Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge v1.1.0 changes to master #1062

Merged
merged 44 commits into from
Nov 9, 2023
Merged

Merge v1.1.0 changes to master #1062

merged 44 commits into from
Nov 9, 2023

Conversation

0xsharma
Copy link
Contributor

Description

In this PR, we merge the v1.1.0 changes to master.

manav2401 and others added 11 commits October 20, 2023 15:22
* eth: handle nil blocks and state when pending is not available

* internal/ethapi: handle nil state and err in send condtional tx api
bor: make withdrawal objects nil
* Retire calculateBorConfigHelper in favour of borKeyValueConfigHelper

* Use borKeyValueConfigHelper for CalculateBurntContract

* Numerical instead of lexicographic sorting of config keys

* Add test for burntContract

* fix lint

---------

Co-authored-by: marcello33 <marcelloardizzone@hotmail.it>
Co-authored-by: Manav Darji <manavdarji.india@gmail.com>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 31, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 68 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Files Coverage Δ
core/state/statedb.go 61.12% <ø> (ø)
core/state_transition.go 88.77% <ø> (ø)
core/txpool/txpool.go 77.63% <100.00%> (-0.82%) ⬇️
core/vm/evm.go 32.22% <100.00%> (-0.23%) ⬇️
core/vm/interpreter.go 29.08% <ø> (ø)
core/vm/jump_table.go 99.58% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
eth/catalyst/api.go 0.00% <ø> (-61.69%) ⬇️
internal/cli/server/config.go 67.98% <100.00%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
internal/cli/server/flags.go 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
light/txpool.go 43.02% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 14 more

... and 31 files with indirect coverage changes

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!.

@manav2401 manav2401 merged commit c66862a into master Nov 9, 2023
22 of 24 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants