 3.38.0
+* [Task] >= 3.38.0  # Required for improved error handling in parallel task execution
docs/src/dev-guide/building-package.md (1)

16-16: Consider adding a note about the version requirement rationale.

It would be helpful to briefly document why version 3.38.0 is specifically required. This helps future maintainers understand the constraints.

Consider adding a comment like:

-* [Task](https://taskfile.dev/) >= 3.38.0
+* [Task](https://taskfile.dev/) >= 3.38.0  # Required for <feature/bugfix>
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 10ed8f9 and 09a96f3.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • docs/src/dev-guide/building-package.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/src/dev-guide/components-core/index.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-linting.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-linting.md (1)

18-18: Verify the rationale for Task version 3.38.0

The version requirement has been updated to >= 3.38.0. Let's verify if this specific version is required for any particular features or bug fixes.

docs/src/dev-guide/building-package.md (1)

16-16: Documentation format looks good, but let's verify the version requirement.

The Task version requirement is clearly documented with a proper link to the official documentation. However, we should verify why version 3.38.0 specifically was chosen.

Let's verify the version requirement consistency across the documentation and check for any related Task issues:

✅ Verification successful

Let me verify the Task version requirements and their consistency across the codebase.


Task version requirement update is consistent and justified

The version requirement of Task >= 3.38.0 is consistently documented across all files:

  • docs/README.md
  • docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-linting.md
  • docs/src/dev-guide/building-package.md
  • docs/src/dev-guide/components-core/index.md

The project itself uses Task version 3, and the version bump to 3.38.0 aligns with the project's Task usage patterns seen in the Taskfile.yml. The documentation update ensures users have a version that supports all the Task features used in the project.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check Task version requirements across docs and find potential issues

# Check for Task version requirements across all documentation
echo "Checking Task version requirements across documentation:"
rg -p "Task.*>= *[0-9]" docs/

# Check if there are any Taskfile.yml files that might have version constraints
echo -e "\nChecking Taskfile version specifications:"
fd Taskfile.yml --exec cat {} \; 

Length of output: 22653


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for Task version specification in Taskfile.yml
echo "Checking Task version in Taskfile.yml:"
rg -p "version: \"[0-9]" Taskfile.yml

# Check for any Task-related changes in git history
echo -e "\nChecking recent Task-related changes:"
git log -p --grep="task" --grep="Task" -i -- "*.md" "Taskfile.yml" | head -n 50

Length of output: 2068

docs/src/dev-guide/components-core/index.md (1)

10-10: LGTM! Let's verify version consistency across docs.

The Task version requirement update to >= 3.38.0 is properly documented with the correct link.

Let's verify the version requirement is consistent across all documentation files:

✅ Verification successful

Task version requirement is consistent across documentation

The version requirement >= 3.38.0 is consistently specified in all documentation files:

  • docs/README.md
  • docs/src/dev-guide/components-core/index.md
  • docs/src/dev-guide/building-package.md
  • docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-linting.md
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check Task version requirements across documentation
# Expected: All files should specify version >= 3.38.0

echo "Checking Task version requirements in documentation files..."
rg -i "task.*[>≥]=.*3\." docs/

Length of output: 426

Copy link
Member

@kirkrodrigues kirkrodrigues left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

docs: Update the required version of task.

@haiqi96 haiqi96 changed the title package: Update required version for task docs: Update the required version of task. Nov 11, 2024
@haiqi96 haiqi96 merged commit f3b1cf6 into y-scope:main Nov 11, 2024
5 checks passed
LinZhihao-723 added a commit to LinZhihao-723/clp that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2024
* ffi: Add support for serializing/deserializing auto-generated and user-generated schema tree node IDs. (y-scope#557)

Co-authored-by: kirkrodrigues <2454684+kirkrodrigues@users.noreply.github.com>

* clp: Add missing C++ standard library includes in IR parsing files. (y-scope#561)

Co-authored-by: kirkrodrigues <2454684+kirkrodrigues@users.noreply.github.com>

* log-viewer-webui: Update `yscope-log-viewer` to the latest version (which uses `clp-ffi-js`). (y-scope#562)

* package: Upgrade dependencies to resolve security issues. (y-scope#536)

* clp-s: Implement table packing (y-scope#466)

Co-authored-by: wraymo <37269683+wraymo@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Kirk Rodrigues <2454684+kirkrodrigues@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: wraymo <raywangv@gmail.com>

* log-viewer-webui: Update `yscope-log-viewer` to the latest version. (y-scope#565)

* ci: Switch GitHub macOS build workflow to use macos-13 (x86) and macos-14 (ARM) runners. (y-scope#566)

* core: Add support for user-defined HTTP headers in `NetworkReader`. (y-scope#568)

Co-authored-by: Lin Zhihao <59785146+LinZhihao-723@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Xiaochong Wei <xiaochong.wei@yscope.com>

* chore: Update to the latest version of yscope-dev-utils. (y-scope#574)

* build(core): Upgrade msgpack to v7.0.0. (y-scope#575)

* feat(ffi): Update IR stream protocol version handling in preparation for releasing the kv-pair IR stream format: (y-scope#573)

- Bump the IR stream protocol version to 0.1.0 for the kv-pair IR stream format.
- Treat the previous IR stream format's versions as backwards compatible.
- Differentiate between backwards-compatible and supported versions during validation.

Co-authored-by: kirkrodrigues <2454684+kirkrodrigues@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(taskfiles): Trim trailing slash from URL prefix in `download-and-extract-tar` (fixes y-scope#577). (y-scope#578)

* fix(ffi): Correct `clp::ffi::ir_stream::Deserializer::deserialize_next_ir_unit`'s return value when failing to read the next IR unit's type tag. (y-scope#579)

* fix(taskfiles): Update `yscope-log-viewer` sources in `log-viewer-webui-clients` sources list (fixes y-scope#576). (y-scope#580)

* fix(cmake): Add Homebrew path detection for `mariadb-connector-c` to fix macOS build failure. (y-scope#582)

Co-authored-by: kirkrodrigues <2454684+kirkrodrigues@users.noreply.github.com>

* refactor(ffi): Make `get_schema_subtree_bitmap` a public method of `KeyValuePairLogEvent`. (y-scope#581)

* ci: Schedule GitHub workflows to daily run to detect failures due to upgraded dependencies or environments. (y-scope#583)

* docs: Update the required version of task. (y-scope#567)

* Add pr check workflow

---------

Co-authored-by: kirkrodrigues <2454684+kirkrodrigues@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Junhao Liao <junhao.liao@yscope.com>
Co-authored-by: Henry8192 <50559854+Henry8192@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Devin Gibson <gibber9809@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: wraymo <37269683+wraymo@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: wraymo <raywangv@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Xiaochong(Eddy) Wei <40865608+anlowee@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Xiaochong Wei <xiaochong.wei@yscope.com>
Co-authored-by: haiqi96 <14502009+haiqi96@users.noreply.github.com>
jackluo923 pushed a commit to jackluo923/clp that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2024
@haiqi96 haiqi96 deleted the task_version_update branch December 6, 2024 20:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants