-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve and simplify configure.ac checks #89886
Comments
The autoconf-based build system has room for improvements. The configure.ac script can be simplified in several places by using AS and AC macros or by defining new custom macros. For example we have a lot of blocks that look like this: AC_MSG_CHECKING(for chroot)
AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([[#include <unistd.h>]], [[void x=chroot]])],
[AC_DEFINE(HAVE_CHROOT, 1, Define if you have the 'chroot' function.)
AC_MSG_RESULT(yes)],
[AC_MSG_RESULT(no)
]) The block has an issue, too. It does not use AC_CACHE to cache the result. The entire block can be replaced by a custom macro that takes care of everything and implements correct caching: PY_CHECK_FUNC([chroot], [#include <unistd.h>]) We can also move several library and header checks from setup.py into configure.ac, e.g. check for soundcard.h or gdbm libs and headers. |
The first PR adds helper macros, AC_CACHE_CHECK() [1] and AS_VAR_IF() [2]. It also unified internal variables to use format "ac_cv_func_$funcname", "ac_cv_func_lib_$library_$funcname", or "ac_cv_header_$headername_h". "ac_cv" stands for autoconf cached value. AC_CACHE_CHECK() replaces AC_MSG_CHECKING() and AC_MSG_RESULT(). The syntax is AC_CACHE_CHECK([text], [cache variable], [body]) where body is only excecuted when the cache variable is not set. The body has to set the cache variable to yes or no. Any output and AC_DEFINE must occur outside the body. AS_VAR_IF() is a nicer way to write if test $variable = value; then; fi. [1] https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/autoconf-2.69/html_node/Caching-Results.html#Caching-Results |
#73627 introduces forward compatibility issues with autoconf 2.71. I took the output of autoupdate and resolved all warnings. |
AC_CHECK_TYPE is obsolete and it's use is discouraged. There are some gotchas we need to check before switching to AC_CHECK_TYPES. See: |
In the conversion to PY_CHECK_FUNC, there's a mistake in HAVE_EPOLL. Python 3.10.1 defines HAVE_EPOLL by checking for the The effect is that |
Thanks William! |
autoconf bumping to 2.71+ is a little annoying because LTS ubuntu 20.04 only ships with should this have landed in 3.12 which is already in beta freeze? I'm building this for deadsnakes and it'd kind of suck to not ship 3.12 for ubuntu 20.04 especially when 3.12b1 built cleanly |
Perhaps you are misunderstanding something. The generated IOW: You don't need GNU Autoconf at all for a clean build. |
part of debian packaging is to regenerate configure |
They can still do that with autoconf 2.69. There is no hard requirement to use 2.71. We only require 2.71 for CPython development. Debian should be all ok with 2.69. |
the sources were updated to require 2.71 in #105207 |
For CPython development, yes. |
Ah, there's a requirement check in the configure.ac script. Perhaps we can loosen that. |
yes that's the one I've been referring to |
Anthony: we've discussed this in the core dev group, and we reached the conclusion that we'll not be adjusting the hard requirement in the .ac file. For deadsnakes, I would suggest to simply patch the .ac file before regenerating diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index a24cd68973..793cd859ad 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ dnl
# Set VERSION so we only need to edit in one place (i.e., here)
m4_define([PYTHON_VERSION], [3.13])
-AC_PREREQ([2.71])
+AC_PREREQ([2.69])
AC_INIT([python],[PYTHON_VERSION],[https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/])
|
I'll close this issue for now; Christian and I made several improvements to the AC code back in 3.10 and 3.11. IMO, future improvements should get their own targeted issues. (cc. @tiran, in case you're around) |
@erlend-aasland my fear is that 2.71+ syntax / features will get used -- what should I do then? |
I suggest sticking to the recommendations of the devguide: $ podman run --rm --pull=always -v $(pwd):/src:Z quay.io/tiran/cpython_autoconf:271
# ... or:
$ docker run --rm --pull=always -v $(pwd):/src quay.io/tiran/cpython_autoconf:271 Use the |
I can't just do that unfortunately. that's outside my control as debian packages both must build from source and use the packages of the distribution when 2.71+ syntax is used I'll basically have no choice but to drop the packages which is unfortunate but understandable |
Well, on the bright side, no "2.71+ syntax" did sneak in yet, so deadsnakes should be fine for now :) |
* Autoconf and aclocal: issue pythonGH-89886 * SQLite 3.15.2: issue pythonGH-105875 * Tcl/Tk 8.5.12: issue pythonGH-91152
--with-dyld
option #29500Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
bugs.python.org fields:
Linked PRs
--with-dyld
option #29500The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: