Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Getting gardener-extension-registry-cache production ready #3

Closed
96 tasks done
oliver-goetz opened this issue Oct 19, 2022 · 9 comments
Closed
96 tasks done

Getting gardener-extension-registry-cache production ready #3

oliver-goetz opened this issue Oct 19, 2022 · 9 comments
Assignees
Labels
area/ipcei IPCEI (Important Project of Common European Interest) area/quality Output qualification (tests, checks, scans, automation in general, etc.) related ipcei/registry-cache-extension Registry Cache Extension kind/epic Large multi-story topic

Comments

@oliver-goetz
Copy link
Member

oliver-goetz commented Oct 19, 2022

How to categorize this issue?

/area quality cost
/kind task

What would you like to be added:
At the end of our Hackathon we had some tasks on your list in order to make the registry-cache production ready.

Why is this needed:
Getting the registry-cache extension production ready.

Steps


@gardener-prow gardener-prow bot added area/quality Output qualification (tests, checks, scans, automation in general, etc.) related kind/task General task labels Oct 19, 2022
@JensAc
Copy link
Contributor

JensAc commented Oct 20, 2022

Seems to be a reasonable list. However, I am wondering whether we could just release a v0.0.1 before. Then we (23T) could easily include the extension in our public gardener installation and just see how the current state and further developments behave in a running environment. Any comments on that?

@JensAc
Copy link
Contributor

JensAc commented Oct 26, 2022

Would you like to release the v0.0.1 @oliver-goetz? Actually, I am not entirely sure how what kind of release workflow is intended for this repo.

@oliver-goetz
Copy link
Member Author

@JensAc sorry I missed your question 😅
There is no release workflow yet. I'll think about it.
However, we are already building dev images for each commit on main. You can find the images names + tags in the jobs log.

@rfranzke
Copy link
Member

rfranzke commented Dec 5, 2022

gardener/gardener#6999 is merged now which (I think) was the prerequisite to follow the "webhook approach" :)

@oliver-goetz
Copy link
Member Author

@JensAc finally, there is the first release 😄

@JensAc
Copy link
Contributor

JensAc commented Jan 23, 2023

Nice! Many thanks 👍

@timebertt
Copy link
Member

Considering the points in gardener/gardener#7316, this extension should not make use of the containerd imports feature.
Otherwise it might overwrite important containerd configuration.

@ialidzhikov ialidzhikov self-assigned this Jun 9, 2023
This was referenced Aug 17, 2023
@JordanJordanov JordanJordanov added area/ipcei IPCEI (Important Project of Common European Interest) kind/epic Large multi-story topic ipcei/registry-cache-extension Registry Cache Extension and removed kind/task General task labels May 15, 2024
@dimitar-kostadinov
Copy link
Contributor

All sub-tasks are completed.

/close

@gardener-prow gardener-prow bot closed this as completed Jun 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

gardener-prow bot commented Jun 4, 2024

@dimitar-kostadinov: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

All sub-tasks are completed.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/ipcei IPCEI (Important Project of Common European Interest) area/quality Output qualification (tests, checks, scans, automation in general, etc.) related ipcei/registry-cache-extension Registry Cache Extension kind/epic Large multi-story topic
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants