Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 24, 2023. It is now read-only.

test: improve unit test coverage for v2.0 GA #998

Open
35 of 67 tasks
GMHDBJD opened this issue Sep 7, 2020 · 2 comments
Open
35 of 67 tasks

test: improve unit test coverage for v2.0 GA #998

GMHDBJD opened this issue Sep 7, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
type/test Changes related to test cases

Comments

@GMHDBJD
Copy link
Collaborator

GMHDBJD commented Sep 7, 2020 •
edited by lance6716
Loading

Feature Request

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe:

improve unit test coverage
Describe alternatives you've considered:

  • github.com/pingcap/dm/checker 0.209s coverage: 4.4% of statements, gmhdbjd
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/debug-tools/binlog-event-blackhole [no test files]
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/dm/command [no test files], lance6716
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/dm/common 0.126s coverage: 65.6% of statements, gmhdbjd
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/dm/config 0.478s coverage: 61.8% of statements, lance6716
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/dm/ctl [no test files]
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/dm/ctl/common [no test files]
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/dm/ctl/master 0.186s coverage: 3.4% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/dm/master 72.952s coverage: 61.4% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/dm/master/shardddl 82.999s coverage: 80.4% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/dm/master/workerrpc [no test files], csuzhangxc
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/dm/portal 0.260s coverage: 69.1% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/dm/portal/statik [no test files]
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/dm/tracer 0.215s coverage: 71.0% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/dm/unit 0.144s coverage: 0.0% of statements [no tests to run], gmhdbjd
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/dm/worker 42.585s coverage: 76.9% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/dumpling 0.216s coverage: 52.4% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/loader 4.170s coverage: 26.7% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/mydumper 0.149s coverage: 39.5% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/atomic2 0.085s coverage: 100.0% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/backoff 0.098s coverage: 100.0% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/binlog 0.158s coverage: 78.6% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/binlog/common 0.111s coverage: 41.7% of statements, gmhdbjd
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/binlog/event 0.194s coverage: 79.5% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/binlog/reader 17.176s coverage: 84.9% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/binlog/writer 0.188s coverage: 85.2% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/conn 0.096s coverage: 57.5% of statements, lance6716
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/context [no test files]
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/cputil [no test files]
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/dumpling 0.132s coverage: 80.0% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/election 10.972s coverage: 85.0% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/encrypt 0.140s coverage: 91.2% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/etcdutil 16.516s coverage: 17.1% of statements, csuzhangxc
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/func-rollback 0.100s coverage: 100.0% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/gtid 0.119s coverage: 86.9% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/ha 26.832s coverage: 80.5% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/helper 0.123s coverage: 100.0% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/log 0.116s coverage: 23.1% of statements, gmhdbjd
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/metricsproxy 0.058s coverage: 100.0% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/parser 0.132s coverage: 87.4% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/retry 7.100s coverage: 81.2% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/schema 22.046s coverage: 82.1% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/shardddl/optimism 15.002s coverage: 84.8% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/shardddl/pessimism 4.643s coverage: 80.8% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/streamer 12.567s coverage: 90.5% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/terror 0.128s coverage: 98.1% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/tracing 0.104s coverage: 69.2% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/upgrade 2.628s coverage: 84.0% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/utils 0.233s coverage: 28.0% of statements, csuzhangxc
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/v1dbschema 3.094s coverage: 71.6% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/pkg/v1workermeta 2.644s coverage: 85.4% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/relay 8.409s coverage: 59.4% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/relay/common 0.104s coverage: 90.0% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/relay/purger 8.100s coverage: 79.5% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/relay/reader 0.111s coverage: 100.0% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/relay/retry 5.156s coverage: 94.4% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/relay/transformer 0.091s coverage: 100.0% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/relay/writer 18.701s coverage: 89.4% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/syncer 41.871s coverage: 44.4% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/syncer/err-operator 0.090s coverage: 85.1% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/syncer/safe-mode 0.065s coverage: 82.4% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/syncer/shardddl 3.636s coverage: 91.3% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/syncer/sharding-meta 0.100s coverage: 94.4% of statements
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/syncer/checkpoint.go 71.6%, lance6716
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/syncer/error.go 47.6%, lance6716
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/syncer/sharding_group.go 13.5% lance6716
  • github.com/pingcap/dm/syncer/ddl.go 36% lance6716
@GMHDBJD GMHDBJD added the type/test Changes related to test cases label Sep 7, 2020
@GMHDBJD GMHDBJD mentioned this issue Sep 7, 2020
Merged
This was referenced Sep 9, 2020
Merged
Merged
@GMHDBJD GMHDBJD changed the title test: import unit test coverage test: improve unit test coverage Sep 9, 2020
@GMHDBJD GMHDBJD mentioned this issue Sep 9, 2020
Merged
This was referenced Sep 9, 2020
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
@GMHDBJD GMHDBJD mentioned this issue Sep 10, 2020
Merged
@ti-srebot ti-srebot mentioned this issue Sep 10, 2020
Merged
@csuzhangxc csuzhangxc mentioned this issue Sep 14, 2020
Merged
@ti-srebot ti-srebot mentioned this issue Sep 15, 2020
Merged
@csuzhangxc csuzhangxc changed the title test: improve unit test coverage test: improve unit test coverage for v2.0 GA Sep 16, 2020
@lance6716

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@csuzhangxc csuzhangxc mentioned this issue Sep 16, 2020
Merged
@lance6716 lance6716 mentioned this issue Sep 16, 2020
Merged
This was referenced Sep 17, 2020
Merged
Merged
@csuzhangxc csuzhangxc mentioned this issue Sep 17, 2020
Merged
@lance6716 lance6716 mentioned this issue Sep 18, 2020
Merged
@GMHDBJD GMHDBJD mentioned this issue Sep 21, 2020
Merged
@ti-srebot ti-srebot mentioned this issue Sep 21, 2020
Merged
@lance6716 lance6716 mentioned this issue Sep 21, 2020
Merged
This was referenced Sep 22, 2020
Merged
Merged
Merged
@lance6716 lance6716 mentioned this issue Sep 27, 2020
Merged
@GMHDBJD GMHDBJD mentioned this issue Sep 28, 2020
Merged
@lance6716
Copy link
Collaborator

coverage under syncer after #1109

image

@ti-srebot ti-srebot mentioned this issue Sep 30, 2020
Merged
@ti-srebot ti-srebot mentioned this issue Oct 9, 2020
Merged
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
type/test Changes related to test cases
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@lance6716 @GMHDBJD